Literature DB >> 34084857

Awareness and experience of health-care workers during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Satya Prakash Meena1, Manisha Jhirwal2, Ashok Kumar Puranik1, Naveen Sharma1, Mahaveer Singh Rodha3, Mahendra Lodha1, Mayank Badkur1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the 2nd week of July 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) infection spreading in the community. Now more than 15 lakhs peoples have been infected in India, out of the 26816 patients were deceased. COVID 19 outbreaks become an additional hazard to the health-care workers (HCWs), leading to fatigue, anxiety, depression and fear of death. The objective of this questionnaire-based study is to know about the knowledge of HCWs about COVID 19, their experiences while dealing with the disease, and the protective measures taken to prevent the infection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted for 1 month starting from the 2nd week of June 2020 after getting institutional ethical clearance. This study included 240 HCWs posted in the medical and surgical Departments of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. This questionnaire was prepared in online Google forms and required 2 min to complete. Mean, median, range, and standard deviation were used to describe the continuous variables, and percentages were used to describe the categorical data.
RESULTS: Among 240 HCWs, 79.16% (n = 190) participants have good knowledge and adapted good precautions (score 15-23) for COVID 19 infection. Rest 20% (n = 48) and 0.8% (n = 2) participants has average (score 8-14) or poor knowledge (score <8) with adaptation of average or poor precautionary measures against COVID 19, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This study concluded that we have the requirement of more educational training programs for awareness of HCWs and precautionary measures against COVID 19. Thereby, HCWs can improve their knowledge and participate in this fight against COVID 19 with more efficiency and confidence. Copyright:
© 2021 Journal of Education and Health Promotion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Awareness; coronavirus disease 2019; health care worker; knowledge; precautions

Year:  2021        PMID: 34084857      PMCID: PMC8150085          DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_874_20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Educ Health Promot        ISSN: 2277-9531


Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) is caused by a coronavirus that has evolved as a pandemic now.[1] First-time corona virus-related respiratory illness was detected in Wuhan, China.[1] The health-care workers (HCW) are front line warriors to fight against COVID 19. On a daily basis, they are exposed to infected patients for a long and are at increased risk of getting infected with this respiratory illness.[2] To date, many efforts have been made to know about the infectivity of coronavirus, clinical features, and diagnostic modalities, but no effective specific treatment is accessible yet.[3] The infection with the SARS COV-2 virus has emerged as an additional hazard to the HCWs leading to fatigue, anxiety, depression, and fear of death. Due to poor understanding and lack of awareness about SARS-COV2 infection, the disease is spreading rapidly in India. It is important for all, especially the HCWs to have adequate knowledge and perception about COVID 19. For all the HCWs it is mandatory to have proper training before their posting in COVID 19 positive patient wards so that they can treat the patient efficiently. HCWs should know about the course of COVID 19 infection, mode of transmission, protective measures, proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE), and precautions taken to elude the COVID 19 infection. The objective of this study is to assess the knowledge of HCWs about the mode of transmission of infection, the seriousness of disease, and precautions are taken to prevent the infection with COVID 19.

Materials and Methods

Study design

A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted in the medical and surgical Departments of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

Sampling method and study population

This was the cross-sectional, duration based study, which was conducted for the period of one month after getting the institutional ethical clearance at AIIMS Jodhpur (AIIMS/IEC/2020-21/3039).

Inclusion criteria

All the HCWs (consultants, residents, interns, nursing officers) posted in the medical and surgical Departments of AIIMS Jodhpur HCWs consenting to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria-No exclusion criteria

Questionnaire formation and data collection

For this study, a questionnaire was formed with the help of training material from CDC update and the WHO for the detection, prevention, response, and control of COVID-19.[45] This questionnaire was prepared in online Google forms which were sent to all consultants, postgraduate students, interns, and nursing staff. This questionnaire was provided in Hindi or English language and divided into different aspects of HCWs. First, online consent was obtained from all the participants before attending the questionnaire. [Annexure 1] All the questions were in the form of multiple choice. The total number of multiple-choice questions was 25 other than demography. It took only 2 min to attend all the questions, and after attending the questions, the form was submitted online. The questionnaire was divided into four parts: Demography of the HCWs: included age, gender, address, designation, number of children, type of family, and living place Awareness about COVID 19: included eleven questions, to determine the knowledge of HCWs about virus causing COVID 19, mode of transmission, incubation period, preventive measures, PPE kit, isolation, etc., Each correct response to questions in the section of awareness about the COVID 19 infection was given mark one Personal experience of HCWs during COVID 19: included six questions about HCWs who were tested, underwent isolation or self-quarantine. Experience of HCW related to facing violence at the workplace and psychological effect also included Precautionary measures taken by HCWs during COVID 19: included eight questions to know about the measures taken by HCW to prevent infection such as social distancing, using ayurvedic medicine to improve immunity, precaution at home, and changes in routine activities. Each correct response to questions in the section of precautions taken during COVID 19 was given mark one.

The reliability of the questionnaire

A questionnaire was formed with the help of training material from CDC update and WHO for the detection, prevention, response, and control of COVID-19. That questionnaire was sent to experts of different departments at AIIMS Jodhpur like the Department of Preventive and social medicine, Department of General Surgery, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. A piolet study was conducted on 20 HCWs working in clinical areas. The clarity, understanding, and organization of the questionnaire were checked. The suggestions for possible improvement from the respondents were considered. Cronbach's alpha test did the validation of the questionnaire and its value was 0.89. These participants from the pilot study were not included in the research.

Scoring method

This self-administered questionnaire includes a total of thirty-eight closed-ended questions and took approximately 2 min to complete. Each correct response to questions in the section of awareness about the COVID 19 infection and precautions taken to protect and prevent the transmission of the infection was given a score of one. Twenty-three was the total expected score. The final score was calculated and categorized as- Good knowledge and adequate precaution (Score 15–23) Average knowledge and average precaution (Score 8–14) or Poor knowledge and inadequate precautions taken (Score < 8).

Statistical analysis

The data were formulated in an excel sheet and was analysed using the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for window, version 2 0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York, US). Mean, median, range, and standard deviation were used to describe the continuous variables, and percentages were used to describe the categorical data.

Ethical considerations

Confidentiality of personal information of participates was maintained throughout the study by making participants’ information anonymous and asking participants to provide honest answers. All HCW's participation in this questionnaire-base study was voluntary, and validated informed consent took before starting to fill this questionnaire.

Results

Demographic variables

In this study, total of 240 HCWs from the medical and surgical department participated. The HCWs included Consultants, Nursing officers, Postgraduate residents, and interns. The majority of participants were from the age group of 20–30 years (73.3%) with a mean of 28.15 ± 5.91. Out of 240 participants, 71.3% (n = 171) were male and only 28.7% (n = 69) were female. Among the various subgroups, 33.3% (n = 80) were nursing officers, 28.7% (n = 69) were interns, 25% (n = 60) were postgraduate residents and 12.9% (n = 31) were consultants. As per containment area, 89.6% (n = 215) were from noncontainment zone and 10.4% (n = 25) were from containment zone Jodhpur. It has been observed that out of 240 participants, spouses of 18.3% (n = 44) were HCWs and 6.3% (n = 7) were highly exposed employee. Out of 240 HCW, 14.2% (n = 34) were staying in joint family and rest 85.8% (n = 206) had nuclear family. In the family, 14 (5.8%) HCW had children >15 years old and 84 (35%) HCW had children <15 years old. Few HCW (n = 14; 17.9%) had kids <5 years of age [Table 1].
Table 1

Demographic variables (n=240)

Demographic variablesTotal, n (%)
Age (years)
 20-30176 (73.3)
 30-4055 (22.9)
 >409 (3.8)
Gender
 Female69 (28.7)
 Male171 (71.3)
Residential location
 Containment zone, Jodhpur25 (10.4)
 Noncontainment zone, Jodhpur215 (89.6)
Marital status
 Married103 (42.90)
 Single137 (57)
Designation of HCW
 Consultant31 (12.9)
 Resident60 (25.0)
 Nursing officer80 (33.3)
 Intern69 (28.7)
Spouse occupation
 Home maker60 (25)
 Health care worker44 (18.3)
 Highly exposed employee7 (2.9)
 Nonexposed employee15 (6.3)
 Not applicable114 (52.2)
Type of family
 Joint family34 (14.2)
 Nuclear family206 (85.8)
Family members
 <5 members210 (87.5)
 6-10 members28 (11.7)
 More than 10 Members2 (0.8)
Number of children (years)
 <543 (17.9)
 5-1032 (13.3)
 10-159 (3.8)
 More than 15 years14 (5.8)
 No children142 (59.2)
Total240 (100)

HCW=Health care worker

Demographic variables (n=240) HCW=Health care worker

Awareness about coronavirus disease 2019

Among 240 participants, 87% (n = 27) consultants were knowing about the causative agent of COVID 19. The mode of transmission was correctly answered by interns 72.46% (n = 50) followed by consultants 70.96% (n = 22). The interns were more aware (n = 40; 57.97%) about the incubation period of COVID 19 followed by consultants (n = 15; 48.38%). The nursing officers were more aware of the symptoms of the infection which was correctly answered by 58.75% (n = 47) followed by consultants 58.06% (n = 18). The mode of virus transmission is correctly answered by 72.46% (n = 50) interns, 70.96% (n = 22) consultants, 65% (n = 39) residents, and 63.75% (n = 51) nursing officers. The interns and residents were more aware of the method of handwashing as it was correctly answered by 31.88% (n = 22) and 26.66% (n = 16), respectively. The preventive measures like frequent hand washing, using sanitizers and PPE kit were adequately taken by 100% (n = 31) consultants, followed by interns 97.10% (n = 67). The knowledge about the isolation room for COVID 19-positive patients were more in interns (65.21%, n = 45) and residents (60%, n = 36). The information about wearing PPE kit was more in consultants, interns, residents and nursing officers 25.80% (n = 8), 23.18% (n = 16), 21.66% (n = 13) and 8.75% (n = 07), respectively. The consultants (n = 8, 25.80%) and interns (n = 17, 24.63%) were aware of the actual meaning of close contact with infected patients [Table 2].
Table 2

Awareness and precautions taken by health care workers

Questions on awareness and precautionsConsultants (n=31), n (%)Nursing officer (n=80), n (%)Resident (n=60), n (%)Intern (n=69), n (%)
A 127 (87)42 (52.50)45 (75)54 (78.26)
A222 (70.96)51 (63.75)39 (65)50 (72.46)
A 315 (48.38)36 (45)22 (36.66)40 (57.97)
A 418 (58.06)47 (58.75)28 (46.66)10 (14.49)
A 528 (90.32)50 (62.50)47 (78.33)61 (88.40)
A 65 (16.12)15 (18.75)16 (26.66)22 (31.88)
A 731 (100)74 (92.50)58 (96.66)67 (97.10)
A 825 (80.64)38 (47.50)23 (38.33)22 (31.88)
A 930 (96.77)79 (98.75)58 (96.66)59 (85.50)
A 108 (25.80)7 (8.75)13 (21.66)16 (23.18)
A 1125 (80.64)62 (77.50)48 (80)54 (78.26)
P 13 (9.6)59 (73.75)39 (65)37 (53.62)
P 228 (90.32)78 (97.50)51 (85)46 (66.66)
P 331 (100)79 (98.75)59 (98.33)65 (94.20)
P 430 (96.77)80 (100)57 (95)62 (89.85)
P 528 (90.32)48 (60)52 (86.66)59 (85.50)
P 627 (87.09)65 (81.25)39 (65)40 (57.97)
P 728 (90.32)62 (77.50)47 (78.33)49 (71.01)
P 831 (100)66 (82.50)51 (85)64 (92.75)
Awareness and precautions taken by health care workers

Precautions taken by health-care workers

A total 90.32% (n = 28) consultants and 97.5% (n = 78) nursing officers took adequate preventive measures such as changing clothes and taking bath. About 97.5% of HCW were cleaning their hands with soap and water or sanitizer to maintain hygiene and to prevent disease affection. The nursing officer and consultants were using face masks after entering the hospital 100% (n = 80) and 96.77% (n = 31), respectively. It has been observed that 15.8% (n = 38) HCWs were taking ayurvedic medicines to boost the immunity. Out of 240 HCW, 77.5% and 88.33% were avoiding going out to market or relatives place to avoid the community spread, respectively [Table 2].

Personal experience

Among 240 HCWs, 18.3% (n = 44) were tested for COVID 19, 16.3% (n = 39) were isolated and 41.3% (n = 99) were quarantined. In this pandemic, 4.2% (n = 10) HCW faced violence in hospitals during this COVID pandemic. According to 53% (n = 129) HCW, the patient's care and management was affected due to fear of getting COVID infection. Multiple episodes of anxiety, depression, and feeling low were experienced by 58.8% (n = 41) HCWs. The mean score of awareness and precautions taken by all participants was 16.25 ± 2.58. Among 240 HCW, 79.16% (n = 190), 20% (n = 48) and 0.8% (n = 2) scored 15–23, 8–14 and <8 respectively. Out of this 79.16% participants, consultants, interns, residents and nursing officers scored 83%, 89.63%, 81.66%, and 66.25%, respectively. There were two interns who scored <8 (0.8%). Among subgroups, 33.75% (n = 27) nursing officer, 18.33% (n = 11) residents, 16.10% (n = 5) consultant and 7.24% (n = 5) interns scored between 8 and 14 [Table 3].
Table 3

Personal experience

Designation questionsConsultant, n (%)Nursing officer, n (%)Resident, n (%)Intern, n (%)

YesNoYesNoYesNoYesNo
Question 15 (16.1)26 (83.9)20 (25)60 (75)14 (23.3)46 (76.7)5 (92.8)64 (7.2)
Question 22 (6.5)29 (93.5)14 (17.5)66 (82.5)19 (31.7)41 (68.3)4 (5.8)65 (94.2)
Question 37 (22.7)24 (77.4)48 (60)32 (40)27 (45)33 (55)17 (24.6)52 (75.4)
Question 40 (0)31 (100)7 (8.8)73 (91.2)2 (3.3)58 (96.7)1 (1.4)68 (98.6)
Question 520 (64.5)11 (35.5)32 (40)48 (60)29 (48.3)31 (51.7)48 (69.9)21 (30.4)
Question 617 (54.8)14 (45.2)46 (57.5)34 (42.5)35 (58.3)25 (41.7)43 (62.3)26 (37.7)
Personal experience According to our study, 79.16% (n = 190) participants have good knowledge and adapted good precautions (score 15–23) for COVID 19 infection. Rest 20% (n = 48) and 0.8% (n = 2) participants have an average (score 8–14) or poor knowledge (score <8) with an adaptation of average or poor precautionary measures against COVID 19, respectively [Table 4].
Table 4

Health care worker distribution according to the scoring (n=240)

Total scoreFrequency (%)
Score<82 (0.8)
Score 8-1448 (20)
Score 15-23190 (79.20)
Total score240 (100)
Health care worker distribution according to the scoring (n=240)

Discussion

According to the Indian council of medical research, there are 15 lakh COVID positive cases in India. In this pandemic of COVID 19, HCW are at increased risk of getting infected. Adequate knowledge about the COVID infection and precautionary measures can help HCW to protect themselves from getting infected. With the help of this questionnaire-based study, we are providing an overview of HCW about awareness, precautions taken, and personal experience in COVID 19 pandemic. The majority of HCWs were below 30 years of age (28.15 ± 5.9) who participated in this study. Our study is supported by Mumu et al. where the majority of doctors participated were <30 years of age with a female predominance.[6] It has been recorded that about 21.2% (n = 51) spouse of HCW was also HCW or highly exposed employees, which increases the probability of getting infected with COVID 19. For all the HCW, it is important to know about the mode of infection with COVID 19 and its precautionary measures to prevent the further transmission of the disease. In this study, most of the HCW knew about the causative agent of COVID19. It is important to know about the mode of transmission of COVID 19. Unfortunately, less number of HCW knew about the incubation period of COVID 19. It is important to know the incubation period of the COVID 19 to determine the safe period to treat suspected patients and to advise the patient for isolation or quarantine to prevent the transmission of the infection.[7] The symptoms of COVID 19 include fever, cough, sneezing, running nose, breathlessness, sore throat, and diarrhea. It is important for all HCW to know about the symptoms and signs of infection so that they can identify the suspected patients and can treat the disease timely and prevent the life-threatening complication. In our study, <½ of HCW knew about all the presenting symptoms of COVID 19.[8] This is unfortunate that despite a large number of resources, training provided to HCWs, there is a gap between the amount of information given and the depth of knowledge attained. It concluded that we need more informative educational training about COVID 19. Most of the HCW consider the COVID 19 infection as a dangerous and fatal disease. To prevent the transmission, the COVID 19 positive patients should be kept in an air-born isolation room without exhaust. Hand hygiene plays an important role in preventing the spread of infection. According to the CDC, alcohol-based hand rub or soap should be used.[9] In our survey, <25% of HCW correctly answered the method of hand washing. The CDC has provided recommendations about using PPE kit for COVID 19 suspect or confirmed patients.[1011] The awareness about using PPE kit while examining or operating the COVID 19 suspect or positive patients was high in all HCWs. Almost all participants have given correct answers about PPE Kit. In our study, it has been observed that >50% of HCW were feeling depressed and low. During this COVID 19 pandemic, HCW is more worried about getting infected as they are front line warriors which can lead to insomnia, anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive symptoms.[1213] For HCWs, it is important to provide adequate working conditions, recovery programs to ensure the best mental, physical and social conditions so that the HCW can maintain or attain an optimal state of health.[14] As per our institute protocol, only 18.33% HCW were tested for COVID 19 as they were exposed to COVID confirmed patients and <50% were quarantined. The quarantine was done to reduce the outbreak of infections and to restore public health.[15] Among this tested HCW, about half of the participants felt that the patient's care and management are affected because of fear of getting infected with COVID 19. There are more chances of acquiring infection in the family if both the partners are HCWs or highly exposed employees. It has been observed in the study that a spouse of 21.25% of participants were HCW or highly exposed employees, out this >80% HCW did not prefer to get isolated. Children have more chances of getting infected as they have low immunity. In this study, 35% of HCW had children with an age <15 years. However, only 13% preferred to get isolated to protect their children. COVID 19 infection is in a phase of community spread. It can only be controlled by maintaining adequate hygiene and following social distancing. About 14% of HCW followed the social distancing at home and kept themselves in isolation. Among all participants, the knowledge score regarding COVID 19 infection and precautionary measures was 16.28 ± 2.56. Among all, 79% of HCW were having a score between 15 and 23. The score between 8 and 14 and <8 was attended by 20% and 0.8% of HCW, respectively [Table 4]. It has been observed that awareness about COVID 19, is good (> 80%) in interns, consultants, residents followed by nursing officers (<70%) [Table 5]. This was contradictory to the study conducted in HCW showing that the physicians and nurses had significantly better knowledge as compared to other HCW.[16]
Table 5

Scoring according to designation

Designation scoringScore 15-23, n (%)Score 8-14, n (%)Score<8, n (%)
Consultants (n=31)26 (83.87)5 (16.12)0
Nursing officers (n=80)53 (66.25)27 (33.75)0
Resident (n=60)49 (81.66)11 (18.33)0
Intern (n=69)62 (89.85)5 (7.24)2 (2.8)
Scoring according to designation A study was conducted in HCWs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and South Korea revealed poor knowledge about the emerging disease, mode of transmission, and suboptimal infection control practice among the participants.[17] We should improve knowledge of this disease at each level of HCW to prevent the spread of disease as well as reduce morbidity. In this study, we have evaluated the awareness and precautions taken by HCWs, including post-graduate residents and interns. In the time of this crisis, the Health Ministry of India provisionally permitted senior medical undergraduates and interns to monitor and treat the patients infected with COVID 19. With this initiative of giving training to all interns and post-graduate residents, we can provide good care to a large number of infected patients and overcome the shortage of health-care workers.[1819]

Limitation of the study

The data presented in the study depends on participantshonesty and recall ability, which can lead to recall bias. It is a single center study, which has a limited number of participants. A multicenter study would have been better to assess the awareness about COVID 19 in HCWs. Despite these limitations, this study provided important information about the awareness and precautions taken by HCWs during the COVID pandemic.

Conclusion

The health-care workers have adequate knowledge about infection, precaution to be taken and a positive attitude for prevention of COVID 19. However, some areas have a gap in the source of information provided to gain adequate knowledge about the presentation and prevention of COVID 19 infections. Hence, we have the requirement of more educational training programs for HCW awareness, improvement of knowledge about COVID 19 transmission mode or isolation protocol, and precautionary measures against COVID 19. Thereby, HCWs can participate in this fight against COVID 19 with more efficiency and confidently.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  14 in total

1.  Effect of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Insomnia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Hong-Xing Wang; Li Wang; Wen-Rui Zhang; Qing Xue; Mao Peng; Zhi-Chao Sun; Li-Ping Li; Kun Wang; Xiao-Tong Yang; Yu Jia; Qi-Lin Zhou; Zhe-Xue Xu; Ning Li; Kai Dong; Qian Zhang; Hai-Qing Song; Shu-Qin Zhan; Bao-Quan Min; Chun-Qiu Fan; Ai-Hong Zhou; Xiu-Hua Guo; Hai-Bin Li; Li-Rong Liang; Lu Yin; Tian-Mei Si; Jing Huang; Tian-Yi Yan; Fiammetta Cosci; Atsushi Kamiya; Jie Lu; Yu-Ping Wang
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 17.659

Review 2.  Rehabilitation in endocrine patients: a novel psychosomatic approach.

Authors:  Nicoletta Sonino; Giovanni A Fava
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 17.659

3.  Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours of Healthcare Workers in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to MERS Coronavirus and Other Emerging Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  Abdullah J Alsahafi; Allen C Cheng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Hand Hygiene Practices Among Indian Medical Undergraduates: A Questionnaire-Based Survey.

Authors:  Pranav D Modi; Pooja Kumar; Rajavi Solanki; Janhavi Modi; Srinath Chandramani; Niharika Gill
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-07-12

5.  Mental Health and Psychosocial Problems of Medical Health Workers during the COVID-19 Epidemic in China.

Authors:  Wen-Rui Zhang; Kun Wang; Lu Yin; Wen-Feng Zhao; Qing Xue; Mao Peng; Bao-Quan Min; Qing Tian; Hai-Xia Leng; Jia-Lin Du; Hong Chang; Yuan Yang; Wei Li; Fang-Fang Shangguan; Tian-Yi Yan; Hui-Qing Dong; Ying Han; Yu-Ping Wang; Fiammetta Cosci; Hong-Xing Wang
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 17.659

6.  A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin.

Authors:  Peng Zhou; Xing-Lou Yang; Xian-Guang Wang; Ben Hu; Lei Zhang; Wei Zhang; Hao-Rui Si; Yan Zhu; Bei Li; Chao-Lin Huang; Hui-Dong Chen; Jing Chen; Yun Luo; Hua Guo; Ren-Di Jiang; Mei-Qin Liu; Ying Chen; Xu-Rui Shen; Xi Wang; Xiao-Shuang Zheng; Kai Zhao; Quan-Jiao Chen; Fei Deng; Lin-Lin Liu; Bing Yan; Fa-Xian Zhan; Yan-Yi Wang; Geng-Fu Xiao; Zheng-Li Shi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 69.504

7.  Knowledge and attitudes towards Middle East respiratory sydrome-coronavirus (MERS-CoV) among health care workers in south-western Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ahmed Asaad; Rehab El-Sokkary; Mahdi Alzamanan; Maher El-Shafei
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 1.628

8.  Quarantine, isolation and the duty of easy rescue in public health.

Authors:  Alberto Giubilini; Thomas Douglas; Hannah Maslen; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.294

9.  The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application.

Authors:  Stephen A Lauer; Kyra H Grantz; Qifang Bi; Forrest K Jones; Qulu Zheng; Hannah R Meredith; Andrew S Azman; Nicholas G Reich; Justin Lessler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  COVID-19 and the Risk to Health Care Workers: A Case Report.

Authors:  Kangqi Ng; Beng Hoong Poon; Troy Hai Kiat Puar; Jessica Li Shan Quah; Wann Jia Loh; Yu Jun Wong; Thean Yen Tan; Jagadesan Raghuram
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  7 in total

1.  COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and influence of professional medical guidance.

Authors:  Govind Nair; Kirthika Venkatesan; Arjun Nair; Irene N Firoz; Nisha Nigil Haroon
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2022-04-28

2.  Perceived stress and quality of life among frontline nurses fighting against COVID-19: A web-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sajedeh Amjadi; Sepideh Mohammadi; Ali Khojastehrad
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2022-04-28

3.  Health-care workers' experience of stressors and adaptation strategies for COVID-19: A qualitative research.

Authors:  Vajihe Atashi; Shahla Abolhasani; Atefeh Afshari
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2022-01-31

4.  Psychosocial perception of health-care workers in a COVID-19-designated hospital in eastern India.

Authors:  Subrata Das; Avik Chakraborty; Samatirtha Chandra
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2022-01-31

5.  Development and validation of English version of COVID-19 Depression Scale for health-care workers.

Authors:  Anusha Divvi; Shivashankar Kengadaran; Lakshmi Subhashini Katuri; Ravindranath Jampani; Jayashri Prabakar; Kavitha Muthukrishnan; Sivabalakumaran Kengadaran
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2021-12-31

6.  COVID-19: Distance learning to empower educators and health assistants in rural areas.

Authors:  Maria do Carmo Barros de Melo; Priscila Menezes Ferri; Monica Maria Almeida de Vasconcelos; Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis; Solange Cervinho Bicalho Godoy; Vitória Andrade Palmeira; Gabriel Rocha; Rosalia Morais Torres; Unaí Tupinambás
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2022-06-30

7.  Awareness and understanding of COVID-19 among pregnant woman in Northern India.

Authors:  Manisha Jhirwal; Pratibha Singh; Charu Sharma; Priyanka Kathuria; Shashank Shekhar; Satya Prakash Meena
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2022-06-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.