| Literature DB >> 34086447 |
Jesse D Contreras1, Mahfuza Islam2, Andrew Mertens3, Amy J Pickering4, Laura H Kwong5, Benjamin F Arnold6, Jade Benjamin-Chung3, Alan E Hubbard3, Mahfuja Alam2, Debashis Sen2, Sharmin Islam2, Mahbubur Rahman2, Leanne Unicomb2, Stephen P Luby5, John M Colford3, Ayse Ercumen1.
Abstract
Household latrine access generally is not associated with reduced fecal contamination in the environment, but its long-term effectiveness has not been measured. We conducted an environmental assessment nested within the WASH Benefits Bangladesh randomized controlled trial (NCT01590095). We quantified E. coli and fecal coliforms in samples of stored drinking water, child hands, mother hands, soil, and food among a random sample of households from the sanitation and control arms of the trial. Samples were collected during eight quarterly visits approximately 1-3.5 years after intervention initiation. Overall, there were no substantial differences in environmental fecal contamination between households enrolled in the sanitation and control arms. Statistically significant reductions were found in stored water and child hands after pooling across sampling rounds, but the effects were small and not consistent across rounds. In addition, we assessed potential effect modification of intervention effects by follow-up time, season, wealth, community-level latrine density and coverage, population density, and domestic animal ownership. While the intervention had statistically significant effects within some subgroups, there were no consistent patterns of effect modification. Our findings support a growing consensus that on-site latrines are insufficient to prevent fecal contamination in the rural household environment.Entities:
Keywords: E. coli; WASH; child feces management; disease transmission pathways; environmental sampling; fecal indicator bacteria; latrine; potty
Year: 2021 PMID: 34086447 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Technol ISSN: 0013-936X Impact factor: 9.028