| Literature DB >> 34084836 |
Azam Karimi Vanestanagh1, Azizeh Farshbaf-Khalili2, Khalil Esmaeilpour3, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi4, Niloufar Sattarzadeh Jahdi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Education by smartphone-based software is a new method among the world's educational practices. Due to the lack of studies on the effect of this education on promoting knowledge and self-care behaviors of students' reproductive health this study aimed to determine the effect of smartphone-based software education on knowledge and self-care behaviors in the field of reproductive health.Entities:
Keywords: Knowledge; mobile application; reproductive health; self-care; smart phone; software
Year: 2021 PMID: 34084836 PMCID: PMC8150067 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_548_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Educ Health Promot ISSN: 2277-9531
Figure 1Flow Diagram of the study
Demographic characteristics of participants in the intervention and control groups
| Variable | Intervention ( | Control ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 24.4 (4.2)† | 23.03† | 0.002** |
| 26-36 | 28 (34.1) | 16 (19.5) | 0.052# |
| 18-25 | 54 (65.9) | 66 (80.5) | |
| Level of education | |||
| Bachelor | 49 (59.8) | 56 (68.3) | 0.004& |
| Master degree | 27 (32.9) | 11 (13.1) | |
| PhD or medical assistant | 6 (7.3) | 15 (18.3) | |
| Having sexual relation | 62 (75.6) | 61 (74.4) | 1.000# |
| Pregnancy history | 12 (14.6) | 12 (14.6) | 1.000# |
| Having kids | 9 (11) | 9 (11) | 1.000# |
| Unwanted pregnancy | 5 (6.1) | 6 (7.3) | 1.000# |
| Abortion | 2 (2.4) | 4 (4.9) | 0.682# |
| Economic status | |||
| Middle | 71 (86.6) | 64 (78) | 0.219# |
| High | 11 (13.4) | 18 (22) | |
| Husband’s education | |||
| High school graduate or lower | 11 (13.4) | 11 (13.4) | 0.156& |
| Bachelor | 53 (64.6) | 41 (50) | |
| Postgraduate | 18 (21.9) | 30 (36.6) | |
| Husband’s job | |||
| Self-employee | 40 (48.8) | 31 (37.8) | 0.078$ |
| Employee | 29 (35.4) | 26 (31.7) | |
| Another | 13 (15.9) | 25 (30.5) | |
| Marriage | |||
| Living with spouse | 61 (74.4) | 61 (74.4) | 1.000# |
| Separate | 21 (25.6) | 21 (25.6) |
†These variables were reported as mean (standard deviation), **Independent t-test, #Fisher’s exact test, $Chi-square test, &Chi-square-by trend
Comparison of the mean knowledge score on reproductive health and its subdomains among the study groups
| Variable | Mean (SD) | Adjusted differences (95% confidence interval) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Control group | |||
| Total knowledge (0-40) | ||||
| Baseline | 19.7 (6.5) | 20.6 (7.4) | - | 0.405 |
| After intervention | 31.2 (6.8) | 22.4 (7.5) | 8.8 (6.5-11.1) | <0.001 |
| General reproductive health (0-14) | ||||
| Baseline | 8.5 (2.4) | 8.4 (2.9) | - | 0.792 |
| After intervention | 11.5 (2) | 9 (2.8) | 2.5 (1.9-3.1) | <0.001 |
| Sexual transmitted diseases (0-9) | ||||
| Baseline | 3.7 (1.8) | 3.8 (2) | - | 0.744 |
| After intervention | 6.9 (1.8) | 4.5 (2.1) | 2.5 (1.9-3.1) | <0.001 |
| Family planning (0-8) | ||||
| Baseline | 2.1 (2.1) | 3.1 (2.1) | - | 0.004 |
| After intervention | 5.5 (2.2) | 3.1 (2.2) | 2.9 (2.3-3.5) | <0.001 |
| Disorders* (0-9) | ||||
| Baseline | 5.4 (1.8) | 5.3 (2.07) | - | 0.841 |
| After intervention | 7.3 (1.7) | 5.6 (2.03) | 1.6 (1.1-2.1) | <0.001 |
Independent t-test was used to compare baseline values and ANCOVA adjusted for baseline values was used to compare after intervention values. for . *Disorders included gynecological cancers, infertility. SD=Standard deviation
Comparison of the mean self-care score on reproductive health and its subdomains among the groups
| Variable | Mean (SD) | Adjusted differences (95% confidence interval) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Control group | |||
| Total self-care (40-200) | ||||
| Baseline | 147.6 (20.5) | 146.5 (26.1) | - | 0.748 |
| After intervention | 162 (18) | 151.3 (26.6) | 11.6 (6.7-16.5) | <0.001 |
| General reproductive health* (10-50) | ||||
| Baseline | 37.6 (5.1) | 36.8 (6.8) | - | 0.400 |
| After intervention | 41 (4.9) | 37.9 (6.7) | 2.8 (1.4-4.2) | <0.001 |
| Sexual transmitted diseases (11-55) | ||||
| Baseline | 42.8 (7.4) | 42.6 (8.1) | - | 0.843 |
| After intervention | 45.7 (5.9) | 43.3 (7.5) | 2.7 (0.9-4.4) | 0.003 |
| Family planning (5-25) | ||||
| Baseline | 17.8 (4.4) | 18.2 (4.6) | - | 0.501 |
| After intervention | 19.3 (4.1) | 18.9 (4.5) | 0.63 (−0.57-1.8) | 0.298 |
| Disorders** (14-70) | ||||
| Baseline | 49.5 (8.4) | 48.9 (11) | - | 0.685 |
| After intervention | 56.1 (8.2) | 51.1 (11.6) | 5.2 (3-7.4) | <0.001 |
Independent t-test was used to compare baseline values and ANCOVA adjusted for baseline values was used to compare after intervention.values.*Disorders included gynecological cancers, infertility. SD=Standard deviation