Literature DB >> 34086747

Vicarious traumatization in healthcare providers in response to COVID-19 pandemic in Kelantan, Malaysia.

Mohd Noor Norhayati1, Ruhana Che Yusof1, Mohd Yacob Azman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, frontline healthcare providers who are engaged in the direct diagnosis, treatment, and care of patients face a high risk of infection yet receive inadequate protection from contamination and minimal support to cope with overwork, frustration, and exhaustion. These problems have created significant psychological and mental health concerns for frontline healthcare providers. This study aimed to compare the levels of vicarious traumatization between frontline and non-frontline healthcare providers in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODOLOGY: All the subjects who met the inclusion criteria were recruited for this comparative cross-sectional study, which was conducted from May to July 2020 in two hospitals in Kelantan, Malaysia. A self-administered questionnaire, namely, the Malay-version Vicarious Traumatization Questionnaire and the Medical Outcome Study Social Support Survey were utilized. A descriptive analysis, independent t-test, and analysis of covariance were performed using SPSS Statistics version 26.
RESULTS: A total of 160 frontline and 146 non-frontline healthcare providers were recruited. Vicarious traumatization was significantly higher among the non-frontline healthcare providers (estimated marginal mean [95% CI]: 79.7 [75.12, 84.30]) compared to the frontline healthcare providers (estimated marginal mean [95% CI]: 74.3 [68.26, 80.37]) after adjusting for sex, duration of employment, and social support.
CONCLUSION: The level of vicarious traumatization was higher among non-frontline compared to frontline healthcare providers. However, the level of severity may differ from person to person, depending on how they handle their physical, psychological, and mental health. Hence, support from various resources, such as colleagues, family, the general public, and the government, may play an essential role in the mental health of healthcare providers.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34086747     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  4 in total

1.  Psychological demands of health professionals in the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Miryam Cristina Mazieiro Vergueiro da Silva; Bruno Ioschpe; Fernanda Santos Diniz; Graça Maria Ramos de Oliveira; Fabiana Saffi; Amanda Rafaella Abreu Soares; Cristiana Castanho de Almeida Rocca; Antonio de Pádua Serafim
Journal:  Psicol Reflex Crit       Date:  2022-01-04

2.  Difference in Pandemic-Related Experiences and Factors Associated with Sickness Absence among Nurses Working in COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Departments.

Authors:  Matea Dolić; Vesna Antičević; Krešimir Dolić; Zenon Pogorelić
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Adaptation and Validation of the Malay Version of the SAVE-9 Viral Epidemic Anxiety Scale for Healthcare Workers.

Authors:  Fatin Syafiqah Wasimin; Sean Chern Choong Thum; Mathias Wen Leh Tseu; Assis Kamu; Chong Mun Ho; Nicholas Tze Ping Pang; Seockhoon Chung; Walton Wider
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Post COVID-19 mental health symptoms and quality of life among COVID-19 frontline clinicians: a comparative study using propensity score matching approach.

Authors:  Yan-Jie Zhao; Xiaomeng Xing; Tengfei Tian; Qian Wang; Sixiang Liang; Zhe Wang; Teris Cheung; Zhaohui Su; Yi-Lang Tang; Chee H Ng; Sha Sha; Yu-Tao Xiang
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 7.989

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.