Ring-opening of epoxides furnishing either linear or branched products belongs to the group of classic transformations in organic synthesis. However, the regioselective cross-electrophile coupling of aryl epoxides with aryl halides still represents a key challenge. Herein, we report that the vitamin B12/Ni dual-catalytic system allows for the selective synthesis of linear products under blue-light irradiation, thus complementing methodologies that give access to branched alcohols. Experimental and theoretical studies corroborate the proposed mechanism involving alkylcobalamin as an intermediate in this reaction.
Ring-opening of epoxides furnishing either linear or branched products belongs to the group of classic transforma<span class="Chemical">tions in organic synthesis. However, the regioselective cross-electrophile coupling of aryl epoxides with aryl halides still represents a key challenge. Herein, we report that the vitamin B12/Ni dual-catalytic system allows for the selective synthesis of linear products under blue-light irradiation, thus complementing methodologies that give access to branched alcohols. Experimental and theoretical studies corroborate the proposed mechanism involving alkylcobalamin as an intermediate in this reaction.
Driven by high demand
for sustainable and efficient reactions,
the dis<span class="Chemical">covery of selective reactivity patterns remains a key challenge.
As epoxides are crucial building blocks in the synthesis of nonsymmetrical
alcohols, their regioselective reactions have been intensively studied.[1−3] In particular, considerable attention has been recently devoted
to the utilization of epoxides in cross-electrophile couplings leading,
in general, to regioisomeric (linear and branched) products (Scheme ).[4−7] It has been shown that the innately
electrophilic epoxides can be transformed into radicals and, as such,
be involved in a transition-metal-catalytic cycle.[7,8] Depending
on reaction conditions, the initial nucleophilic attack occurs predominantly
at either the terminal or internal carbon atom.
Scheme 1
Regioselective Nickel-Catalyzed
Cross-Electrophile Coupling of Epoxides
with Aryl Halides
In 2014, Weix and
co-workers developed a <span class="Chemical">nickel-catalyzed, regiodivergent
cross-electrophile coupling of epoxides with various halides and triflates.[6] For aliphatic epoxides (Scheme , upper part), the regioselectivity of the
ring-opening step depends on the cocatalyst used. Sodium iodide promotes
the formation of a linear product. The nucleophilic attack of the
iodide anion at the less substituted carbon atom affords iodohydrin,
which in turn undergoes reduction and Ni-catalyzed coupling with an
electrophile. On the other hand, in the presence of a titanocene cocatalyst
secondary alkyl radicals are generated, facilitating the formation
of branched products.[9,10]Aryl epoxides, however,
react predominantly at the benzylic position, regardless of the conditions
employed. A similar reactivity pattern has been recently
reported by the Doyle group, who used organic iodides and the Ti/Ni/photoredox
catalytic system in ring-opening reactions of three major classes
of epoxides, namely, aryl, aliphatic, and bicyclic (Scheme , lower part).[11] By changing a nickelcomplex, the authors were able to
transform aliphatic epoxides into linear products, while aryl epoxides
selectively formed branched ones. Despite the enormous importance
of these contributions, the synthesis of linear products from
aryl epoxides via cross-electrophile coupling still represents an
unsolved challenge.
Our recent work on the alkyla<span class="Chemical">tion
of strained molecules showed
that cobalt catalysis opens the path to a polarity-reversal strategy
for radical couplings.[12] We questioned
whether it would be possible to adapt this methodology to achieve
selective reactions of epoxides. Herein, we disclose that the nucleophilicity
of Co(I) species along with sterically restricted side chains allows
generating C-radicals from epoxides in a selective manner and engage
them in Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling.
Results and Discussion
Design
of the Catalytic System
Vitamin B12 (1, <span class="Chemical">cobalamin) is a natural cobaltcomplex of remarkable
stability and high biological importance.[13−15] Due to the
unique ability to form light-sensitive cobalt–carbon bonds,
vitamin B12 (1) and its hydrophobic and amphiphilic
derivatives 2 and 3 (Scheme A)[16−21] have also been adopted for synthetic chemistry and used as redox
mediators for the generation of various radicals.[22,23] We assumed that a nucleophilic Co(I)complex that forms upon the
reduction of cobalamin should open electrophilic epoxides, generating
alkyl cobalamins (Scheme B). Such intermediates, upon light irradiation, undergo the
homolytic Co–C bond cleavage to give alkyl radicals, which
can be engaged in a number of both radical reactions and transition-metal-catalyzed
cross-couplings. Importantly, from the viewpoint of regioselective
design, a bulky vitamin Bcatalyst should attack an epoxide from the less sterically hindered
side. This kinetic factor may prevail over the high thermodynamic
preference for stabilized benzyl radicals and thus allow the selective
formation of primary radicals of type III.
Scheme 2
(A) Structures
of Cocatalysts: Vitamin B12 and Derivatives;
(B) Proposed Mechanistic Concept
To examine our hypothesis, in the first instance, we theore<span class="Chemical">tically
investigated the possible formation of alkyl radicals via a sequence
of the epoxide ring opening with reduced vitamin B12 (Co(I)complex) followed by homolytic cleavage of the Co–C bond in
alkylcobalamin II. DFT calculations were performed with
Gaussian 16.[24] Geometry optimizations were
computed at the BP86/6-31G(d) level of theory with the D3 version
of Grimme’s empirical dispersion correction and solvation (acetone)
with the SMD model. Frequency analysis was performed at the same level
to provide correction to thermodynamic functions and confirm the nature
of optimized structures (minima and transition states featured zero
or one imaginary frequency, respectively). Single-point energies were
computed at the BP86/6-311++G(2df,p) level of theory with the D3 version
of Grimme’s empirical dispersion correction and solvation (acetone)
with the SMD model. Several hybrid and long-range corrected functionals
were tested for the model reaction (see Supporting Information (SI) for details). BP86 was, however, selected
for further studies due to good performance reported for both ground
and exited state calculations of cobalamin systems.[25−30] We performed calculations approximating the structure of vitamin
B12 (1) with a Co-corrincomplex bearing 15
methyl groups, reflecting the substitution pattern at the periphery
of the macrocyclic ring (Figure ).
Figure 1
Calculated Gibbs free energy profile for the reaction
of styrene
oxide with the Co(I)-corrin complex.
Calculated Gibbs free energy profile for the reaction
of <span class="Chemical">styrene
oxide with the Co(I)-corrincomplex.
The calculated Gibbs free energy profile for the benchmark reaction
of <span class="Chemical">styrene oxide (5a) with the Co-corrincomplex is depicted
in Figure . Two paths,
involving the nucleophilic attack on either side of the epoxide, were
considered. In line with our assumptions, the ring opening of the
epoxide with the nucleophilic Co(I)complex should proceed at the
less hindered terminus with a 43.7 kJ/mol barrier, accessible even
under mild conditions (black path). The barrier for the analogous
reaction at the more hindered side is ∼8 kJ/mol higher (gray
path). Sterically driven differences in the reactivity might be even
more pronounced for native vitamin B12 or its derivatives
compared to the selected model, due to presence of more sizable substituents
at the corrin ring. Then, the resulting Co(III)complex (I) is protonated, providing intermediate II. As expected
for alkyl cobalamins, the Co–C(sp3) bond in IIa and IIb is relatively weak and quite vulnerable
to homolytic cleavage toward alkyl radical IIIa or IIIb and a Co(II)complex (ΔG = 141.9
and 82.6 kJ/mol, respectively). In particular, IIa could
undergo Co–C photodissociation, presumably through the mechanism
proposed by Kozlowski, involving generation of the singlet radical
pair from the first electronically excited state (S1).[31−33]
The lowest singlet (IIa-S1) vertically excited
states
of intermediate IIa were found at 2.20 eV (212.5 kJ/mol,
TD BP86-D3/6-311++G(2df,p)), while the relaxed S1 state lies 28.2
kJ/mol lower and features elonga<span class="Chemical">tion of the Co–C bond by 0.22
Å. Noticeably, due to the preference for the nucleophilic attack
at the less hindered side of the epoxide, the above-described path
(black) should provide access to a 2-hydroxy-2-phenyl ethyl radical
(IIIa), even though isomeric benzyl radical IIIb is thermodynamically more stable by 47.2 kJ/mol.
To support
theoretical studies, the reduc<span class="Chemical">tive photochemical ring
opening of styrene oxide (5a) in the presence of a hydrophobic
vitamin B12 derivative, HME (3), was performed
(Scheme ). The selected
Cocomplex 3 allows convenient monitoring of reactive
intermediates by ESI mass spectrometry due to its tendency to undergo
facile ionization.
Scheme 3
Vitamin B12-Catalyzed Ring Opening of Epoxide 5
Indeed, the formation of intermediate
<span class="Chemical">alkyl-cobalt(III) complex II was observed by HR-MS (m/z = 1157.5149 [M + H]+, see
the SI, Section 6.2), which is in good agreement with previous reports
by Scheffold[34−38] and Rusling,[39] who used vitamin B12 (1) for isomerization of symmetrical epoxides
to allyl alcohols. Satisfyingly, alcohol 9a with a −OH
group at the benzylic position formed just after 30 min. These results
corroborate the proposed mechanistic concept in which vitamin B12 opens the aromatic epoxide from the less hindered side at
the thermodynamic expense of forming the less stable radical III in the subsequent light-induced cleavage step.
Knowing
that B12 catalysis can be merged with <span class="Chemical">metal-catalyzed
reactions,[12] we next evaluated the feasibility
of incorporating the generated alkyl radicals in the Ni catalytic
cycle. Adding electrophilic aryl halides should enable cross-electrophile
coupling and thus provide a convenient method for the carbon–carbon
bond formation.[40] The plausible mechanism
for the reaction of epoxides with aryl halides in the presence of
the B12/Ni catalytic system based on literature reports
is outlined in Scheme B.[7,41−43] The coupling requires
the cooperation of both transition metalcomplexes (Co and Ni) that
are activated by Zn/NH4Cl.[44,45] The oxidative
addition of aryl halide to Ni(0) produces arylnickel(II) species IV, which undergoes subsequent alkylation with radical III and generates intermediate V. Alternatively,
the same Ni(III) species can originate from the interception of alkyl
radical III by Ni(0), preceding the oxidative addition,
as has been recently proposed by Molander and Kozlowski.[46] Both these possible pathways are followed by
irreversible reductive elimination, leading to the regioselective
formation of a linear product. Cobalt(II) and nickel(I)complexes
are regenerated to Co(I) and Ni(0) with Zn, thereby closing the cycles.
Styrene oxide (5a), when subjected to the reac<span class="Chemical">tion
with p-iodotoluene (6a) in the presence of HME (3) and NiCl2(DME), generated desired linear product 7aa as
a single regioisomer in 16% yield (Scheme ). The replacement of HME (3) with native vitamin B12 increased the yield up to 41%.
Noteworthy, the reaction without any cobaltcomplex added not only
was lower-yielding but also led to a mixture of two regioisomers with
a predominance of the branched product. This result clearly
shows the decisive influence of the cobaltcocatalysis on the selectivity
of this transformation. Control experiments confirmed the
dual-catalytic and light-induced nature of the process, while the
addition of a radical trap (TEMPO) supported its radical character
(see SI).
Scheme 4
Proof-of-Concept
Experiments
Conditions:
epoxide (5a, 0.2 mmol), aryl halide (6a,
1.5 equiv), NiCl2(DME) (20 mol %), Zn (3 equiv), NH4Cl (3 equiv), dtbbpy
(40 mol %), dry NMP (c = 0.1 M), blue LED (single
diode, 10 W), 30 min.
Proof-of-Concept
Experiments
Condi<span class="Chemical">tions:
epoxide (5a, 0.2 mmol), aryl halide (6a,
1.5 equiv), NiCl2(DME) (20 mol %), Zn (3 equiv), NH4Cl (3 equiv), dtbbpy
(40 mol %), dry NMP (c = 0.1 M), blue LED (single
diode, 10 W), 30 min.
Noteworthy, the reaction
without any <span class="Chemical">cobaltcomplex added not only
was lower-yielding but also led to a mixture of two regioisomers with
a predominance of the branched product. This result clearly
shows the decisive influence of the cobaltcocatalysis on the selectivity
of this transformation. Control experiments confirmed the
dual-catalytic and light-induced nature of the process, while the
addition of a radical trap (TEMPO) supported its radical character
(see SI).
Optimization
Next,
we turned our attention toward the
synthe<span class="Chemical">tic utility of the developed method. The reaction was optimized
with respect to cobalt and nickel catalysts, solvent, ligand, and
reducing system, providing the desired product 7aa in
60% yield (Table ,
entry 1).
Table 1
Optimization Studies of the Cross-Electrophile
Ring Opening of Epoxidesa
entry
deviation
from the standard conditions
yield (%) 7aaa
1
none
60
2
HME instead of B12
57
3
Co(acac)3 instead
of B12
5
4
CoCl2 instead
of B12
7
5
Co(dmgH)2Cl(py)
instead of B12
8
6
Co(dmgH)2iPr(py) instead of B12
11
7b
Mn instead of Zn
30
8
NiCl2 instead
of NiCl2(DME)
36
9
Ni(acac)2 instead
of NiCl2(DME)
33
10
Ni(OTf)2 instead
of NiCl2(DME)
39
11
1,10-phenanthroline instead
of dtbbpy
24
12
terpyridine instead of dtbbpy
13
13
no water added
53
Conditions: epoxide
(5, 0.2 mmol), aryl halide (7, 1.5 equiv),
B12 (5 mol %), NiCl2(DME) (20 mol %), Zn (1.5
equiv), NH4Cl (3 equiv), dtbbpy (40 mol %), H2O (1.1 equiv),
dry NMP (c = 0.1 M), time 30 min, blue LED (single
diode, 10 W) (for more details see SI).
Condi<span class="Chemical">tions: epoxide
(5, 0.2 mmol), aryl halide (7, 1.5 equiv),
B12 (5 mol %), NiCl2(DME) (20 mol %), Zn (1.5
equiv), NH4Cl (3 equiv), dtbbpy (40 mol %), H2O (1.1 equiv),
dry NMP (c = 0.1 M), time 30 min, blue LED (single
diode, 10 W) (for more details see SI).
Mn (1.5 equiv), TMSCl (0.2
equiv),
<span class="Chemical">dmgH = dimethylglyoxime, dtbbpy = 4,4′-di-tert-butylbipyridine.
We found
that the addition of <span class="Chemical">water (1.1 equiv) improved the yield
of the reaction, while kinetic studies allowed us to determine the
optimal reaction time (30 min, for details, see SI). The use of hydrophobic HME (3) instead of
the parent vitamin B12 had little impact on the optimized
model reaction (entry 2), while other commonly utilized cobaltcomplexes
(Co(acac)3, CoCl2) led to a decrease in the
yield of alcohol7aa (entries 3, 4). We have also examined
cobalt dimethylglyooximate (dmg) complexes, which have been used by
Pattenden[47] and Morandi[48] in regioselective cobalt-catalyzed coupling of aliphatic
epoxides with alkenes. In our system, however, both catalysts afforded
the desired product 7aa only in low yields (entries 5,
6). Evaluation of reducing agents ruled out manganese or tetrakis(dimethylamino)ethylene
(TDAE) as an efficient alternative to the Zn/NH4Cl system
(entry 7). It also allowed establishing the optimal ratio of the two
components at the 1.5 equiv: 3 equiv level. The reaction outcome did
not improve in the presence of NiCl2, Ni(acac)2, or Ni(OTf)2 as well as other ligands (entries 8–12).
Finally, various solvents were tested (for more details, see SI), but NMP with the addition of water (1.1
equiv) assured the highest yield (entry 13).
Detailed analysis
of the reaction mixture revealed the forma<span class="Chemical">tion
of byproducts aside from desired product 7aa under the
optimized conditions (Scheme B). Acetophenone (8a, a side-product originating
from epoxide 5a) formed in 5% yield presumably via β-hydride
elimination, while styrene (10a) is obtained in 30% yield
from intermediate alcohol 9.[49] Finally, the reductive elimination in the nickel cycle may account
for the observed small amount of biphenyl 11.[50−52] In order to gain more insight into the reaction mechanism, we carried
out the reaction with enantioenriched styrene oxide (5a) under the optimized conditions. The expected coupling product 7aa was obtained without any erosion of the stereocenter,
which further supports the premise of the formation of the radical
at the terminal position.
Substrate Scope
With the optimized
<span class="Chemical">conditions in hand,
we explored the scope and limitations of the developed method (Scheme ).
Scheme 5
Vitamin B12-Catalyzed Ring-Opening Cross-Electrophile
Coupling of (a) Aryl Epoxides and (b) Alkyl
Epoxides,
Conditions:
epoxide (0.2 mmol),
aryl halide (1.5 equiv), B12 (5 mol %), NiCl2(DME) (20 mol %), Zn (1.5 equiv), NH4Cl (3 equiv), dtbbpy
(40 mol %), H2O (1.1 equiv), dry NMP (c = 0.1 M), blue LED (single diode, 10 W), 30 min (for more details
see SI).
Blue LED (single diode, 3 W), 16 h.
HME (5 mol %), acetone (c = 0.1
M), blue LED (single diode, 3 W), 16 h.
Determined by GC.
Vitamin B12-Catalyzed Ring-Opening Cross-Electrophile
Coupling of (a) Aryl Epoxides and (b) Alkyl
Epoxides,
Condi<span class="Chemical">tions:
epoxide (0.2 mmol),
aryl halide (1.5 equiv), B12 (5 mol %), NiCl2(DME) (20 mol %), Zn (1.5 equiv), NH4Cl (3 equiv), dtbbpy
(40 mol %), H2O (1.1 equiv), dry NMP (c = 0.1 M), blue LED (single diode, 10 W), 30 min (for more details
see SI).
Blue LED (single diode, 3 W), 16 h.HME (5 mol %), <span class="Chemical">acetone (c = 0.1
M), blue LED (single diode, 3 W), 16 h.
Determined by GC.Monosubstituted
<span class="Chemical">aryl epoxides5a-f, bearing both electron-withdrawing
and electron-donating substituents, are, in general, well-tolerated
and give corresponding products 7aa–fa in 50–58% yields. However, 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)oxirane (5e) does not afford the desired product, as it decomposes
rapidly under the present conditions. For disubstituted epoxides,
the substitution pattern determines their reactivity. 1,1-Disubsituted
epoxide 5f leads to product 7fa in 44% yield,
while 1,2-disubstituted epoxide 5g remains unreactive.
As far as aryl halides are concerned, under standard conditions, both
electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents are well tolerated,
giving desired products 7ab–ao in
good to moderate yield (28–63%). Substitution at the 3- or
4-position of an aryl halide does not affect the reaction. In contrast,
the more hindered halide, 2-iodotoluene (6c), undergoes
coupling with styrene oxide (5a) in reduced reaction
yield (compare 7aa, 7ab, and 7ac). Although vitamin B12 exhibits exquisite reactivity
in dehalogenation reactions,[11] which often
precludes the use of halogenated substrates, in our conditions product 7ad forms in 44% yield. Importantly from the standpoint of
possible further functionalizations, other functional groups (hydroxyl,
carbonyl, protected amine) remain unaffected. Moreover, the representative
heteroaryl halide, 5-iodo-(4-methylphenylsulfonyl)indole (6l), proves to be a viable substrate in the studied reaction without
any further optimization needed. The developed method is also suitable
for epoxides with aliphatic substituents (Scheme ). The chain length does not impact the transformation’s
outcome; the reaction with 1,2-epoxyhexane (5h) and 1,2-epoxydodecane
(5i) gives products in 74% and 77% yield, respectively.
We also found that aliphatic epoxide 5j, possessing a
protected primary hydroxyl group, could be converted into secondary
alcohol 7ja in 60% yield. The reaction with 4-(phenylsulfonyl)-1,2-epoxybutane
(5k) gives corresponding product 7ka in
73% yield. The potential use of aziridines as substrates was also
investigated under the developed conditions, but only low yields of
the respective products were obtained (see SI). Further studies on extending our methodology to other classes
of heterocycles are currently ongoing in our laboratory.
Subsequently,
the scope of <span class="Chemical">aryl halides for the reaction with 1,2-epoxyhexane
(5h) was explored. Substrates with both types of substituents—electron-rich
and electron-deficient—on the aromatic ring afford the corresponding
products 7hd–ol in satisfactory yields.
The N-Boc-protected amine, alkoxy, and carbonyl functionalities
are well tolerated. The reaction with 1-chloro-4-iodobenzene (6d) leads to anticipated alcohol 7hd in 51% yield.
Similar to the reaction with aryl epoxides, indole-derived halide 6l proved also a competent substrate, affording 1-(1-tosyl-1H-indol-5-yl)hexan-2-ol (7hl).
Compared
to monosubs<span class="Chemical">tituted substrates, bicyclic epoxide 5o was
converted to the desired coupling product 7oa with a
significantly lower yield.[5] Therefore,
to gain a better understanding of how the reaction conditions affect
the cross-electrophile coupling of disubstituted epoxides with arylhalides, additional experimental and theoretical studies were performed.
The use of hydrophobic analogue 3 instead of vitamin
B12 (1) does not bring any substan<span class="Chemical">tial improvement
(Table , entries 1,
2). However, with the simultaneous replacement of NMP with acetone,
a 2-fold increase in the yield of 7oa was observed (entry
3). A similar trend was also present for bicyclic epoxide 5n and 1-oxaspiro[2.5]octane (5m), which provide considerably
higher yields of desired alcohols 7na and 7oa in the presence of the HME/acetone system compared to vitamin B12/NMP. The main feature by which the studied Co catalysts
differ is the presence/absence of the so-called “nucleotide
loop” (the axial ligand located at the α face of the
corrin ring with a 5′,6′-dimethylbenzimidazol (DMB)
moiety) in addition to the replacement of amide into ester groups.
Halpern et al. reported that in methyl malonyl-coenzyme A rearrangement
switching between base-on and base-off forms of (CN)Cbl (1) changes the strength of the Co–C bond and hence the rate
of its homolytic cleavage.[53] To assess
if the presence of this structural element impacts opening of bicyclic
epoxides, we used cobalester 2 as a Cocomplex. This
catalyst bears a nucleotide loop in its structure, but unlike parent
vitamin B12, it dissolves well in both NMP and acetone,
allowing for a direct comparison. A decisive solvent’s dependence
was observed, with acetone assuring a higher yield than NMP (entries
4, 5), which corroborates the sole influence of the reaction medium.
Likewise, the reaction catalyzed by cobinamide 4 (amide
groups, no nucleotide loop) in NMP gives similar results to reactions
catalyzed by other B12 derivatives in this solvent (entry
6).
Table 2
Influence of the Co Complex Structure
on the Opening of Bicyclic Epoxidesa
entry
solvent
catalyst
yield (%) 7oa
1
NMP
B12
31
CONH2
loop
2
NMP
HME
26
CO2Me
no loop
3
acetone
HME[12]
56
CO2Me
no loop
4
acetone
cobalester[17]
55
CO2Me
loop
5
NMP
cobalester
32
CO2Me
loop
6
NMP
cobinamide[54]
35
CONH2
no loop
Conditions: epoxide
(5o, 0.2 mmol), aryl halide (6a, 1.5 equiv),
Co catalyst
(5 mol %), NiCl2(DME) (20 mol %), Zn (1.5 equiv), NH4Cl (3.0 equiv), dtbbpy (40 mol %), solvent (c = 0.1 M), blue LED (single diode, 3 W), 16 h.
Condi<span class="Chemical">tions: epoxide
(5o, 0.2 mmol), aryl halide (6a, 1.5 equiv),
Co catalyst
(5 mol %), NiCl2(DME) (20 mol %), Zn (1.5 equiv), NH4Cl (3.0 equiv), dtbbpy (40 mol %), solvent (c = 0.1 M), blue LED (single diode, 3 W), 16 h.
Performed kinetic studies <span class="Chemical">contributed
to a better understanding
of the observed differences. The rate of the bicyclic epoxide (5o) ring opening was found to vary significantly depending
on the conditions applied (Chart ). It takes 6 h to fully convert epoxide 5o in both vitamin B12- and HME-catalyzed reactions as long
as NMP is used as a solvent (compare fields A and C). On the other
hand, the reaction in acetone provides full conversion in less than
3 h, which, presumably, translates to greater availability of alkylradicals at a particular time (compare fields C and D).
Chart 1
Kinetic
Profile of the Opening of Bicyclic Epoxides (6o) (A,
C, D) and Aliphatic Epoxide 6h (B)a,b
Condi<span class="Chemical">tions: epoxide (5,
0.2 mmol), aryl halide (6a, 1.5 equiv), Co catalyst
(5 mol %), NiCl2(DME) (20 mol %), Zn (1.5 equiv), NH4Cl (3.0 equiv), dtbbpy (40 mol %), solvent (c = 0.1 M), blue LED (single diode, 3 W), 16 h, dodecane as an internal
standard.
Measurements at t = 0 min refer to concentra<span class="Chemical">tions of compounds before mixing
two solutions; see SI.
The reactivity of <span class="Chemical">aryl iodide toward a Ni catalyst is assumed to
be at a similar level, regardless of the conditions applied. Therefore,
in NMP an insufficient concentration of alkyl radicals derived from
bicyclic epoxides may promote Ni-catalyzed homocoupling of aryl iodide 6a, an unproductive pathway, leading to biphenyl (11a) (fields A and C).[50,52] This side-product is observed
only in the presence of the Ni complex. The higher reactivity of monosubstituted
aliphatic epoxide 5h is reflected by its faster conversion
as compared to bicyclic epoxide 5o (compare fields A
and B). In their case, the catalyst and the solvent do not affect
the reaction; yields are almost identical (74%) in both cases.
The observed reactivity pattern <span class="Chemical">corresponds well with the calculated
barriers for the nucleophilic opening of the epoxides with the Co(I)-corrincomplex (Figure ).
In general, the Gibbs free energy of activation for the reaction of
aryl- and alkyl-monosubstituted epoxides (TS1a and TS2a, 43.7 and 47.1 kJ/mol for Ph- and Me-substituted, respectively)
is smaller than for more sterically demanding 1,2-disubstituted epoxides
(TS3 and TS4, >70 kJ/mol). Nevertheless,
bicyclic substrates 5n,o provide desired
products 7na and 7oa in good yields, while
epoxide 5g, for which the activation barrier is ∼3
kJ/mol higher, remains unreactive (TS3 versus TS4a) regardless of the Z/E configuration
of the epoxide (TS4a vs TS4b, ΔG⧧ = 74.4 vs 78.9 kJ/mol). Additionally,
the observed regioselectivity is well reflected by the energetically
favored attack of the Co(I)-corrin on the less hindered side on propylene
oxide (a model used for an alkyl epoxide, TS2a vs TS2b, ΔG⧧ = 47.1
vs 67.4 kJ/mol).
Figure 2
Gibbs free energy barriers for the opening of epoxides
with the
Co(I)-corrin complex calculated at the BP86-D3/6-311++G(2df,p)/SMD(acetone)//BP86-D3/6-31G(d)/SMD(acetone)
level of theory.
Gibbs free energy barriers for the opening of epoxides
with the
<span class="Chemical">Co(I)-corrincomplex calculated at the BP86-D3/6-311++G(2df,p)/SMD(acetone)//BP86-D3/6-31G(d)/SMD(acetone)
level of theory.
Conclusions
We
have developed a highly regioselective, <span class="Chemical">Co/Ni-catalyzed ring-opening
reaction of epoxides with aryl halides. The scope of our method has
been demonstrated in a broad range of aliphatic and aromatic epoxides.
Gratifyingly, these include cyclic and disubstituted epoxides even
though the Gibbs free energy of activation for their reactions are
higher than for alkyl- and aryl-monosubstituted substrates. Due to
the mild reaction conditions, a wide range of functional groups is
well tolerated.
Only the coopera<span class="Chemical">tion of vitamin B12 as a Co catalyst
with Ni catalysis assures high regioselectivity of the cross-electrophile
coupling. The crucial ring opening by the Co(I)complex occurs from
the less hindered side, leading to linear products.
This new
methodology complements the exis<span class="Chemical">ting approaches providing
access to a diverse array of substituted alcohols, which are valuable
feedstock chemicals in synthetic and medicinal chemistry. Consequently,
it closes the gap in the synthesis of linear and branched alcohols
via cross-electrophile coupling; they are now accessible from both
alkyl and aryl epoxides.
Authors: Andreas Gansäuer; Andriy Barchuk; Florian Keller; Martin Schmitt; Stefan Grimme; Mareike Gerenkamp; Christian Mück-Lichtenfeld; Kim Daasbjerg; Heidi Svith Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2007-02-07 Impact factor: 15.419