| Literature DB >> 34085057 |
Melissa Agsalda-Garcia1, Tiffany Shieh1, Ryan Souza1, Natalie Kamada1, Nicholas Loi1, Robert Oda2, Tayro Acosta-Maeda3, So Yung Choi4, Eunjung Lim4, Anupam Misra3, Bruce Shiramizu1.
Abstract
Raman-enhanced spectroscopy (RESpect) probe, which enhances Raman spectroscopy technology through a portable fiber-optic device, characterizes tissues and cells by identifying molecular chemical composition showing distinct differences/similarities for potential tumor markers or diagnosis. In a feasibility study with the ultimate objective to translate the technology to the clinic, a panel of pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma tissues and non-malignant specimens had RS analyses compared between standard Raman spectroscopy microscope instrument and RESpect probe. Cryopreserved tissues were mounted on front-coated aluminum mirror slides and analyzed by standard Raman spectroscopy and RESpect probe. Principal Component Analysis revealed similarities between non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes but not follicular hyperplasia. Standard Raman spectroscopy and RESpect probe fingerprint comparisons demonstrated comparable primary peaks. Raman spectroscopic fingerprints and peaks of pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes and follicular hyperplasia provided novel avenues to pursue diagnostic approaches and identify potential new therapeutic targets. The information could inform new insights into molecular cellular pathogenesis. Translating Raman spectroscopy technology by using the RESpect probe as a potential point-of-care screening instrument has the potential to change the paradigm of screening for cancer as an initial step to determine when a definitive tissue biopsy would be necessary.Entities:
Keywords: Lymphoma; Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma; Raman Spectroscopy
Year: 2020 PMID: 34085057 PMCID: PMC8172049 DOI: 10.28991/scimedj-2020-0201-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: SciMed J ISSN: 2704-9833
Tissue characteristics
| Tissue | Age | Sex | Tumor Site | Pathology | Tumor Vs Necrosis % | Tumor Vs Stroma % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | F | Lymph Node | Follicular hyperplasia | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 11 | F | Lymph Node | Follicular hyperplasia | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 6 | M | Lymph Node | Follicular hyperplasia | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 3 | M | Abdomen | Burkitt | 100 | 100 |
| 5 | 19 | M | Retroperitoneum | Burkitt-like | 100 | 70 |
| 6 | 5 | M | Ileum | Burkitt-like | 100 | 90 |
| 7 | 20 | M | Retroperitoneum | Recurrent B-cell | 100 | 100 |
| 8 | 19 | M | Lymph Node | Diffuse large B-cell | 100 | 100 |
| 9 | 18 | F | Lymph Node | Diffuse, large T-cell | 100 | 100 |
| 10 | 18 | M | Lymph Node | T-cell lymphoblastic | 100 | 80 |
| 11 | 15 | M | Lymph node-left | T-cell lymphoblastic | 100 | 100 |
Figure 1.Raman spectroscopy (RS) peaks and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) plots of all NHL specimens categorized into T-cell NHL (T-NHL), B-cell NHL (B-NHL), and follicular hyperplasia (FHP). A) Averaged RS peaks from T-NHL, B- NHL, and FHP highlighting the 1350–1400 cm−1 region; B) PCA of NHL subtypes belonging to T-NHL; C) PCA of NHL subtypes belonging to B-NHL; D) PCA of FHP cases.
Figure 2.Comparison of averaged Raman spectroscopy (RS) peaks of T-NHL, B-NHL, and FHP from RESpect probe and RS instrument. Primary peaks (1095, 1337, 1448, and 1659 cm−1) from the two RS sources are comparable