Literature DB >> 34081267

Meta-control: From psychology to computational neuroscience.

Ben Eppinger1,2,3, Thomas Goschke4,5, Sebastian Musslick6.   

Abstract

Research in the past decades shed light on the different mechanisms that underlie our capacity for cognitive control. However, the meta-level processes that regulate cognitive control itself remain poorly understood. Following the terminology from artificial intelligence, meta-control can be defined as a collection of mechanisms that (a) monitor the progress of controlled processing and (b) regulate the underlying control parameters in the service of current task goals and in response to internal or external constraints. From a psychological perspective, meta-control is an important concept because it may help explain and predict how and when human agents select different types of behavioral strategies. From a cognitive neuroscience viewpoint, meta-control is a useful concept for understanding the complex networks in the prefrontal cortex that guide higher-level behavior as well as their interactions with neuromodulatory systems (such as the dopamine or norepinephrine system). The purpose of the special issue is to integrate hitherto segregated strands of research across three different perspectives: 1) a psychological perspective that specifies meta-control processes on a functional level and aims to operationalize them in experimental tasks; 2) a computational perspective that builds on ideas from artificial intelligence to formalize normative solutions to meta-control problems; and 3) a cognitive neuroscience perspective that identifies neural correlates of and mechanisms underlying meta-control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive control; Cognitive neuroscience; Computational modeling; Meta-control; Psychology

Year:  2021        PMID: 34081267     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-021-00919-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  4 in total

Review 1.  Freezing revisited: coordinated autonomic and central optimization of threat coping.

Authors:  Karin Roelofs; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 38.755

Review 2.  Attention-Setting and Human Mental Function.

Authors:  Thomas Sanocki; Jong Han Lee
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  Meta-control of social learning strategies.

Authors:  Anil Yaman; Nicolas Bredeche; Onur Çaylak; Joel Z Leibo; Sang Wan Lee
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Need for cognition does not account for individual differences in metacontrol of decision making.

Authors:  Florian Bolenz; Maxine F Profitt; Fabian Stechbarth; Ben Eppinger; Alexander Strobel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.