| Literature DB >> 34084937 |
Abstract
The chest X-ray is one of the most common radiological examination types for the diagnosis of chest diseases. Nowadays, the automatic classification technology of radiological images has been widely used in clinical diagnosis and treatment plans. However, each disease has its own different response characteristic receptive field region, which is the main challenge for chest disease classification tasks. Besides, the imbalance of sample data categories further increases the difficulty of tasks. To solve these problems, we propose a new multi-label chest disease image classification scheme based on a multi-scale attention network. In this scheme, multi-scale information is iteratively fused to focus on regions with a high probability of disease, to effectively mine more meaningful information from data. A novel loss function is also designed to improve the rationality of visual perception and multi-label image classification, which forces the consistency of attention regions before and after image transformation. A comprehensive experiment was carried out on the Chest X-Ray14 and CheXpert datasets, separately containing over 100,000 frontal-view and 200,000 front and side view X-ray images with 14 diseases. The AUROC is 0.850 and 0.815 respectively on the two data sets, which achieve the state-of-the-art results, verified the effectiveness of this method in chest X-ray image classification. This study has important practical significance for using AI algorithms to assist radiologists in improving work efficiency and diagnostic accuracy.Entities:
Keywords: Chest X-Ray images; Image Classification; Multi-Scale Attention Networks; Multi-label
Year: 2021 PMID: 34084937 PMCID: PMC8157016 DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.541
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ Comput Sci ISSN: 2376-5992
Figure 1Illustration of the proposed MC-AB.
Figure 2Illustration of the proposed MS-FIF.
Figure 3Multi-Scale Attention Networks.
(1) MS-FIF is used to better iteratively fuse features; (2) using CAM to get the pathogenic attention map, prompting the network to focus only on areas with high pathogenic probability; (3) false frame represents the perceived loss and multi-label balance loss.
Results comparison between different methods on Chest X-Ray14 dataset.
| Diseases | MS-ANet1 | MS-ANet2 | MS-ANet3 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Split by Wang | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Image resize | 256*256 | 256*256 | 256*256 | 256*256 | 256*256 | 256*256 | 256*256 | 256*256 | 256*256 | 256*256 |
| Atelectasis | 0.773 | 0.733 | 0.759 | 0.800 | 0.767 | 0.743 | 0.777 | 0.823 | 0.829 | |
| Cardiomegaly | 0.854 | 0.856 | 0.871 | 0.870 | 0.883 | 0.875 | 0.894 | 0.908 | 0.905 | |
| Effusion | 0.861 | 0.806 | 0.821 | 0.870 | 0.828 | 0.811 | 0.829 | 0.882 | 0.880 | |
| Infiltration | 0.636 | 0.673 | 0.700 | 0.700 | 0.709 | 0.677 | 0.696 | 0.711 | 0.713 | |
| Mass | 0.761 | 0.718 | 0.810 | 0.830 | 0.821 | 0.783 | 0.838 | 0.855 | 0.847 | |
| Nodule | 0.664 | 0.777 | 0.759 | 0.750 | 0.758 | 0.698 | 0.771 | 0.791 | 0.788 | |
| Pneumonia | 0.664 | 0.684 | 0.718 | 0.670 | 0.731 | 0.696 | 0.722 | 0.775 | 0.775 | |
| Pneumothorax | 0.799 | 0.805 | 0.848 | 0.870 | 0.846 | 0.810 | 0.862 | 0.875 | 0.884 | |
| Consolidation | 0.770 | 0.711 | 0.741 | 0.800 | 0.745 | 0.726 | 0.750 | 0.814 | 0.815 | |
| Edema | 0.861 | 0.806 | 0.844 | 0.880 | 0.835 | 0.833 | 0.846 | 0.900 | 0.897 | |
| Emphysema | 0.736 | 0.842 | 0.891 | 0.910 | 0.895 | 0.822 | 0.908 | 0.929 | 0.932 | |
| Fibrosis | 0.739 | 0.743 | 0.810 | 0.780 | 0.818 | 0.804 | 0.827 | 0.848 | 0.841 | |
| PT | 0.749 | 0.724 | 0.768 | 0.790 | 0.761 | 0.751 | 0.779 | 0.790 | 0.789 | |
| Hernia | 0.746 | 0.775 | 0.867 | 0.770 | 0.896 | 0.900 | 0.934 | 0.947 | 0.936 | |
| Average | 0.758 | 0.761 | 0.801 | 0.806 | 0.807 | 0.781 | 0.817 | 0.847 | 0.845 |
Note:
The best results are marked in bold.
Results comparison between different methods.
| Methods | Methods | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 + | 0.801 | 169 (MS-FIF) + | 0.839 |
| 121 + | 0.806 | 121 (MS-FIF) + | 0.847 |
| 121 (MS-FIF) + | 0.840 | 121+169 (MS-FIF) + | 0.850 |
| 121+169 (MS-FIF) + | 0.842 | 169 (MS-FIF) + | 0.845 |
Figure 4Figure 4. The results of the localization of chest diseases.
(A) Atelectasis, (B) Cardiomegaly, (C) Effusion, (D) Infiltration, (E) Mass, (F) Nodule, (G) Pneumonia, (H) Pneumothorax.
Results comparison on 14 labels classification tasks on CheXpert dataset.
| Experiments | Frontal views only | Frontal + Lateral (Equally) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labels | CheXNet | MS-ANet | CheXNet | MS-ANet | ||
| Atelectasis | 0.659 | 0.667 | 0.707 | 0.713 | ||
| Cardiomegaly | 0.775 | 0.773 | 0.775 | 0.818 | ||
| Consolidation | 0.702 | 0.732 | 0.755 | 0.757 | ||
| Edema | 0.827 | 0.840 | 0.863 | 0.861 | ||
| Enlarged Cardio | 0.551 | 0.541 | 0.531 | 0.541 | ||
| Fracture | 0.616 | 0.722 | 0.588 | 0.735 | ||
| Lung Lesion | 0.704 | 0.757 | 0.288 | 0.710 | 0.288 | |
| Lung Opacity | 0.767 | 0.788 | 0.784 | 0.783 | ||
| No Finding | 0.887 | 0.864 | 0.872 | 0.859 | ||
| Pleural Effusion | 0.860 | 0.892 | 0.919 | 0.874 | 0.892 | |
| Pleural Other | 0.607 | 0.711 | 0.710 | 0.680 | ||
| Pneumonia | 0.641 | 0.645 | 0.535 | 0.645 | ||
| Pneumothorax | 0.807 | 0.824 | 0.842 | 0.836 | ||
| Support Devices | 0.869 | 0.889 | 0.899 | 0.913 | ||
| Average | 0.734 | 0.768 | 0.746 | 0.775 | ||
Note:
The highest AUROC scores are marked in bold.