Literature DB >> 34084533

Stinging abdominal pain at 32 gestational weeks with prior classical uterine incision: Careful assessment or emergency cesarean delivery?

Aiko Kakigano1,2, Shinya Matsuzaki1,3, Yasuto Kinose1, Toshihiro Kimura1, Tadashi Kimura1.   

Abstract

The risk of uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancy is 1%-12% in patients with prior classical uterine incision. Management of mild/moderate abdominal pain without an obvious abnormal finding before 36 weeks is challenging owing to fetal immaturity.
© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  classical uterine incision; uterine rupture

Year:  2021        PMID: 34084533      PMCID: PMC8143273          DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.4344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Case Rep        ISSN: 2050-0904


CASE NOTES

Prior classical uterine incision is linked to a high rate of uterine rupture. Abdominal pain may be a uterine rupture symptom, but the management for stinging pain occurring at 32 gestational weeks without apparent abnormal finding remains uncertain. Herein, we present a related case with meaningful images. A 41‐year‐old woman at 32 gestational weeks with prior classical uterine incision complained of stinging lower right abdominal pain with normal vital signs and fetal heart rate. Uterine dehiscence and intra‐abdominal bleeding were detected by contrast computed tomography (2 hours after the first pain) (Figures 1A‐B), thereby diagnosed as uterine rupture. Hence, the patient underwent an emergency cesarean delivery (CD) (3.5 hours after the first pain) of a female infant weighing 1746 g with Apgar scores of 8 and 7, at 1 and 5 min, respectively. Laparotomy revealed amniotic membrane protrusion from the anterior uterine wall (Figure 1C). Both the mother and the infant recovered well and were eventually discharged.
FIGURE 1

A, Abdominal contrast computed tomography revealed a small amount of intra‐abdominal bleeding (yellow arrows), which was not detected by transabdominal ultrasonography. This finding suggests the cause of abdominal pain. B, Uterine dehiscence in the middle of the uterine body was detected through careful monitoring; the suspected cause was a scar from prior classical uterine incision. Uterine dehiscence and bleeding indicate uterine rupture; thus, an emergency cesarean delivery was performed. C, Intraoperative laparotomy imaging confirmed the presence of uterine scar dehiscence and bleeding; the maternal head is visible on the right. Amniotic membrane protrusion (white arrow) and the lower edge of the placenta (black arrow) are visible from the anterior uterine wall

A, Abdominal contrast computed tomography revealed a small amount of intra‐abdominal bleeding (yellow arrows), which was not detected by transabdominal ultrasonography. This finding suggests the cause of abdominal pain. B, Uterine dehiscence in the middle of the uterine body was detected through careful monitoring; the suspected cause was a scar from prior classical uterine incision. Uterine dehiscence and bleeding indicate uterine rupture; thus, an emergency cesarean delivery was performed. C, Intraoperative laparotomy imaging confirmed the presence of uterine scar dehiscence and bleeding; the maternal head is visible on the right. Amniotic membrane protrusion (white arrow) and the lower edge of the placenta (black arrow) are visible from the anterior uterine wall Uterine rupture correlates with high fetal mortality rates (26.2%). In classical uterine incision, the risk of uterine rupture is 1%‐12%, which is rather high, considering the overall risk of 0.1%‐0.5% for patients with prior CD. In prior classical CD cases, 70% of uterine ruptures occur at <36 gestational weeks and are associated with high fetal mortality rates caused by rapid fetal deterioration. Fetal immaturity at <36 gestational weeks complicates the management of mild‐to‐moderate abdominal pain—either immediate CD or careful monitoring—especially without abnormal findings.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

AK, SM, YK, and TK (Toshihiro Kimura): made substantial contributions to the conception and design of this manuscript, collected the clinical data, and drafted and revised the manuscript. TK (Tadashi Kimura): conceived and generally supervised the study and gave final approval for publication of this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

This study conforms to the Declaration of Helsinki and is approved by the Osaka University Institutional Review Board (no. 15240).
  2 in total

1.  Infant outcome after complete uterine rupture.

Authors:  Iqbal Al-Zirqi; Anne Kjersti Daltveit; Siri Vangen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Optimal timing and mode of delivery after cesarean with previous classical incision or myomectomy: a review of the data.

Authors:  Mark B Landon; Courtney D Lynch
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.300

  2 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Maternal and Fetal Outcomes after Prior Mid-Trimester Uterine Rupture: A Systematic Review with Our Experience.

Authors:  Shinya Matsuzaki; Tsuyoshi Takiuchi; Takeshi Kanagawa; Satoko Matsuzaki; Misooja Lee; Michihide Maeda; Masayuki Endo; Tadashi Kimura
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.430

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.