Literature DB >> 34083318

Limitations in health professionals' knowledge of end-of-life law: a cross-sectional survey.

Ben P White1, Lindy Willmott1, Rachel Feeney2, Penny Neller1, Shin-Ning Then1, Jamie Bryant3, Amy Waller3, Patsy Yates4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insufficient knowledge about end-of-life law can impede the provision of safe and high-quality end-of-life care. Accurate legal knowledge across health professions is critical in palliative and end-of-life settings given the reliance on multidisciplinary care. Most research has focused on doctors, finding significant knowledge gaps. The limited evidence about other health professions also suggests legal knowledge deficits.
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare levels of knowledge about end-of-life law across a broad sample of Australian health professionals and medical students, and to identify predictors of legal knowledge.
METHODS: An online pre-training survey was completed by participants enrolled in a national training programme on end-of-life law. The optional survey collected demographic data and measured baseline legal knowledge and attitudes towards end-of-life law.
RESULTS: Response rate was 67% (1653/2456). The final sample for analysis (n=1564, 95% of respondents), included doctors, medical students, nurses and a range of allied health professionals. Doctors and nurses had slightly higher levels of legal knowledge than did medical students and allied health professionals; all had critical knowledge gaps. Demographic and professional characteristics predicted knowledge levels, with experience of end-of-life law in practice, confidence applying law and recent continuing professional development being positively associated with legal knowledge.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new evidence about legal knowledge across a broad range of health professions. While knowledge levels varied somewhat across professions, knowledge gaps were observed in all professional groups. Education and training initiatives to enhance knowledge of end-of-life law should be tailored to meet the specific needs of each profession. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34083318     DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care        ISSN: 2045-435X            Impact factor:   3.568


  2 in total

1.  Junior medical doctors' decision making when using advance care directives to guide treatment for people with dementia: a cross-sectional vignette study.

Authors:  Amy Waller; Jamie Bryant; Alison Bowman; Ben P White; Lindy Willmott; Robert Pickles; Carolyn Hullick; Emma Price; Anne Knight; Mary-Ann Ryall; Mathew Clapham; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.834

2.  Developing an innovative medical ethics and law curriculum-constructing a situation-based, interdisciplinary, court-based learning course: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Wan-Ting Chen; Chung-Pei Fu; Yan-Di Chang; Yi-Chih Shiao; Po-Yi Chen; Chih-Chia Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.463

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.