Literature DB >> 34086782

Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study.

Céline Allard1, Emmanuel Pardo1,2, Christophe de la Jonquière1, Anne Wyniecki1, Anne Soulier1, Annibal Faddoul1, Eileen S Tsai3, Francis Bonnet1,2, Franck Verdonk1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regional analgesia is worth performing in the multimodal postoperative management of hip fracture (HF) because it reduces hospital morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and side effects of the recently described "Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block" with those of the femoral block, which is considered the standard of care for postoperative pain control after femoral neck fracture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a comparative observational study at a university hospital (Saint Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France), where the PENG block was introduced in August 2019. We include all patients from June to October 2019, who were coming for femoral neck fractures and who had an analgesic femoral block or PENG block before their surgery. The primary outcome was the comparison of cumulative postoperative morphine consumption 48 hours after surgery.
RESULTS: Demographics, medical charts, and perioperative data of 42 patients were reviewed: 21 patients before (Femoral group) and 21 patients after the introduction of PENG block (PENG group) in clinical practice. Thirteen total hip arthroplasties (THA) and eight hemi arthroplasties (HA) were included in each group. Demographics were also comparable. The median, postoperative, morphine equivalent consumption at 48 hours was 10 [0-20] mg and 20 [0-50] mg in Femoral and PENG groups respectively (p = 0.458). No statistically significant differences were found in postoperative pain intensity, time to ambulation, incidence of morphine-related side effects, or length of hospital stay. The postoperative muscle strength of the quadriceps was greater in the PENG group than in the Femoral group (5/5 vs. 2/5, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: In the management of hip fractures, PENG block is not associated in our study with a significant change in postoperative morphine consumption, compared to femoral block. However, it does significantly improve the immediate mobility of the operated limb, making it appropriate for inclusion in enhanced recovery programs after surgery.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34086782     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  4 in total

1.  Anesthetic management of hip fracture in geriatric patient with respiratory and heart failure using pericapsular nerve group block: A case report.

Authors:  Zejun Niu; Xiaolin Xu; Haichen Chu; Jihui Yin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 2.  Pericapsular Nerve Group Block and Iliopsoas Plane Block: A Scoping Review of Quadriceps Weakness after Two Proclaimed Motor-Sparing Hip Blocks.

Authors:  Shang-Ru Yeoh; Yen Chou; Shun-Ming Chan; Jin-De Hou; Jui-An Lin
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-18

Review 3.  The Use of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in Hip Surgeries Is Associated With a Reduction in Opioid Consumption, Less Motor Block, and Better Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Anwar U Huda; Hashsaam Ghafoor
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-06

4.  DOES PERICAPSULAR ANESTHETIC BLOCK IMPROVE THE POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD IN TRANSTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES?

Authors:  Bruno Silva Tavares; Rafael DE Almeida Machado; Ulisses Tavares DE Arruda; Leandro Alves DE Oliveira
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 0.683

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.