Kipruto Kirwa1, Adam A Szpiro2, Lianne Sheppard3, Paul D Sampson4, Meng Wang5,6, Joshua P Keller7, Michael T Young5, Sun-Young Kim5,8, Timothy V Larson9, Joel D Kaufman10. 1. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA. kirwa@uw.edu. 2. Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. Departments of Biostatistics and Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA. 4. Department of Statistics, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA. 5. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA. 6. Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions Research and Education in Energy, Environment and Water Institute, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. 7. Department of Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. 8. Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea. 9. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 10. Departments of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Epidemiology, and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Epidemiological studies of short- and long-term health impacts of ambient air pollutants require accurate exposure estimates. We describe the evolution in exposure assessment and assignment in air pollution epidemiology, with a focus on spatiotemporal techniques first developed to meet the needs of the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution (MESA Air). Initially designed to capture the substantial variation in pollutant levels and potential health impacts that can occur over small spatial and temporal scales in metropolitan areas, these methods have now matured to permit fine-scale exposure characterization across the contiguous USA and can be used for understanding long- and short-term health effects of exposure across the lifespan. For context, we highlight how the MESA Air models compare to other available exposure models. RECENT FINDINGS: Newer model-based exposure assessment techniques provide predictions of pollutant concentrations with fine spatial and temporal resolution. These validated models can predict concentrations of several pollutants, including particulate matter less than 2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5), oxides of nitrogen, and ozone, at specific locations (such as at residential addresses) over short time intervals (such as 2 weeks) across the contiguous USA between 1980 and the present. Advances in statistical methods, incorporation of supplemental pollutant monitoring campaigns, improved geographic information systems, and integration of more complete satellite and chemical transport model outputs have contributed to the increasing validity and refined spatiotemporal spans of available models. Modern models for predicting levels of outdoor concentrations of air pollutants can explain a substantial amount of the spatiotemporal variation in observations and are being used to provide critical insights into effects of air pollutants on the prevalence, incidence, progression, and prognosis of diseases across the lifespan. Additional enhancements in model inputs and model design, such as incorporation of better traffic data, novel monitoring platforms, and deployment of machine learning techniques, will allow even further improvements in the performance of pollutant prediction models.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Epidemiological studies of short- and long-term health impacts of ambient air pollutants require accurate exposure estimates. We describe the evolution in exposure assessment and assignment in air pollution epidemiology, with a focus on spatiotemporal techniques first developed to meet the needs of the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution (MESA Air). Initially designed to capture the substantial variation in pollutant levels and potential health impacts that can occur over small spatial and temporal scales in metropolitan areas, these methods have now matured to permit fine-scale exposure characterization across the contiguous USA and can be used for understanding long- and short-term health effects of exposure across the lifespan. For context, we highlight how the MESA Air models compare to other available exposure models. RECENT FINDINGS: Newer model-based exposure assessment techniques provide predictions of pollutant concentrations with fine spatial and temporal resolution. These validated models can predict concentrations of several pollutants, including particulate matter less than 2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5), oxides of nitrogen, and ozone, at specific locations (such as at residential addresses) over short time intervals (such as 2 weeks) across the contiguous USA between 1980 and the present. Advances in statistical methods, incorporation of supplemental pollutant monitoring campaigns, improved geographic information systems, and integration of more complete satellite and chemical transport model outputs have contributed to the increasing validity and refined spatiotemporal spans of available models. Modern models for predicting levels of outdoor concentrations of air pollutants can explain a substantial amount of the spatiotemporal variation in observations and are being used to provide critical insights into effects of air pollutants on the prevalence, incidence, progression, and prognosis of diseases across the lifespan. Additional enhancements in model inputs and model design, such as incorporation of better traffic data, novel monitoring platforms, and deployment of machine learning techniques, will allow even further improvements in the performance of pollutant prediction models.
Entities:
Keywords:
Air pollution; Environmental epidemiology; Exposure models; Spatiotemporal models
Authors: C A Pope; M J Thun; M M Namboodiri; D W Dockery; J S Evans; F E Speizer; C W Heath Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Joel D Kaufman; Sara D Adar; R Graham Barr; Matthew Budoff; Gregory L Burke; Cynthia L Curl; Martha L Daviglus; Ana V Diez Roux; Amanda J Gassett; David R Jacobs; Richard Kronmal; Timothy V Larson; Ana Navas-Acien; Casey Olives; Paul D Sampson; Lianne Sheppard; David S Siscovick; James H Stein; Adam A Szpiro; Karol E Watson Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Bernardo S Beckerman; Michael Jerrett; Marc Serre; Randall V Martin; Seung-Jae Lee; Aaron van Donkelaar; Zev Ross; Jason Su; Richard T Burnett Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2013-06-11 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Laura M Paulin; Amanda J Gassett; Neil E Alexis; Kipruto Kirwa; Richard E Kanner; Stephen Peters; Jerry A Krishnan; Robert Paine; Mark Dransfield; Prescott G Woodruff; Christopher B Cooper; R Graham Barr; Alejandro P Comellas; Cheryl S Pirozzi; MeiLan Han; Eric A Hoffman; Fernando J Martinez; Han Woo; Roger D Peng; Ashraf Fawzy; Nirupama Putcha; Patrick N Breysse; Joel D Kaufman; Nadia N Hansel Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Aaron J Cohen; Michael Brauer; Richard Burnett; H Ross Anderson; Joseph Frostad; Kara Estep; Kalpana Balakrishnan; Bert Brunekreef; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; Valery Feigin; Greg Freedman; Bryan Hubbell; Amelia Jobling; Haidong Kan; Luke Knibbs; Yang Liu; Randall Martin; Lidia Morawska; C Arden Pope; Hwashin Shin; Kurt Straif; Gavin Shaddick; Matthew Thomas; Rita van Dingenen; Aaron van Donkelaar; Theo Vos; Christopher J L Murray; Mohammad H Forouzanfar Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michael Jerrett; Michelle C Turner; Bernardo S Beckerman; C Arden Pope; Aaron van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Marc Serre; Dan Crouse; Susan M Gapstur; Daniel Krewski; W Ryan Diver; Patricia F Coogan; George D Thurston; Richard T Burnett Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Yu Ni; Christine T Loftus; Adam A Szpiro; Michael T Young; Marnie F Hazlehurst; Laura E Murphy; Frances A Tylavsky; W Alex Mason; Kaja Z LeWinn; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Emily S Barrett; Nicole R Bush; Catherine J Karr Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 11.035
Authors: Daniel A Enquobahrie; James MacDonald; Michael Hussey; Theo K Bammler; Christine T Loftus; Alison G Paquette; Nora Byington; Carmen J Marsit; Adam Szpiro; Joel D Kaufman; Kaja Z LeWinn; Nicole R Bush; Frances Tylavsky; Catherine J Karr; Sheela Sathyanarayana Journal: Environ Int Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 13.352
Authors: Yu Ni; Claire L Simpson; Robert L Davis; Adam A Szpiro; Catherine J Karr; Csaba P Kovesdy; Rebecca C Hjorten; Frances A Tylavsky; Nicole R Bush; Kaja Z LeWinn; Cheryl A Winkler; Jeffrey B Kopp; Yoshitsugu Obi Journal: Environ Res Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 8.431
Authors: Jianzhao Bi; Christopher Zuidema; David Clausen; Kipruto Kirwa; Michael T Young; Amanda J Gassett; Edmund Y W Seto; Paul D Sampson; Timothy V Larson; Adam A Szpiro; Lianne Sheppard; Joel D Kaufman Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2022-09-28 Impact factor: 11.035