Literature DB >> 34081102

A predictive paradigm for COVID-19 prognosis based on the longitudinal measure of biomarkers.

Xin Chen1, Wei Gao2, Jie Li3,4,5, Dongfang You1, Zhaolei Yu1, Mingzhi Zhang1, Fang Shao1, Yongyue Wei1,6,7, Ruyang Zhang1,6,7, Theis Lange8, Qianghu Wang3,4,5, Feng Chen1,5,6,7, Xiang Lu2, Yang Zhao1,5,6,7.   

Abstract

Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging, rapidly evolving crisis, and the ability to predict prognosis for individual COVID-19 patient is important for guiding treatment. Laboratory examinations were repeatedly measured during hospitalization for COVID-19 patients, which provide the possibility for the individualized early prediction of prognosis. However, previous studies mainly focused on risk prediction based on laboratory measurements at one time point, ignoring disease progression and changes of biomarkers over time. By using historical regression trees (HTREEs), a novel machine learning method, and joint modeling technique, we modeled the longitudinal trajectories of laboratory biomarkers and made dynamically predictions on individual prognosis for 1997 COVID-19 patients. In the discovery phase, based on 358 COVID-19 patients admitted between 10 January and 18 February 2020 from Tongji Hospital, HTREE model identified a set of important variables including 14 prognostic biomarkers. With the trajectories of those biomarkers through 5-day, 10-day and 15-day, the joint model had a good performance in discriminating the survived and deceased COVID-19 patients (mean AUCs of 88.81, 84.81 and 85.62% for the discovery set). The predictive model was successfully validated in two independent datasets (mean AUCs of 87.61, 87.55 and 87.03% for validation the first dataset including 112 patients, 94.97, 95.78 and 94.63% for the second validation dataset including 1527 patients, respectively). In conclusion, our study identified important biomarkers associated with the prognosis of COVID-19 patients, characterized the time-to-event process and obtained dynamic predictions at the individual level.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; dynamic risk prediction; longitudinal data; time-to-event

Year:  2021        PMID: 34081102     DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbab206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  3 in total

1.  Dynamics of circulating calprotectin accurately predict the outcome of moderate COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Nicolas Chapuis; Nusaibah Ibrahimi; Thibaut Belmondo; Claire Goulvestre; Anne-Emmanuelle Berger; Alice-Andrée Mariaggi; Muriel Andrieu; Camille Chenevier-Gobeaux; Arnaud Bayle; Lydia Campos; Cherifa Cheurfa; Richard Chocron; Jean-Luc Diehl; Benoît Doumenc; Jérôme Duchemin; Manon Duprat; Fabien François; Nicolas Gendron; Tristant Mirault; Frédéric Pène; Aurélien Philippe; Fanny Pommeret; Olivier Sanchez; David M Smadja; Tali-Anne Szwebel; Aymeric Silvin; Florent Ginhoux; Ludovic Lacroix; Gérôme Jules-Clément; Sarobidy Rapeteramana; Colette Mavier; Laura Steller; Barbara Perniconi; Fabrice André; Damien Drubay; Michaela Fontenay; Sophie Hüe; Stéphane Paul; Eric Solary
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Factors associated to the duration of COVID-19 lockdowns in Chile.

Authors:  Jessica Pavani; Jaime Cerda; Luis Gutiérrez; Inés Varas; Iván Gutiérrez; Leonardo Jofré; Oscar Ortiz; Gabriel Arriagada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Rethinking Autism Intervention Science: A Dynamic Perspective.

Authors:  Yun-Ju Chen; Eric Duku; Stelios Georgiades
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.157

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.