Noel Vest1, Meg Reinstra2, Christine Timko3, John Kelly4, Keith Humphreys3. 1. Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 401 Quarry Rd, Stanford, CA 94305, United States. Electronic address: noelvest@stanford.edu. 2. Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 401 Quarry Rd, Stanford, CA 94305, United States. 3. Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 401 Quarry Rd, Stanford, CA 94305, United States; Center for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Ave (152-MPD), Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States. 4. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The health and well-being of students in recovery from substance use disorder are increasingly being recognized as a priority on college campuses. This scoping review maps the state of the existing literature evaluating collegiate recovery programming to highlight research gaps and inform policy. METHOD: We conducted a systematic search of articles related to collegiate recovery programming published before August 2020. The 15 extracted study characteristics included publication type, study design, primary outcomes, reporting of behavioral addictions, mutual-help group attendance, sample demographic information, school size, ownership, and funding source. RESULTS: The PRISMA-guided search strategy identified 357 articles for abstract review; of 113 articles retained for full-text review, 54 studies met criteria for inclusion. Primary outcomes were coded into four domains: clinical, recovery experience, program characterization, and stigma. Most (57%) used quantitative observational designs and 41% employed qualitative research designs. Government or foundation grants funded 11% of the studies. CONCLUSION: The domains identified offer a framework for healthcare providers, college administrators, and researchers to understand and improve programs, thereby better serving this vulnerable student group.
BACKGROUND: The health and well-being of students in recovery from substance use disorder are increasingly being recognized as a priority on college campuses. This scoping review maps the state of the existing literature evaluating collegiate recovery programming to highlight research gaps and inform policy. METHOD: We conducted a systematic search of articles related to collegiate recovery programming published before August 2020. The 15 extracted study characteristics included publication type, study design, primary outcomes, reporting of behavioral addictions, mutual-help group attendance, sample demographic information, school size, ownership, and funding source. RESULTS: The PRISMA-guided search strategy identified 357 articles for abstract review; of 113 articles retained for full-text review, 54 studies met criteria for inclusion. Primary outcomes were coded into four domains: clinical, recovery experience, program characterization, and stigma. Most (57%) used quantitative observational designs and 41% employed qualitative research designs. Government or foundation grants funded 11% of the studies. CONCLUSION: The domains identified offer a framework for healthcare providers, college administrators, and researchers to understand and improve programs, thereby better serving this vulnerable student group.
Authors: Micah D J Peters; Christina M Godfrey; Hanan Khalil; Patricia McInerney; Deborah Parker; Cassia Baldini Soares Journal: Int J Evid Based Healthc Date: 2015-09
Authors: Amelia M Arria; Kimberly M Caldeira; Kathryn B Vincent; Emily R Winick; Rebecca A Baron; Kevin E O'Grady Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 3.084