Literature DB >> 34084365

Reversible reduction drives anion ejection and C60 binding within an FeII 4L6 cage.

Zhenpin Lu1, Tanya K Ronson1, Jonathan R Nitschke1.   

Abstract

FeII 4L6 tetrahedral cage 1 was prepared from a redox-active dicationic naphthalenediimide (NDI) ligand. The +20 charge of the cage makes it a good host for anionic guests, with no binding observed for neutral aromatic molecules. Following reduction by Cp2Co, the cage released anionic guests; subsequent oxidation by AgNTf2 led to re-uptake of anions. In its reduced form, however, 1 was observed to bind neutral C60. The fullerene guest was subsequently ejected following cage re-oxidation. The guest release process was found to be facilitated by anion-mediated transport from organic to aqueous solution. Cage 1 thus employs electron transfer as a stimulus to control the uptake and release of both neutral and charged guests, through distinct pathways. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 34084365      PMCID: PMC8146419          DOI: 10.1039/c9sc05728e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Sci        ISSN: 2041-6520            Impact factor:   9.825


Introduction

Self-assembled metal–organic cages[1] have found uses across various fields, ranging from chemical separations,[2] catalyzing organic reactions,[3] sensing specific analytes[4] and acting as photoreactors,[5] among others. These applications are often based on encapsulation of guests within the well-defined inner cavities of cages. Guest uptake and release by a host molecule can be controlled using stimuli such as heat,[6] light,[7] pH[8] and competing guests,[9] as understanding has increased as to how to design stimuli-responsive behaviour.[10] The use of redox stimuli is particularly attractive[11] because electrons are ‘clean’ stimuli, producing no chemical by-products. Thus far, several redox-active metal–organic cages have been successfully synthesized.[11] Recently Sallé, Goeb and co-workers reported several tetrathiafulvalene based coordination cages, which can reversibly uptake and release perfluorocarborate[11] or corronene[11] guests under redox control. Inspired by these achievements, we sought to develop new redox-active metal–organic cage systems capable of reversible guest uptake. In the present system, electron transfer was used to stimulate the uptake and release of both anionic and neutral guests, via distinct pathways. Naphthalenediimides (NDIs) and their derivatives are redox-active electron-deficient compounds, and can be readily substituted with a wide variety of functional groups,[12] making them ideal building blocks for metal–organic cages.[13] We have reported several NDI-diamine based tetrahedral metal–organic cages, with the redox behaviour of one catalyzing the oxidative coupling of arylborates to give biphenyls.[14] However, reduction of that cage[14] resulted in precipitation due to charge neutralization. This behaviour prevented further study of its redox dependent host–guest chemistry in solution. In order to solve this issue, we designed a new dicationic subcomponent, A (Fig. 1). We hypothesised that the permanent charges of A would improve the solubility of the corresponding cage 1, following reduction of the NDI moieties. This FeII4L6 cage, 1, did indeed remain in solution upon NDI reduction, enabling different guests to be taken up and released upon reduction and oxidation of the cage.
Fig. 1

The synthesis of FeII4L6 cage 1 (top) and crystal structure of 1 with three carborate anions encapsulated (bottom). Cage hydrogen atoms, counterions, solvents and disorder are omitted for clarity.

Results and discussion

Tetrahedral FeII4L6 cage 1 was synthesized from quaternary-ammonium-functionalized NDI subcomponent A (6 equiv.), 2-formylpyridine (12 equiv.) and Fe(NTf2)2 (4 equiv.) in acetonitrile (Fig. 1). The 1H NMR spectrum of 1 was consistent with a single symmetric species (Fig. S2–S7†). ESI-MS of 1 confirmed the formation of an assembly with FeII4L6 stoichiometry (Fig. S8–S11†). Subcomponent A was not observed to form the Zn4L6 analogue of 1 when Zn(NTf2)2 was used in place of the iron salt. We infer this lack of reactivity to be due to the weaker metal–ligand bonds involving zinc not being able to compensate for coulombic repulsion among the cationic ligands. Single crystals of 1 were obtained from vapour diffusion of diisopropyl ether into an acetonitrile solution of 1 containing cesium carborane (10 equiv.). The crystal structure of 1 revealed a T-symmetric framework (Fig. 1), with six ligands bridging four octahedral iron(ii) centres of the same handedness. The solid state structure is consistent with NMR data, in which all ligands are magnetically equivalent. The metalmetal distances are in the range 18.771(3)–19.345(2) Å (average 19.1 Å). The NDI moieties lie tangent to the edges of the tetrahedron, affording an enclosed cavity which is further blocked by the –(CH2)2N+(Me)3 substituents of the ligands. A cavity volume of 1100 Å3 was determined using VOIDOO[15] (Fig. S26†). Three carborate anions were found in the cavity in the solid state. The electrochemical properties of cage 1 and subcomponent A were investigated by cyclic voltammetry, carried out in 0.1 M Bu4N+Tf2N− in MeCN at a scan rate of 500 mV s−1. Similar to other NDI derivatives,[14,16] cage 1 exhibited a quasi-reversible process upon reduction (Fig. 2), in which the first reduction wave appeared at −0.81 V vs. Fc/Fc* and the second occurred at −1.19 V. The related oxidation waves were found at −1.29 and −0.78 V. Reduction was reversible over several cycles. In comparison, two similar reduction waves (at −0.96 and −1.36 V) were also observed for subcomponent A (Fig. S25†). However, the intensity of the CV signals decreased with each cycle in the case of A, consistent with irreversible reactions following redox events for A, but not for 1. We thus infer that self-assembly rendered the NDI panels more robust to redox processes.
Fig. 2

Cyclic voltammetry (5 scans, 500 mV s−1) of 1 in MeCN (0.1 M Bu4N+Tf2N−) at 25 °C.

In light of our electrochemical studies, we investigated the reactions of 1 with chemical reductants and oxidants. Cp2Co and AgNTf2 were selected as an appropriate one-electron reductant and oxidant, respectively, for 1. Following the addition of Cp2Co (10 equiv.), a sharp signal attributed to Cp2Co+ appeared at 5.67 ppm in the 1H NMR spectrum, indicating that cage reduction had occurred. Following reduction, the cage signals became NMR silent due to the formation of radical species, as was observed previously in the case of related systems.[14,17] When AgNTf2 (12 equiv.) was added to the mixture, the cage signals reappeared cleanly (Fig. S41†), demonstrating the reversibility of the process. Next we investigated the binding behaviour of 1 with various prospective guests using 1H NMR spectroscopy in CD3CN. Cage 1 did not show measurable affinity towards the neutral species investigated (Fig. 3 and S27–S32†) despite the enclosed cavity observed in the crystal structure (Fig. 1).
Fig. 3

Top, neutral aromatic non-guests and anionic guests for cage 1; bottom, a stacked plot of the 1H NMR titration (500 MHz, 298 K) of KBF3Ph into a solution of 1 (0.17 mM) in CD3CN. The signals from the guest (KBF3Ph) have been labelled with red and blue dots, and the others belong to cage 1.

Only the anions BF4−, PhBF3− and CB11H12− were observed to bind in fast exchange on the NMR chemical-shift timescale (Fig. 3 and S33–S40†). For instance, the 1H NMR signals of PhBF3− were shifted upfield by up to 0.91 ppm in the presence of 1. Similar chemical shift changes were also observed in the 19F NMR spectrum of this anion (Fig. S37†); host signals were also observed to shift in the presence of guests. However, the binding stoichiometries of these anions in cage 1 could not be established due to their fast exchange binding, and attempts to crystallize these host–guest adducts were also not successful. The 19F NMR signal of triflimide shifted upon the addition of KBF3Ph, suggesting that the encapsulated Tf2N− anions were released in the presence of the competing guest PhBF3− (Fig. S36†). We infer the cationic nature of subcomponent A to impart the cage with a higher binding affinity for anionic guests relative to neutral guests. PhBF3− was chosen as a model guest to probe the binding behaviour of 1 under redox control. During the stepwise addition of Cp2Co, the 1H NMR signals of PhBF3− gradually shifted downfield, towards the values for the free guest (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Redox control of KBF3Ph binding within 1.

We infer the reduction of the NDI panels of 1 to result in repulsion between the anionic guest and the reduced cage panels, leading to release of the bound guests. The signals of 1 broadened into the baseline during the reduction process due to the formation of radical anion species. After the addition of 10 equivalents of Cp2Co, the 1H NMR signals of PhBF3− were found at the same chemical shift values as the free anion, suggesting complete ejection of the guest from the cage cavity. Full recovery of the 1H NMR spectrum of PhBF3− ⊂ 1 was observed after the addition of AgNTf2 (12 equiv.). We next investigated the use of electron transfer to control the uptake and release and of neutral molecules. Although cage 1 possesses a +20 charge, which favours the binding of anions, we reasoned that reduction of the NDI panels with Cp2Co would partially neutralize the charge and potentially modify the guest preference. The X-ray structure of 1 (Fig. 1) suggested that cage 1 would have a suitable volume (Fig. S26†) to accommodate C60, and analogous cages have been shown to bind fullerenes well.[14,18] C60 thus appeared to be an ideal guest molecule to test the catch-and-release cycle shown in Fig. 5. This cycle is inferred to have three distinct stages. First, after the addition of Cp2Co, reduced cage 1 released the anionic guest in favour of neutral C60. Second, treatment with AgNTf2 oxidized the cage back to its initial state, giving C60 ⊂ 1 as a kinetically-trapped species. Third, the thermodynamically-unfavourable C60 ⊂ 1 released neutral C60, generating the more stable triflimide adduct.
Fig. 5

The encapsulation and release of C60 within cage 1 following reduction and subsequent re-oxidation.

To test the cycle of Fig. 5, a solution of reduced cage 1, prepared through addition of Cp2Co (10 equiv.) to 1 in CD3CN, was mixed with C60 (4 equiv.), and the mixture was kept at room temperature overnight. AgNTf2 (12 equiv.) was added to oxidize the cage back to its initial state. The presence of C60 was confirmed by 13C NMR (Fig. S15 and S21†) in CD3CN, a solvent in which free C60 displays negligible solubility.[19] Cage 1 exhibited T point symmetry in solution, as reflected in its 1H NMR spectra,[20] however, the encapsulation of C60 within 1 resulted in the formation of diastereomers having all possible combinations of Δ and Λ metal stereochemistries with T, S4, and C3 point symmetries (Fig. S13†).[13] Interestingly, the C60 ⊂ 1 complex was found to be a kinetically trapped species. After 5 days the S4 and C3 diastereomers[20] (Fig. S19†) of C60 ⊂ 1 released their encapsulated C60 with concomitant formation of free 1 and a reduction in the intensity of 13C NMR signal for C60 (Fig. S21†). Only the T diastereomer[20] of C60 ⊂ 1 (14% by 1H NMR integration) remained in solution after 30 days, indicating its greater kinetic stability relative to the other diastereomers of C60 ⊂ 1 (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6

The release of C60 from C60 ⊂ 1 monitored by 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3CN) over the course of a month.

Counteranions have been shown to drive the phase transfer of cationic coordination cages, permitting guests to be conveyed across phase boundaries.[1] The treatment of a solution of cage 1 in MeCN/EtOAc (1 : 1) with aqueous Na2SO4 resulted in transfer of 1 from the organic phase into water (Fig. S42 and S43†) as the sulfate salt.[1] Treatment with aqueous Na2SO4 likewise stimulated phase transfer of the C60 ⊂ 1 host–guest complex. This complex, however, was observed to release C60 upon phase transfer, allowing cargo recovery by filtration (Fig. 7, S44 and S45†). This novel use of phase transfer to effect guest ejection could enable new means of chemical purification, whereby a guest is separated from its recyclable host in a single step, rather than requiring a separate purification step.[21]
Fig. 7

(a) Mixture of cage 1 and C60 in MeCN. (b) Formation of C60 ⊂ 1. (c) The release of C60 and transfer of cage 1 from the EtOAc/MeCN to the water layer.

Conclusions

In this study, we reported a new redox-switchable FeII4L6 tetrahedral cage. Although, the cage shows binding affinity for anionic guests, following reduction the cage was observed to encapsulate neutral C60 with ejection of the anionic guests. Current efforts are focused on expanding redox-stimulated guest uptake and release to a broader set of guest species, and applying these concepts to design new systems where electrical energy may be used directly to effect chemical separations and transport.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.
  53 in total

1.  Reversible Guest Uptake/Release by Redox-Controlled Assembly/Disassembly of a Coordination Cage.

Authors:  Vincent Croué; Sébastien Goeb; György Szalóki; Magali Allain; Marc Sallé
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Manipulating liquid-crystal properties using a pH activated hydrazone switch.

Authors:  Xin Su; Sahag Voskian; Russell P Hughes; Ivan Aprahamian
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Orthogonal Stimuli Trigger Self-Assembly and Phase Transfer of FeII4L4 Cages and Cargoes.

Authors:  Anna J McConnell; Cally J E Haynes; Angela B Grommet; Catherine M Aitchison; Julia Guilleme; Sigitas Mikutis; Jonathan R Nitschke
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Reversible C60 Ejection from a Metallocage through the Redox-Dependent Binding of a Competitive Guest.

Authors:  Cédric Colomban; György Szalóki; Magali Allain; Laura Gómez; Sébastien Goeb; Marc Sallé; Miquel Costas; Xavi Ribas
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 5.236

5.  Directed Phase Transfer of an FeII4L4 Cage and Encapsulated Cargo.

Authors:  Angela B Grommet; Jonathan R Nitschke
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Functional Naphthalene Diimides: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications.

Authors:  Mohammad Al Kobaisi; Sidhanath V Bhosale; Kay Latham; Aaron M Raynor; Sheshanath V Bhosale
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Alkane oxidation via photochemical excitation of a self-assembled molecular cage.

Authors:  Michito Yoshizawa; Sachiko Miyagi; Masaki Kawano; Katsuya Ishiguro; Makoto Fujita
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Catalysis in a Cationic Coordination Cage Using a Cavity-Bound Guest and Surface-Bound Anions: Inhibition, Activation, and Autocatalysis.

Authors:  William Cullen; Alexander J Metherell; Ashley B Wragg; Christopher G P Taylor; Nicholas H Williams; Michael D Ward
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  A Pd8 Tetrafacial Molecular Barrel as Carrier for Water Insoluble Fluorophore.

Authors:  Bijan Roy; Aloke Kumar Ghosh; Shubhi Srivastava; Patrick D'Silva; Partha Sarathi Mukherjee
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Chemistry and structure of a host-guest relationship: the power of NMR and X-ray diffraction in tandem.

Authors:  Qi-Qiang Wang; Victor W Day; Kristin Bowman-James
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  3 in total

1.  Gram-scale synthesis of a covalent nanocage that preserves the redox properties of encapsulated fullerenes.

Authors:  Daniel A Rothschild; William P Kopcha; Aaron Tran; Jianyuan Zhang; Mark C Lipke
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 9.969

2.  Dynamic Covalent Self-Assembly of Chloride- and Ion-Pair-Templated Cryptates.

Authors:  Selina Hollstein; Oleksandr Shyshov; Marko Hanževački; Jie Zhao; Tamara Rudolf; Christof M Jäger; Max von Delius
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 16.823

3.  Coordination Cages Selectively Transport Molecular Cargoes Across Liquid Membranes.

Authors:  Bao-Nguyen T Nguyen; John D Thoburn; Angela B Grommet; Duncan J Howe; Tanya K Ronson; Hugh P Ryan; Jeanne L Bolliger; Jonathan R Nitschke
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 15.419

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.