Haley N Glatthorn1, Brent M Hanson2,3, Julia G Kim2,3, Nola S Herlihy2,3, Amber M Klimczak2,3, Kathleen H Hong2, Emre Seli2,4, Richard T Scott2,3. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 125 Paterson Street, Suite 2100, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA. hg299@rwjms.rutgers.edu. 2. IVI-Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA. 3. Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate embryology and pregnancy outcomes following individual and group embryo culture in the setting of contemporary laboratory practices and freeze-all cycles. METHODS: Patients underwent ovarian stimulation followed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Embryos proceeded through individual culture and then underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) via trophectoderm biopsy. In a subsequent cycle, participants underwent single embryo transfer of a vitrified-warmed, euploid embryo. Outcomes were compared to controls undergoing group culture during the same time frame. The Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression models were utilized. RESULTS: Outcomes were assessed for 144 patients whose embryos underwent individual culture and 449 controls whose embryos underwent group culture. There were no significant differences in fertilization rates between groups (81.7% for individual culture vs. 84.1% for group culture, p = 0.22). However, individual culture was associated with a decreased rate of blastocyst formation compared to group culture (43.5% vs. 48.5%, p < 0.01). Following single, vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer, there were no significant differences between individual culture and group culture, respectively, in rates of positive βhCG (81.9% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.91), sustained implantation (63.9% vs. 65.0%, p = 0.80), biochemical miscarriage (16.7% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.18), or clinical miscarriage (1.4% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.13). CONCLUSION: While individual culture appears to negatively impact the rate of usable blastocyst formation compared to group culture, there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes following transfer of a single, vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst.
PURPOSE: To evaluate embryology and pregnancy outcomes following individual and group embryo culture in the setting of contemporary laboratory practices and freeze-all cycles. METHODS: Patients underwent ovarian stimulation followed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Embryos proceeded through individual culture and then underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) via trophectoderm biopsy. In a subsequent cycle, participants underwent single embryo transfer of a vitrified-warmed, euploid embryo. Outcomes were compared to controls undergoing group culture during the same time frame. The Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression models were utilized. RESULTS: Outcomes were assessed for 144 patients whose embryos underwent individual culture and 449 controls whose embryos underwent group culture. There were no significant differences in fertilization rates between groups (81.7% for individual culture vs. 84.1% for group culture, p = 0.22). However, individual culture was associated with a decreased rate of blastocyst formation compared to group culture (43.5% vs. 48.5%, p < 0.01). Following single, vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer, there were no significant differences between individual culture and group culture, respectively, in rates of positive βhCG (81.9% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.91), sustained implantation (63.9% vs. 65.0%, p = 0.80), biochemical miscarriage (16.7% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.18), or clinical miscarriage (1.4% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.13). CONCLUSION: While individual culture appears to negatively impact the rate of usable blastocyst formation compared to group culture, there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes following transfer of a single, vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst.
Authors: Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Anna Rapani; Polina Giannelou; George Anifandis; Stamatis Bolaris; Agni Pantou; Maria Lambropoulou; Athanasios Pappas; Efthimios Deligeoroglou; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris Journal: In Vivo Date: 2018 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Ashley W Tiegs; Xin Tao; Yiping Zhan; Christine Whitehead; Julia Kim; Brent Hanson; Emily Osman; Thomas J Kim; George Patounakis; Jacqueline Gutmann; Arthur Castelbaum; Emre Seli; Chaim Jalas; Richard T Scott Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 7.329