Ashley E Davis1, Mark E Smyers1, Lisa Beltz2, Devanshi M Mehta2, Steven L Britton3,4, Lauren G Koch5, Colleen M Novak1,2. 1. School of Biomedical Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA. 2. Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 4. Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 5. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Abstract
NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? How does intrinsic aerobic capacity impact weight loss with 50% daily caloric restriction and alternate-day fasting? What is the main finding and its importance? Intermittent fasting is effective for weight loss in rats with low fitness, which highlights the importance of how intermittent fasting interacts with aerobic fitness. ABSTRACT: Recent interest has focused on the benefits of time-restricted feeding strategies, including intermittent fasting, for weight loss. It is not yet known whether intermittent fasting is more effective than daily caloric restriction at stimulating weight loss and how each is subject to individual differences. Here, rat models of leanness and obesity, artificially selected for intrinsically high (HCR) and low (LCR) aerobic capacity, were subjected to intermittent fasting and 50% calorie restrictive diets in two separate experiments using male rats. The lean, high-fitness HCR and obesity-prone, low-fitness LCR rats underwent 50% caloric restriction while body weight and composition were monitored. The low-fitness LCR rats were better able to retain lean mass than the high-fitness HCR rats, without significantly different proportional loss of weight or fat. In a separate experiment using intermittent fasting in male HCR and LCR rats, alternate-day fasting induced significantly greater loss of weight and fat mass in LCR compared with HCR rats, although the HCR rats had a more marked reduction in ad libitum daily food intake. Altogether, this suggests that intermittent fasting is an effective weight-loss strategy for those with low intrinsic aerobic fitness; however, direct comparison of caloric restriction and intermittent fasting is warranted to determine any differential effects on energy expenditure in lean and obesity-prone phenotypes.
NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? How does intrinsic aerobic capacity impact weight loss with 50% daily caloric restriction and alternate-day fasting? What is the main finding and its importance? Intermittent fasting is effective for weight loss in rats with low fitness, which highlights the importance of how intermittent fasting interacts with aerobic fitness. ABSTRACT: Recent interest has focused on the benefits of time-restricted feeding strategies, including intermittent fasting, for weight loss. It is not yet known whether intermittent fasting is more effective than daily caloric restriction at stimulating weight loss and how each is subject to individual differences. Here, rat models of leanness and obesity, artificially selected for intrinsically high (HCR) and low (LCR) aerobic capacity, were subjected to intermittent fasting and 50% calorie restrictive diets in two separate experiments using male rats. The lean, high-fitness HCR and obesity-prone, low-fitness LCR rats underwent 50% caloric restriction while body weight and composition were monitored. The low-fitness LCR rats were better able to retain lean mass than the high-fitness HCR rats, without significantly different proportional loss of weight or fat. In a separate experiment using intermittent fasting in male HCR and LCR rats, alternate-day fasting induced significantly greater loss of weight and fat mass in LCR compared with HCR rats, although the HCR rats had a more marked reduction in ad libitum daily food intake. Altogether, this suggests that intermittent fasting is an effective weight-loss strategy for those with low intrinsic aerobic fitness; however, direct comparison of caloric restriction and intermittent fasting is warranted to determine any differential effects on energy expenditure in lean and obesity-prone phenotypes.
Authors: Ruth E Patterson; Gail A Laughlin; Andrea Z LaCroix; Sheri J Hartman; Loki Natarajan; Carolyn M Senger; María Elena Martínez; Adriana Villaseñor; Dorothy D Sears; Catherine R Marinac; Linda C Gallo Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: E Matthew Morris; Grace M E Meers; Gregory N Ruegsegger; Umesh D Wankhade; Tommy Robinson; Lauren G Koch; Steven L Britton; R Scott Rector; Kartik Shankar; John P Thyfault Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: John F Trepanowski; Cynthia M Kroeger; Adrienne Barnosky; Monica C Klempel; Surabhi Bhutani; Kristin K Hoddy; Kelsey Gabel; Sally Freels; Joseph Rigdon; Jennifer Rood; Eric Ravussin; Krista A Varady Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 21.873