Jay D Patel1, Michael Briones2, Mansi Mandhani1, Shannon Jones1, Divya Suthar1, Rosemary Gray1, Joelle Pettus1, Courtney McCracken1, Amanda Thomas1, Christopher J Petit3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Electronic address: cjp2196@cumc.columbia.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anatomic interventions for pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) in infants and children have been met with limited success. Sirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, has demonstrated promise as a primary medical therapy for PVS, but the impact on patient survival is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to investigate whether mTOR inhibition with sirolimus as a primary medical therapy would improve outcomes in high-risk infants and children with PVS. METHODS: In this single-center study, patients with severe PVS were considered for systemic sirolimus therapy (SST) following a strict protocol while receiving standardized surveillance and anatomic therapies. The SST cohort was compared with a contemporary control group. The primary endpoint for this study was survival. The primary safety endpoint was adverse events (AEs) related to SST. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2020, our PVS program diagnosed and treated 67 patients with ≥moderate PVS. Of these, 15 patients were treated with sirolimus, whereas the remaining patients represent the control group. There was 100% survival in the SST group compared with 45% survival in the control group (log-rank p = 0.004). A sensitivity analysis was completed to address survival bias using median time from diagnosis of PVS to SST. A survival advantage persisted (log-rank p = 0.027). Two patients on sirolimus developed treatable AEs. Patients in the SST group underwent frequent transcatheter interventions with 3.7 catheterizations per person-year (25th to 75th percentile: 2.7 to 4.4 person-years). Median follow up time was 2.2 years (25th to 75th percentile: 1.2 to 2.9 years) in the SST group versus 0.9 years (25th to 75th percentile: 0.5 to 2.7 years) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found a survival benefit associated with SST in infants and children with moderate-to-severe PVS. This survival benefit persisted after adjusting the analysis for survival bias. There were 2 mild AEs associated with SST during the study period; both patients were able to resume therapy without recurrence.
BACKGROUND: Anatomic interventions for pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) in infants and children have been met with limited success. Sirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, has demonstrated promise as a primary medical therapy for PVS, but the impact on patient survival is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to investigate whether mTOR inhibition with sirolimus as a primary medical therapy would improve outcomes in high-risk infants and children with PVS. METHODS: In this single-center study, patients with severe PVS were considered for systemic sirolimus therapy (SST) following a strict protocol while receiving standardized surveillance and anatomic therapies. The SST cohort was compared with a contemporary control group. The primary endpoint for this study was survival. The primary safety endpoint was adverse events (AEs) related to SST. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2020, our PVS program diagnosed and treated 67 patients with ≥moderate PVS. Of these, 15 patients were treated with sirolimus, whereas the remaining patients represent the control group. There was 100% survival in the SST group compared with 45% survival in the control group (log-rank p = 0.004). A sensitivity analysis was completed to address survival bias using median time from diagnosis of PVS to SST. A survival advantage persisted (log-rank p = 0.027). Two patients on sirolimus developed treatable AEs. Patients in the SST group underwent frequent transcatheter interventions with 3.7 catheterizations per person-year (25th to 75th percentile: 2.7 to 4.4 person-years). Median follow up time was 2.2 years (25th to 75th percentile: 1.2 to 2.9 years) in the SST group versus 0.9 years (25th to 75th percentile: 0.5 to 2.7 years) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found a survival benefit associated with SST in infants and children with moderate-to-severe PVS. This survival benefit persisted after adjusting the analysis for survival bias. There were 2 mild AEs associated with SST during the study period; both patients were able to resume therapy without recurrence.
Authors: Shilpa Vyas-Read; Nidhy P Varghese; Divya Suthar; Carl Backes; Satyan Lakshminrusimha; Christopher J Petit; Philip T Levy Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2022-05-12