Mahmut Enes Kayaalp1,2, Yigit Umur Cirdi3, Sebastian Kopf2, Roland Becker4. 1. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Taksim Training and Research Hospital, 34433, Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School "Theodor Fontane", Hochstraße 26, 14776, Brandenburg, Germany. 3. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Erciyes University School of Medicine, 38039, Kayseri, Turkey. 4. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School "Theodor Fontane", Hochstraße 26, 14776, Brandenburg, Germany. roland_becker@yahoo.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Treatment of isolated retropatellar cartilage defects using current gel-type regenerative methods requires settlement of the gel to the underlying subchondral bone under gravity; thus, prone positioned arthroscopy is used. INDICATIONS: Isolated retropatellar contained cartilage defect size >2.5 cm2. Age <40 years, epiphyseal closure, cartilage defect grade 3/4 (International Cartilage Repair Society). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Cartilage defects at medial or lateral femorotibial compartments, at the trochlea, with degenerative genesis, rheumatoid arthritis, local infection, patellar malalignment, patellofemoral dysplasia, knee instability, knee malalignment >3°, kissing lesions. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Two-stage procedure: At initial arthroscopy, chondrocytes were harvested. At the second stage, the patient was positioned prone and the leg with a thigh tourniquet was fixed in a leg holder. Removal of table extension below the knee and support of foot in sling to prevent knee hyperextension. Placement of 2 lateral portals. Lesion visualized and debrided, followed by aspiration of intra-articular fluid. A loop, placed posterior to the patellar ligament using a lasso, was used to suspend a weight to expand the patellofemoral space. The lesion was then dried using a sponge. NOVOCART® Inject (TETEC, Reutlingen, Germany) administered onto the defect. Gel was allowed to solidify for 15 min and operation was completed. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Knee locked in extension using a brace for 6 weeks. Continuous passive motion applied and incrementally increased until full range of motion (ROM) at week 6. Weight-bearing as tolerated was allowed with the knee in extension. Routine clinical follow-up after 3, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Mean age of the 5 patients was 23 ± 6 (range 14-30) years; mean follow-up time after surgery 28 ± 7 (range 20-40) months. All patients returned to full activity without residual knee ROM restriction. Clinical examination at the latest follow-up revealed a Kujala score of 90 ± 12 points and Lysholm score of 95 ± 5 points. MRI showed filled cartilage defects in all patients. Mocart score was 63 ± 7 points. Cartilage was inhomogeneous and hyperintense at the repaired site. Quantitative measurement of the patella mobility of the operated knee under a translating force of 10 N showed medial and lateral displacements of 21 ± 5 and 15 ± 2 mm and on the healthy side 22 ± 5 and 19 ± 3 mm, respectively.
OBJECTIVE: Treatment of isolated retropatellar cartilage defects using current gel-type regenerative methods requires settlement of the gel to the underlying subchondral bone under gravity; thus, prone positioned arthroscopy is used. INDICATIONS: Isolated retropatellar contained cartilage defect size >2.5 cm2. Age <40 years, epiphyseal closure, cartilage defect grade 3/4 (International Cartilage Repair Society). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Cartilage defects at medial or lateral femorotibial compartments, at the trochlea, with degenerative genesis, rheumatoid arthritis, local infection, patellar malalignment, patellofemoral dysplasia, knee instability, knee malalignment >3°, kissing lesions. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Two-stage procedure: At initial arthroscopy, chondrocytes were harvested. At the second stage, the patient was positioned prone and the leg with a thigh tourniquet was fixed in a leg holder. Removal of table extension below the knee and support of foot in sling to prevent knee hyperextension. Placement of 2 lateral portals. Lesion visualized and debrided, followed by aspiration of intra-articular fluid. A loop, placed posterior to the patellar ligament using a lasso, was used to suspend a weight to expand the patellofemoral space. The lesion was then dried using a sponge. NOVOCART® Inject (TETEC, Reutlingen, Germany) administered onto the defect. Gel was allowed to solidify for 15 min and operation was completed. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Knee locked in extension using a brace for 6 weeks. Continuous passive motion applied and incrementally increased until full range of motion (ROM) at week 6. Weight-bearing as tolerated was allowed with the knee in extension. Routine clinical follow-up after 3, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Mean age of the 5 patients was 23 ± 6 (range 14-30) years; mean follow-up time after surgery 28 ± 7 (range 20-40) months. All patients returned to full activity without residual knee ROM restriction. Clinical examination at the latest follow-up revealed a Kujala score of 90 ± 12 points and Lysholm score of 95 ± 5 points. MRI showed filled cartilage defects in all patients. Mocart score was 63 ± 7 points. Cartilage was inhomogeneous and hyperintense at the repaired site. Quantitative measurement of the patella mobility of the operated knee under a translating force of 10 N showed medial and lateral displacements of 21 ± 5 and 15 ± 2 mm and on the healthy side 22 ± 5 and 19 ± 3 mm, respectively.
Authors: Ioannis G Goudakos; Christian König; Philip B Schöttle; William R Taylor; Navrag B Singh; Ian Roberts; Florian Streitparth; Georg N Duda; Markus O Heller Journal: J Biomech Date: 2009-08-04 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: D Dammerer; M C Liebensteiner; U M Kujala; K Emmanuel; S Kopf; F Dirisamer; J M Giesinger Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Markus M Schreiner; Marcus Raudner; Stefan Marlovits; Klaus Bohndorf; Michael Weber; Martin Zalaudek; Sebastian Röhrich; Pavol Szomolanyi; Giuseppe Filardo; Reinhard Windhager; Siegfried Trattnig Journal: Cartilage Date: 2019-08-17 Impact factor: 4.634