Literature DB >> 34082100

Gemcitabine-loaded microbubble system for ultrasound imaging and therapy.

Lauren J Delaney1, John R Eisenbrey2, David Brown3, Jonathan R Brody4, Masaya Jimbo5, Brian E Oeffinger3, Maria Stanczak2, Flemming Forsberg2, Ji-Bin Liu2, Margaret A Wheatley6.   

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging presents many positive attributes, including safety, real-time imaging, universal accessibility, and cost. However, inherent difficulties in discrimination between soft tissues and tumors prompted development of stabilized microbubble contrast agents. This presents the opportunity to develop agents in which drug is entrapped in the microbubble shell. We describe preparation and characterization of theranostic poly(lactide) (PLA) and pegylated PLA (PEG-PLA) shelled microbubbles that entrap gemcitabine, a commonly used drug for pancreatic cancer (PDAC). Entrapping 6 wt% gemcitabine did not significantly affect drug activity, microbubble morphology, or ultrasound contrast activity compared with unmodified microbubbles. In vitro microbubble concentrations yielding ≥ 500nM entrapped gemcitabine were needed for complete cell death in MIA PaCa-2 PDAC drug sensitivity assays, compared with 62.5 nM free gemcitabine. In vivo administration of gemcitabine-loaded microbubbles to xenograft MIA PaCa-2 PDAC tumors in athymic mice was well tolerated and provided substantial tumoral image enhancement before and after destructive ultrasound pulses. However, no significant differences in tumor growth were observed among treatment groups, in keeping with the in vitro observation that much higher doses of gemcitabine are required to mirror free gemcitabine activity. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The preliminary results shown here are encouraging and support further investigation into increased gemcitabine loading. Encapsulation of gemcitabine within polylactic acid (PLA) microbubbles does not damage its activity towards pancreatic cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, PDAC) cells. Excellent imaging and evidence of penetration into the highly desmoplastic PDAC tumors is demonstrated. Microbubble destruction was confirmed in vivo, showing that elevated mechanical index shatters the microbubbles for enhanced delivery. The potential to slow PDAC growth in vivo is shown, but higher gemcitabine concentrations are required. Current efforts are directed at increasing drug loading by inclusion of drug-carrying nanoparticles for effective in vivo treatment.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gemcitabine; Pancreatic adenocarcinoma; Polymer microbubbles; Targeted drug delivery; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34082100      PMCID: PMC9233940          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.05.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   10.633


  58 in total

1.  Development of a novel method for synthesis of a polymeric ultrasound contrast agent.

Authors:  Dalia M El-Sherif; Margaret A Wheatley
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 4.396

2.  Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  R E Apfel; C K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Ultrasound-mediated destruction of oxygen and paclitaxel loaded dual-targeting microbubbles for intraperitoneal treatment of ovarian cancer xenografts.

Authors:  Tingting Luo; Jiangchuan Sun; Shenyin Zhu; Juan He; Lan Hao; Linlin Xiao; Yi Zhu; Qianqian Wang; Xin Pan; Zhigang Wang; Shufang Chang
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 8.679

4.  Intracellular Cytidine Deaminase Regulates Gemcitabine Metabolism in Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Tormod K Bjånes; Lars Petter Jordheim; Jan Schjøtt; Tina Kamceva; Emeline Cros-Perrial; Anika Langer; Gorka Ruiz de Garibay; Spiros Kotopoulis; Emmet McCormack; Bettina Riedel
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 5.  State-of-the-art materials for ultrasound-triggered drug delivery.

Authors:  Shashank R Sirsi; Mark A Borden
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 6.  The pancreas cancer microenvironment.

Authors:  Christine Feig; Aarthi Gopinathan; Albrecht Neesse; Derek S Chan; Natalie Cook; David A Tuveson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Impact of intensified chemotherapy in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in clinical routine in Europe.

Authors:  Muhammad Ahsan Javed; Georg Beyer; Nha Le; Alessio Vinci; Helen Wong; Daniel Palmer; Robert D Morgan; Angela Lamarca; Richard A Hubner; Juan W Valle; Salma Alam; Sumsur Chowdhury; Yuk Ting Ma; Livia Archibugi; Gabriele Capurso; Patrick Maisonneuve; Albrecht Neesse; Malin Sund; Marvin Schober; Sebastian Krug
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.996

8.  Comparison of Gemcitabine monotherapy with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin combination in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Yakup Ergun; Nuriye Yildirim Ozdemir; Ebru Karci Guner; Ece Esin; Mehmet Ali Sendur; Elif Berna Koksoy; Nebi Serkan Demirci; Tulay Eren; Isa Dede; Ahmet Sezer; Huseyin Engin; Berna Oksuzoglu; Bulent Yalcin; Gungor Utkan; Nurullah Zengin; Yuksel Urun
Journal:  J BUON       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.533

9.  National failure to operate on early stage pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Clifford Y Ko; Andrew K Stewart; David P Winchester; Mark S Talamonti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Hyaluronan impairs vascular function and drug delivery in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Jacobetz; Derek S Chan; Albrecht Neesse; Tashinga E Bapiro; Natalie Cook; Kristopher K Frese; Christine Feig; Tomoaki Nakagawa; Meredith E Caldwell; Heather I Zecchini; Martijn P Lolkema; Ping Jiang; Anne Kultti; Curtis B Thompson; Daniel C Maneval; Duncan I Jodrell; Gregory I Frost; H M Shepard; Jeremy N Skepper; David A Tuveson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Application of Ultrasound Combined with Microbubbles for Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Deepa Sharma; Kai Xuan Leong; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 2.  Nanocarriers for pancreatic cancer imaging, treatments, and immunotherapies.

Authors:  Luman Liu; Prakash G Kshirsagar; Shailendra K Gautam; Mansi Gulati; Emad I Wafa; John C Christiansen; Brianna M White; Surya K Mallapragada; Michael J Wannemuehler; Sushil Kumar; Joyce C Solheim; Surinder K Batra; Aliasger K Salem; Balaji Narasimhan; Maneesh Jain
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 11.600

Review 3.  Making waves: how ultrasound-targeted drug delivery is changing pharmaceutical approaches.

Authors:  Lauren J Delaney; Selin Isguven; John R Eisenbrey; Noreen J Hickok; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Mater Adv       Date:  2022-02-23

4.  Targeted Nanobubbles of PD-L1 mAb Combined with Doxorubicin as a Synergistic Tumor Repressor in Hepatocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yezi Chen; Xiaoqin Luo; Yun Liu; Yunlei Zou; Shiqi Yang; Chaoqi Liu; Yun Zhao
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2022-09-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.