| Literature DB >> 34084075 |
Janna Cropotova1, Revilija Mozuraityte2, Inger Beate Standal2, Olga Szulecka3, Tomasz Kulikowski3, Adam Mytlewski3, Turid Rustad1.
Abstract
RESEARCHEntities:
Keywords: Atlantic mackerel; NMR metabolomics; fish cake; haddock; nucleotides; quality parameters; sensory attributes
Year: 2021 PMID: 34084075 PMCID: PMC8157089 DOI: 10.17113/ftb.59.01.21.6695
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Technol Biotechnol ISSN: 1330-9862 Impact factor: 3.918
Lipid content and fatty acid composition of haddock and mackerel mince and fish cakes prepared thereof
| Composition | Raw material | Fish cake | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mackerel | Haddock | 0 | 25 | 50 | |
| 22.1±0.5 | 0.7±0.1 | 2.0±0.1 | 6.5±0.1 | 9.9±0.1 | |
| saturated | (25.3±0.4)c | (29.5±0.4)b | (36.2±0.1)a | (29.1±0.1)b | (28.6±1.5)b |
| monounsaturated | (45.7±0.6)a | (18.9±0.2)d | (41.1±0.1)c | (43.2±0.1)b | (45.0±0.8)a,b |
| polyunsaturated | (29.0±0.2)b | (51.6±0.5)a | (22.8±0.1)d | (27.7±0.1)b,c | (26.4±0.7)c |
| (3890±16)a | (199±3)d | (183±3)d | (943±18)c | (1296±135)b | |
The same letter in each column determines no statistical difference among the values of fish cakes. Different letters denote significant differences in ANOVA
Physicochemical characteristics of fish cakes prepared from mackerel and haddock minces
| Peroxide value | Hardness/N | Cohesiveness | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| μeq/kg | µmol/kg | ||||||||
| 0 | (87±11)c | (43.5±5.5)c | (0.2±0.0)c | (0.2±0.1)c | (81.2±0.4)a | (-2.2±0.1)a | (9.0±0.2)a | (99.3±12.4)a | (0.6±0.3)a |
| 25 | (465±38)b | (232.5±19.0)b | (0.6±0.0)b | (2.7±0.3)b | (77.5±0.5)a,b | (-1.4±0.2)b | (10.6±0.3)a, b | (82.1±11.3)b | (0.5±0.3)a,b |
| 50 | (786±49)a | (394.5±24.5)a | (0.8±0.1)a | (3.5±0.1)a | (73.9±0.6)b,c | (-0.8±0.1)c | (11.6±0.2)b,c | (70.5±5.4)c | (0.4±0.1)b,c |
The same letter in each column denotes no statistical difference among the values of fish cakes. Different letters denote significant differences in ANOVA. w(TBARS)1=thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in methanol/water phase, w(TBARS)2=thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in chloroform phase, L* value=lightness, a*=redness and b*=yellowness
Frequency statistics for the acceptability index of individual products
| Point range | Acceptability index | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| % | |||
| 0 | 2–3 | 5 | 20.0 |
| 4–5 | 7 | 28.0 | |
| 6–7 | 6 | 24.0 | |
| 50 | 2 – 3 | 6 | 24.0 |
| 4 – 5 | 5 | 20.0 | |
| 6 – 7 | 6 | 24.0 | |
| 25 | 2 – 3 | 3 | 12.0 |
| 4 – 5 | 11 | 44.0 | |
| 6 – 7 | 2 | 8.0 | |
One-way ANOVA test for the acceptability index of individual products between the three age groups
| Age group | F-value | df | P-value | η2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18-30 | 31-54 | 55+ | |||||
| Mean | |||||||
| 0 | 4.2±2.4 | 5.7±2.4 | 5.9±1.8 | 1.53 | 2, 17.70 | 0.244 | 0.07 |
| 25 | 5.0±1.3 | 5.3±2.3 | 6.0±2.3 | 1.14 | 2, 25.32 | 0.336 | 0.03 |
| 50 | 7.0±1.5 | 4.9±2.3 | 6.1±2.4 | 3.76* | 2, 23.74 | ||
df=degrees of freedom, P-value=level of marginal significance within a statistical hypothesis test, η2=proportion of variance accounted for by a factor
Analysis of Pearson's correlation between sensory characteristics and the acceptability index of fish cakes
| Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Acceptability index | --- | ||||||
| 2. Meat structure | 0.47*** | --- | |||||
| 3. Meat colour | 0.45*** | 0.60*** | --- | ||||
| 4. Aroma acceptability | 0.49*** | 0.52*** | 0.56*** | --- | |||
| 5. Aroma intensity | 0.26** | 0.18* | 0.14 | 0.26** | --- | ||
| 6. Saltiness | 0.14* | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.30*** | --- | |
| 7. Firmness | -0.23** | -0.15* | 0.02 | -0.03 | -0.18* | 0.35*** | --- |
| 8. Juiciness | 0.61*** | 0.34*** | 0.23** | 0.17* | 0.30*** | 0.36*** | -0.55*** |
0.05
Coefficients of a linear regression model predicting the acceptability index values of fish cakes based on sensory descriptors and component acceptability
| Model | Predicator | B | SE | β | t | F | df | p | R2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptability index | Constant | -0.72 | 0.95 | -0.76 | 35.95 | 7.132 | <0.001 | 0.64 | ||||
| Meat structure | -0.02 | 0.11 | -0.01 | -0.17 | ||||||||
| Meat colour | 0.28 | 0.10 | 2.71** | |||||||||
| Aroma acceptability | 0.48 | 0.10 | 4.74*** | |||||||||
| Aroma intensity | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 1.08 | ||||||||
| Saltiness | -0.33 | 0.08 | -4.14*** | |||||||||
| Firmness | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.64 | ||||||||
| Juiciness | 0.68 | 0.08 | 9.01*** | |||||||||
**p<0.01, ***p<0.001. Constant=y-intercept, B=unstandardized beta, SE=standard error; β=standardized B coefficients; t=t test, F=F-value, df=degrees of freedom, p=p-value (test probability), R2=coefficient of determination
Low-molecular-mass metabolites quantified in raw material and prepared fish cakes with different levels of haddock and mackerel
| Raw material | Fish cake | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haddock | Mackerel | 0 | 25 | 50 | |
| Acetate | (1.7±0.5)a | (1.2±0.1)a | (2.3±1.1)a | (2.0±0.1)a | (2.1±0.1)a |
| Alanine | (14.9±1.2)c | (28.6±2.5)a | (12.0±2.2)c | (15.7±0.2)bc | (19.8±1.7)b |
| Anserine | (236±36) | n.d. | (146±14)a# | (122±78)a# | (91±7)b# |
| Citrate | n.d. | n.d. | (44±1.6)a# | (44.1±2.4)a# | (39.6±4.0)a# |
| Creatine | (506±50)a | (427±54)ab | (346±12)bc | (328±18)c | (323±22)c |
| Creatinine | (0.1±0.1)b | (0.5±0.9)b | (8.2±2.1)a | (7.5±1.4)a | (10.4±1.8)a |
| Dimethylamine | (1.9±0.5)a | (1.1±0.2)b | (2.0±0.1)a | (2.5±0.2)a | (2.1±0.3)a |
| Formate | (0.4±0.2)ab | (0.2±0.1)b | (0.6±0.1)a | (0.5±0.04)a | (0.53±0.02)a |
| Glutamate | (8.7±1.4)d | (46.7±5.4)a | (12.5±2.0)cd | (16.6±0.5)bc | (22.7±2.1)b |
| Glycerol | (3.9±2.2)b | (261±3)a | * | * | * |
| Glycine | (12.1±1.7)a | (12.7±0.8)a | * | * | * |
| Histamine | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| Histidine | (3.3±0.4)** | (365±114)** | (3.0±0.2)c# | (66±2)b# | (105±18)a# |
| Hypoxanthine | (3.0±1.2)b | (6±0.4)a | (1.6±0.2)b | (2.9±0.3)d | (2.5±1.3)b |
| IMP | (134±27)a | (74±34)b | (66±2)b | (73±23)b | (58±4)b |
| Imidazole | (6.9±4.0)a | (1.1±1.0)b | (4.9±1.2)ab | (3.8±0.1)ab | (2.7±0.6)ab |
| Inosine | (62±25)ab | (90±1)a | (54±3)b | (43±2)b | (59±2)b |
| Isoleucine | (1.9±0.3)c | (4.9±0.1)a | (1.8±0.4)c | (2.40±0.03)c | (3.3±0.4)b |
| Lactate | (387±30)ab | (415±87)a | (273±4)c | (303±4)bc | (315±6)abc |
| Lactose | n.d. | n.d. | (1203±58)a | (1325±160)a | (1177±70)a |
| Leucine | (3.6±0.34)c | (9.8±1.3)a | (3.0±1.3)c | (5±0.1)bc | (7.2±0.5)b |
| Lysine | (7.6±0.6)cd | (33±2.7)a | (3.8±1.0)d | (11.0±0.2)bc | (14.4±4.1)b |
| Methionine | (1.9±0.5)bc | (4.4±0.1)a | (1.3±0.1)c | (2.3±0.1)b | (2.3±0.4)b |
| Phenylalanine | (1.4±0.6)c | (5.1±0.6)a | (1.4±0.6)c | (2.24±0.04)bc | (3.3±0.4)b |
| Succinate | (0.2±0.2)c | (0.17±0.006)c | (0.69±0.02)b | (0.93±0.01)ab | (1.2±0.1)a |
| Taurine | (63±5)ab | (72±6)a | (50±3)c | (60±1)abc | (56±7)bc |
| Trimethylamine | (0.1±0.1)c | (0.9±0.3)b | (0.7±0.1)bc | (1.5±0.4)a | (2.1±0.2)a |
| TMAO | (353±38)a | (138±18)d | (256±8)b | (215±9)bc | (180±11)cd |
| Tyrosine | (2.0±0.7)cd | (8.0±0.9)a | (1.2±0.1)d | (2.8±0.1)bc | (4.1±0.23)b |
| Valine | (3.2±0.4)c | (9.5±0.9)a | (3.0±0.9)c | (4.36±0.05)bc | (5.9±0.5)b |
| β-Alanine | (6.9±2.0)a | n.d. | (7.0±0.5)a | (4.9±0.1)ab | (4.0±0.4)b |
Data are expressed in mg/100 g on wet mass basis (average with standard deviations, N=3). Different letters denote significant differences in ANOVA. For some metabolites, ANOVA was run only on the different fish cake samples, and these are denoted with #. **For histidine, the t-test showed differences in mean values of histidine for haddock and mackerel raw materials. n.d.=not determined
Fig. 1K-value (ratio of inosine and hypoxanthine to the sum of all adenosine triphosphate-related catabolites) for haddock and mackerel and fish cakes (FC) prepared thereof with different mass ratios of haddock and mackerel: 100:0, 75:25 and 50:50%