Literature DB >> 34086087

Long-term outcomes of Hartmann's procedure versus primary anastomosis for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis: follow-up of a prospective multicenter randomized trial (DIVERTI).

M Loire1, V Bridoux1, D Mege2, M Mathonnet3, F Mauvais4, C Massonnaud5, J M Regimbeau6, J J Tuech7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of Hinchey III and IV diverticulitis involves Hartmann's procedure (HP) or primary resection anastomosis (PRA) with or without fecal diversion. These procedures were evaluated in four randomized controlled trials. Early results from these trials demonstrated similar rates of complications but higher rates of colonic restoration after PRA than HP. Long-term follow-up has not been reported to date. The aim of this study was to analyze long-term outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in patients previously enrolled in a prospective randomized trial comparing HP and PRA for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis (DIVERTI trial). STUDY
DESIGN: Follow-up data were available for 78 of 102 patients. Demographic data, incisional hernia rate, need for additional surgery related to the primary procedure, and QoL were recorded.
RESULTS: The overall survival rate was 76% and did not differ between the two groups. Incisional hernia was reported in 21 (52%) patients in the HP arm and in 11 (29%) patients in the PRA arm (p = 0.035). The HP arm demonstrated significantly lower SF-36 physical and mental component scores. The mean general QoL (EQ-VAS) and mean EQ-5D index scores were better after PRA than after HP, but this difference was not statistically significant. The results of GIQLI, which measures intestine-specific QOL, did not differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This follow-up study with a median follow-up time of > 9 years among living patients indicates that PRA for perforated diverticulitis is associated with fewer long-term complications and better QoL than HP. PRA significantly reduced the incisional hernia rate and the need for reoperation. Long-term survival was not jeopardized by the PRA approach. Future studies are needed to address the utility of protective stoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hartmann’s procedure; Perforated diverticulitis; Peritonitis; Primary anastomosis; Quality of life; Rectosigmoid resection

Year:  2021        PMID: 34086087     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03962-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  2 in total

1.  [First validation of the French version of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI)].

Authors:  K Slim; J Bousquet; F Kwiatkowski; G Lescure; D Pezet; J Chipponi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  1999-01

2.  Primary Anastomosis for Perforated Diverticulitis with Peritonitis: Post-hoc Pooled Analysis of Prospective Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Mahir Gachabayov; Christian E Oberkofler; Gian Andrea Binda; Jean-Marc Regimbeau; Dieter Hahnloser; Jean-Jacques Tuech; Roberto Bergamaschi
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2019-05-15
  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Role of protective stoma after primary anastomosis for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis-DIVERTI 2 (a prospective multicenter randomized trial): rationale and design (nct04604730).

Authors:  Jean Pinson; Jean-Jacques Tuech; Mehdi Ouaissi; Murielle Mathonnet; François Mauvais; Estelle Houivet; Elie Lacroix; Julie Rondeaux; Charles Sabbagh; Valérie Bridoux
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 2.  Current Aspects on the Management of Perforated Acute Diverticulitis: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Efstathios T Pavlidis; Theodoros E Pavlidis
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.