Synthesis and biological evaluation of thiazolidinedione derivatives with high ligand efficiency to P. aeruginosa PhzS.

The thiazolidinone ring is found in compounds that have widespan biology activity and there is mechanism-based evidence that compounds bearing this moiety inhibit P. aeruginosa PhzS (PaPzhS), a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of the virulence factor named pyocyanin. Ten novel thiazolidinone derivatives were synthesised and screened against PaPhzS, using two orthogonal assays. The biological results provided by these and 28 other compounds, whose synthesis had been described, suggest that the dihydroquinazoline ring, found in the previous hit (A- Kd = 18 µM and LE = 0.20), is not required for PaPzhS inhibition, but unsubstituted nitrogen at the thiazolidinone ring is. The molecular simplification approach, pursued in this work, afforded an optimised lead compound (13- 5-(2,4-dimethoxyphenyl)thiazolidine-2,4-dione) with 10-fold improvement in affinity (Kd= 1.68 µM) and more than 100% increase in LE (0.45), which follows the same inhibition mode as the original hit compound (competitive to NADH).Executive summaryPhzS is a key enzyme in the pyocyanin biosynthesis pathway in P. aeruginosa.Orthogonal assays (TSA and FITC) show that fragment-like thiazolidinedione derivatives bind to PaPhzS with one-digit micromolar affinity.Fragment-like thiazolidinedione derivatives bind to the cofactor (NADH) binding site in PaPhzS.The molecular simplification optimised the ligand efficiency and affinity of the lead compound.

Introduction

Compounds bearing the 4-thiazolidinone, 2,4-thiazolidinedione, rhodanine (2-thioxo-4-thiazolidinone) moieties have been explored by medicinal chemists since the 1960s,. In fact, many authors claim that 4-thiazolidinone ring might be considered a privileged scaffold for drug design efforts,. One of the main achievements that have fuelled the drug design efforts with 4-thiazolidinone derivatives was the introduction of antidiabetic drugs to the market (i.e. peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-g (PPAR) agonists and aldose reductase inhibitors) However, this class of compounds has also shown promise in several fields (Figure 1). For instance, 5-arylidene-2,4-thiazolidinone derivatives are low micromolar inhibitors of Pteridine reductase 1 from Leishmania major that are also active against L. braziliensis and L. infantum promastigotes, and benzylidene-2,4-thiazolidinedione derivatives and thiazolidine-2,4-diones derivatives with a carboxylic ester substituent at N-3 have shown activity against protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B). More recently, Froes and co-workers included the inhibition of P. aeruginosa PhzS to the list of biological activities ascribed to compounds bearing the 2,4-thiazolidinedione ring and underscored that these compounds might be employed to battle resistant bacteria.

Figure 1.

Biological activity of selected 4-thiazolidinone derivatives.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) causes more than 700,000 deaths each year and burdens approximately 2 million patients in the USA. To make matters worse, these figures may escalate to 10 million deaths per year if no action is taken. Nevertheless, the investment in the development of novel antibiotics has been steadily decreasing,. The roots for this problem have already been discussed, but most of them are somehow related to the fact that both bactericidal and bacteriostatic drugs are responsible for an evolutionary pressure that selects resistant strains. In order to overcome this dilemma, antivirulence drugs, which aim at ‘disarming’ the pathogens instead of killing them, have been pursued. In contrast to previous studies that focus on quorum sensing modulation, in this work we target enzymes from the pyocyanin (PYO) biosynthesis pathway in P. aeruginosa, a Gram-negative bacillus with high degree of resistance to available drugs, in particular PhzS, an enzyme that catalyses the last step of the PYO biosynthesis, because A) genetic validation (phzs gene knockout) suggests that this protein is crucial for P. aeruginosa infection progression; B) in silico tools predict this target to be druggable; C) the reaction catalysed by PhzS is NADH-dependent,. This last feature prompted the analysis of thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives that might mimic the interaction profile of the purine ring from NADH. These efforts already led to the identification of (E)-5–(4-((4-oxo-3-phenyl-3,4-dihydroquinazolin-2-yl)methoxy)benzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (A) as a low micromolar affinity (Kd= 18 µM) inhibitor of PhzS from P. aeruginosa. If one compares the ligand efficiency (LE) of this compound (0.21) to the LE of other thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives that display a similar competitive mechanism to NADPH (i.e. B- LE = 0.36), it becomes clear that the initial hit should have poor complementarity to its binding site. In order to identify the moieties that are essential for PhzS inhibition, molecular modification strategies, such as replacement of dihydroquinazoline moiety by lipophilic, less-bulky substituents, the addition of aromatic rings at the nitrogen from the thiazolidine-2,4-dione ring, etc. were carried out. The biological profile of those compounds shows that dihydroquinazoline moiety is detrimental to LE and that N-substitution is not compatible with PaPhzS binding. Moreover, the most promising lead compound reported in this work not only has improved affinity to its target (Kd= 1.68 µM) and increased LE (0.45) but also follows the same mode of inhibition of the previous hit (competition with NAD+).

Materials and methods

The reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and the solvents from the Vetec and Dinâmica brands. The reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using Merck Silica gel 60 F254 chromatographic plates, 0.25 mm thick, observed under ultraviolet light of two different wavelengths (254 or 366 nm).

The reactions were carried out in an oil bath with Fisatom model 752 A hot plate with magnetic stirring. The solvents were evaporated under reduced pressure using a Fisatom rotary evaporator, model 550. The melting points were measured in capillaries using a Quimis fusiometer, model 340.23, and are uncorrected. The products were weighed on a Bel analytical balance, model Mark 210 A and dried in a Liobras freeze dryer, L101.

All compounds were characterised by NMR 1H, NMR 13C, and DEPT analyzes. The NMR 1H and NMR 13C spectra were obtained on Varian instruments, model Unity Plus (400 MHz for 1H; 100 MHz for 13C) or Bruker AMX (300 MHz for 1H and 75.5 MHz for 13C), using tetramethylsilane as an internal standard. The multiplicity of signals in the NMR 1H spectra were designated as follows: s (singlet); d (doublet); t (triplet); dd (double doublet); q (quartet); or m (multiplet). The IR spectra were obtained using an Infra-red Absorption Spectrophotometer – FTIR Bruker Model IFS 66 or Perkin Elmer – Spectrum 400 using KBr tablets. For high-resolution mass spectra (HRMS), the electrospray (ESI) ionisation technique was used in positive (ESI+) or negative (ESI-) modes with time-of-flight (TOF) detection, measured on a Shimadzu LC-ESI-qTOF-MS device.

Chemistry

Thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives (1 − 38 - Tables 1 and 2) were obtained by well-established synthetic routes based on Knoevenagel condensation. Compounds 2, 4, 5,, 8–9, 10, 11–17, 18, 19, 22,, 23, 24,, 25,,, 26, 27,, 29, 30, 31,, 32, 33, 35, 37, (Supplementary material) were synthesised according to previously published protocols, whereas novel compounds were synthesised through the general steps described in Figure 2.

Table 1.

N-substituted 5-arylidene-thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives assayed against PaPhzS.

*Novel compounds.

Table 2.

5-arylidene-thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives assayed against PaPhzS.

*Novel compounds.

Figure 2.

General synthesis steps to obtain 2,4-thiazolidinedione derivatives.

The starting compound (thiazolidine-2,4-dione) was obtained as described by Libermann and Himbert (1948), with the modifications proposed by Albuquerque et al. (1995). This reaction occurs by condensation of monochloroacetic acid and thiourea in an aqueous medium under reflux for 24 h. Molecular formula C3H3O2NS; yield 78%; mp 118–120 °C; Rf 0.48 (0.9:0.1 CHCl3/MeOH). Recrystallization: water.

General synthesis of novel N-substituted 5-benzylidene-thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives (1, 3, 6 and 7)

Compounds 1, 3, 6 and 7 were synthesised in two steps. First, a solution of KOH dissolved in methanol was added drop-wise, under constant stirring, to thiazolidine-2,4-dione solubilised in 10 ml of methanol (1:1 molar ratio). After 15 min, under magnetic stirring, the appropriate phenacyl bromide was added drop-wise to the reaction mixture, which was kept under reflux for 24 h. After that, the reaction product was filtered and washed with ice-cold ethanol. In the second step, the product obtained in the previous step was dissolved in methanol and two drops of piperidine. After 10 min, equimolar amounts of the appropriate aromatic benzaldehyde were added to the flask, which was kept at 75 °C, under magnetic stirring and reflux for 8 h. Then, the product was filtered and washed with ice-cold ethanol, crystallised, and dried in an oven at 40 °C.

(Z) 5–(5-chloro-2-hydroxybenzylidene)-3-(3chlorobenzyl)thiazolidine-2,4-dione

Chemical formula: C17H11Cl2NO3S; MW 378.9837; mz 378.9837 (100%); Yield: 55%; MP 201–202 °C; Rf. 0.55 (CHCl3:MeOH; 9.6:0.4). Infra-red (KBr, cm−1 1716 (C=O4); 1676 (C=O2); 1605 (C=C). NMR 1H (300 MHz, CDCl3 (δppm): 5.51 s 2H, CH2. 8.21; 5.36 (s 1H OH); 8.22 s 1H C=H; 6.83 (d 1H J = 7.5) 7.19 (d 1H J = 7.45) 7.14 (s 1H Ar) Benzylidene. 7.44 (s 1H Ar); 7.29 (ddd 1H, H4 J = 7.10; 1.5;1.5) Ar; 7.12 (ddd J = 7.5, 1.5, 1.5 Ar), benzyl. NMR 13C (CDCl3) (DEPT MHz):δ ppm: 171.51 (C=O2); 163.3 (C=O4) 116.00 C=C; 143.79 C=H, 47.1 CH2; 144.58; 135 01; 133.12; 127.21; 126.11; 132.21 (benzyl). 154.3, 131.2;128.2; 127.1;119.1; 118.1 (benzylidene) HRMS+, 378.9837 (100%) calculated, 378.9828.

(Z)-3–(3-chlorobenzyl)-5–(2,6-dichlorobenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione

Chemical formula: C17H10Cl3NO2S; MW 396,9498; mz 396.9498 (100%); Yield: 57%; MP 110–111 °C; Rf. 0.47 (Hex:CHCl3, 0.7:0.3). Infra-red (KBr, cm−1): (C=C) 1743 (C=O4), 1673 (C=O2); 1610 (C=C). NMR 1H (300 MHz, CDCl3 (δppm): 5.56 (s 2H (CH2); 8.21 s 1H; CH=); 7.52 (dd H3–H5 J = 7.5, 1.5) benzylidene); 7.12 (ddd H3–H6 J = 7.57, 1.50, 1.45). 7.28) (dd 1H, J = 7.51, 1.48 Ar); 7.30 (dd 1H, J = 7.50, 1.50) Ar), benzyl. NMR 13C (CDCl3) (DEPT (75.4 MHz): δppm: 172.9.1. (C=O2); 163.7.21 (C=O4) 115.41 C=C; 146.81 C=H; (143.13; 131.8; 131.21; 133.3; 135.36; 126.65; benzyl). 136.73; 131.63; 129.87; 126.55; 127.53; 132.73, benzylidene). HRMS+ 396. 9498 (100%) calculated, 396.8989 found.

(Z)-3–(2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-5–(4-methylbenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione

Chemical formula: C20H17NO4S; MW. 367.0878; mz 367.0878 (100%) Yield: 78%; MP 174–176 °C; Rf 0.49 (Hex:EtOAc, 0.52:0.48). Infra-red (KBr, cm−1 1746 (C=O4), 1676 (C=O2); 1610 (C=C). NMR 1H (300 MHz, CDCl3 300 MHz (δppm): 7.96 (s 1H, CH=); 6.13 s 2 H (CH2). 3.85 (s 3H, OCH3); 2.37 s 3H (CH3); 7.61 (d H2–H6 J = 7.30, 1.5 Ar); 7.20 (d H3–H5 (J = 7.26, 1.5) Ar; (benzylidene). 7.87 (d H2–H6 (J = 7.26, 1.5 Ar) (benzyl). NMR 13C (CDCl3) (DEPT (75.4 MHz):δ ppm: 55.96, CH3; 55.71 CH2; 197.12 C=O; 174.73 (C=O); 167.3 C=O; 117 C=CH; 145.71 C=CH; 21.45 CH3; 168.09; 114.33 × 2; 132.3 × 2; 129.9 (Ar); 134.8; 129.3 × 2; 128.7 × 2; 138.9 Ar. HRMS+, (367.0878 (100%) calculated, 367.0873 (100%) found.

(Z)-5–(3,4-dichlorobenzylidene)-3–(2-(4-nitrophenyl)thiazolidine-2,4-dione

Chemical formula: C18H10Cl2N2O5S; MW. 367.4183; mz 367.0878 (100%); Yield: 78%; MP 230–231 °C; Rf 0.49 (CHCl3:Hex, 0.8:0.2). Infrared (KBr, cm−1 1749 (C=O4), 1678 (C=O2); 1615 (C=C). NMR 1H (300 MHz, CDCl3 300 MHz (δppm): 5.88 (s 2H CH2); 8.33 (d 1H J = 7.12), 8.38 (d 1H, J = 7.15); 7.97s 1H C=H; 7.57 (d 1H J = 7.52 Ar); 7.41 d 1H J = 7.51 Ar) 7.22 (s 1H Ar). NMR 13C (CDCl3) (DEPT (75.4 MHz):δ ppm: 55.15 (CH2), 194.7 (C=O). 171.81 (C=O2); 163.33 (C=O4); 115.61 C=C; (127.98, 121.7, 153.02, 127.98, 121.7, 140.87 Ar) (133.61; 126.7; 128.41; 131.81; 133.15 Ar). HRMS+, 367.0878 calculated, 367.0715 found.

General synthetic steps for novel 5-arylidene-thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives (7, 19–21, 28, 33–34, 36, 38)

Method: In a round bottom flask, 0.100 g (0.85 mmol) of Thiazolidine-2,4-dione (Ju-32) and 4 ml of ethanol were mixed, with stirring, until the complete solubilisation. Then, 2 drops of piperidine were added. The mixture was kept under magnetic stirring at room temperature for 10 min. After this time, 0.17 g (0.85 mmol) of benzaldehyde was added. The flask was kept at 75 °C, under magnetic stirring and reflux for 5–15 h, depending on each aldehyde. After cooling the solvent, the product was filtered through ice-cold ethanol.

(Z) 5–(2-bromo-3-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione

Chemical formula: C11H8BrNO4S; MW 328.9357; mz 328.9357 (100%). Yield: 59%; MP 245 °C Rf. 0.51 (0.9:0.1 (CHCl3: MeOH). Infra-red (KBr, cm−1): 1746 (C=O4), 1676 (C=O2); 1610 (C=C). NMR 1H (300 MHz, CDCl3 300 MHz (δ ppm): 13.12 (s 1H (NH); 8.21 (s 1H, CH=); 6.73 (d 1H, H5, J = 7,48); 3.81 (s 3H, CH3) 5.37 (s 1H, OH). NMR 13C (CDCl3) (DEPT (75.4 MHz):δ ppm: 167.5. (C=O2); 166.27 (C=O4); 117.01 C=C; 142.58 CH=; (Ar 130.01; 115.31; 142.15; 153.18; 111.32; 123.01). HRMS+, (328.9357 (100%) calculated, 328.9348 (100%) found.

(Z)-5–(3-bromo-4-methylbenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione

Chemical formula: C11H8BrNO2S; MW 296.9459; mz 296.9459 (100%); Yield: 61%; MP 196–197 °C. Rf 0.50 (8.5:1.5 Hex. AcOEt). Infra-red (KBr, cm−1): 1745 (C=O), 1673 (C=O); 1610 (C=C). NMR 1H (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): (δ ppm) 12.89 NH (amide), 7.94, s 1 H CH=; 7.47 s 1 H2; 7.10, d 1H5 J = 7.43 Ar) 7.55 dd 1H6 J = 7.5, 1.48; 2.37 s 3H (CH3). NMR 13C (DEPT (75.5 MHz, DMSO-d6): (δ ppm) 166.92 (C=O); 167.0 (C=O); 115.98 C=C; 143.23 CH=; (133.97, 129.87, 124.11; 137.17; 130.81; 128.01 Ar); 23.91 (CH3). HRMS+, 296.9459 (100%) calculated 296.9145 found.

(Z-5–(2,4,5-trimethoxybenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione)

Chemical formula: C13H13NO5S; MW 295.0419; mz 295.0514 (100%); Yield: 67%; MP. 158–160 °C Rf. 0.52 (0.83:0.17 Hex; AcOEt). Infra-red (KBr, cm −1): 1747 (C=O4), 1651 (C=O2); 1611 (C=C). NMR 1H (300 MHz, CDCl3 300 MHz (δ ppm): 12.76 (s 1H NH); 8.21 (s 1H, CH=); 3.84 (s 3 OCH3. orto, meta, para Ar) 6.43 (s 1H CH meta) 6.70 (s 1H CH para). NMR 13C (CDCl3) (DEPT (75.4 MHz): δ ppm: 166.9 (C=O2); 166.35 (C=O4) 116.31 C=C; 143.57 CH=; 55.91 × 3 CH3. 108.5; 136.1; 99.31; 151.19; 142.51; 111.02 CH, Ar). HRMS+, 295.0514 (100%) calculated, 295.0413 found.

(Z)-5-(isoquinolin-4-ylmethylene)thiazolidin-2,4-dione

Chemical formula: C13H8N2O2S; MW 256.2798; mz 256.0306 (100%); Yield: 77%; MP 118–119.5 °C. Rf. 0.51 (0.99:0.01 MeOH:CHCl3). Infra-red (KBr, cm −1):), 1623 (C=C), NMR 1H (300 MHz, CDCl3 300 MHz (δ ppm): 12.32 (s 1H (NH); 11.12 s 1H NH; 7.97; (s 1H, CH=); 7.87 (s 1 H, CH); 7.15; (d 1H)d Ar); 7.15 (dd, 1H (J = 7.1; 1.5)) Ar; 6.98 (dd 1H, J = 7.51; 1.5). 7.27 (dd 1H J = 7.1; 1.5). 7.68 dd J = 7.51. 1.50 Ar). NMR 13C (CDCl3) (DEPT (75.4 MHz):δ ppm: 166.81 (C=O2); 165.27 (C=O4) 121.11 C=C; 142.8 CH=; (137.26; 112.8; 121.93; 120.03; 120.73; 119.87; 128.07 Ar) HRMS+, 256.2798 (100%) calculated, 256.0235 found.

(Z)-5-((2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)methylene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione

Chemical formula: C14H9NO3S; MW 271.0303; mz 271.0303. (100%); Yield: 69%; MP 194–195 °C; Rf. 0.49 (0.96:0.04, CHCl3:MeOH). Infra-red (KBr, cm−1): 1754 (C=O4), 1676 (C=O2); 1615 (C=C). NMR 1H (300 MHz, CDCl3 300 MHz (δ ppm): 12.32 (s 1H (NH); 8.21 (s 1H, CH=); 5.37 (s 1H, OH); 7.78 (dd CH J = 7.1, 1.5); 7.52 (dd, H1; H3) J = 7.59; 1.5). 7.43 (dd J = 7.2, 1.5). 7.42 (dd J = 7.4, 1.51); 7.42, (dd J = 7.4, 1.51); 8.01 dd (J = 7.1; 1.5). 7.76 (d 1H, (J = 7.1); 6.97 (d 1H, J = 7.0). NMR 13C (CDCl3) (DEPT (75.4 MHz): δ ppm: 167.51 (C=O2); 166.38 (C=O4) 117.06 C=C; 143.79 CH=; 155.3 C–OH; 120.0; 130.0 128.4; 130.1; 127.5, 123.5; 127.0; 122.8 128.7 Ar.). HRMS+, 271.0303 (100%). Calculated, 271.0299 found.

(Z)-5-((E)-3–(2-nitrophenyl)allylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione

Chemical formula: C12H8N2O4S; MW 276.2679. mz 276.0205. (100%); Yield: 69%; MP 119–120 °C. Rf. 0.52 (0.86:0.14 Hex; AcOEt). Infra-red (KBr, cm−1): 1746 (C=O4), 1677 (C=O2); 1612 (C=C). NMR 1H (300 MHz, CDCl3 (δ ppm): 13.24 (s 1H (NH); 7.97 (s 1H, CH=); 6.89 (d 1H, CH=) 7.39 (d 1H CH=) (8.01 dd 1H, J = 7.5, J = 1.5, Ar) (7.82 dd J = 7.5; J = 1.5), 7.91 (ddd 1H J = 7.5, 1.5, Ar); 7.89 (dd; 2H J = 7.0; 1.5 Ar). NMR 13C (CDCl3) (DEPT (75.4 MHz): δ ppm: 168.12 (C=O2); 167.91 (C=O4) 119.07 C=C; 136; 126.04, 47.9; 124.01; 123.90; 129.01; 135.60; 127.28 HRMS+, 276.0205 (100%) calculated, 276.0201 found.

Biological methods

Expression and purification enzymes

The expression and purification of the PhzS from P. aeruginosa was performed as described by Greenhagen and co-workers with minor modifications to improve the overall yield. Briefly, E. coli Rosetta (DE3) cells, containing the pET28a plasmid that codes for PhzS from P. aeruginosa, were grown at 37 °C (180 RPM), in LB medium supplemented with kanamycin (30 µg/mL) and chloramphenicol (34 µg/mL), until the OD600 reached 0.6−0.8. Then, Isopropyl-b-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) was added to the culture (final concentration 250 µM) and the temperature was reduced to 18 °C. After 24 h, the cells were harvested by centrifugation (100,000 RPM, Avanti J-E centrifuge (Beckman Coulter), 4 °C, 30 min) and resuspended in Potassium Phosphate buffer (50 mM) pH 8.0, supplemented with 300 mM NaCl and 1 mM phenylmethanesulphonylfluoride (PMSF). Next, the cells were disrupted by sonication (10–15 s bursts with 30 s intervals between each burst, 8 Watts) in an ice bath. The soluble fraction was clarified by centrifugation (16000 rpm, 20 min, 4 °C) and then loaded onto a HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare), pre-equilibrated with buffer A (Potassium Phosphate 50 mM (pH 8.0), NaCl (300 mM) and imidazole (20 mM)). The column was washed with 20 column volumes (CV) of buffer A and then with increasing concentrations of imidazole (50–500 mM) added to buffer A. All purification steps were followed by SDS–PAGE 12% and the final protein concentration was evaluated by measuring the UV⁄ vis absorbance at 280 nm (theoretical extinction coefficient of 1.352 M−1 cm−1 according to ProtParam server, available in (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/). The purified protein was stored in 30% glycerol at −80 °C until use.

Screening of thiazolidinedione derivatives by thermal shift assay (TSA)

TSA assays were performed on Applied Biosystems 7500 RT-PCR (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA USA), fitted with custom filter sets. All assays were carried out in triplicate on a 96-well PCR plate (PCR plates 96 well BioRad®), manually sealed with transparent capping strips (Flatcap strips BioRad®). The plates were centrifuged for 2 min, 2000 rpm, at 25 °C and then the fluorescence of SYPROTM orange (S6650) was monitored (excitation wavelength= 492 nm and emission wavelength= 610 nm), while the plate was heated from 25 to 85 °C, in increments of 1 °C per minute.

The TSA conditions employed in this work were previously optimised. Briefly, 5 µl of PaPhzS (5 µM final concentration), 1 µl of SYPROTM orange (5X), 13 µl of assay buffer (50 mM potassium phosphate, 300 mM NaCl, pH 8), and 1 µl DMSO (5% v/v), as a negative control, or the putative inhibitor (diluted in DMSO) were added to each well. All experiments were carried out in triplicate

Raw fluorescence data were recorded within the Applied Biosystems 7500 Software v2.0, and then exported to NAMI for Tm calculation by the first-derivative method. Differences between Tm values (ΔTm) were considered statistically significant when p < .01, according to the One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post-test for multiple comparisons, available in GraphPad Prism 8.0 software (GraphPadV® Software, San Diego, CA, USA, www.graphpad.com).

Mode of inhibition by TSA

The mode of inhibition (competitive, non-competitive, uncompetitive) was evaluated by comparison to the thermal signatures described by Lea and co-workers. Hence, the ΔTm due to different concentrations of each thiazolidinedione derivative was employed to build sigmoid dose-response curves (APO-Tm curves), using non-linear regression (three parameters), available in GraphPad Prism 8.0 software (GraphPad® Software, San Diego, CA, USA, www.graphpad.com) (Equation (1)). where Y represents the biological response, Bottom stands for the minimum inhibition observed, Top is the maximum inhibition achieved and X is the concentration of the compound, on a molar scale, that affords each Y value.

Similarly, ΔTm obtained in the presence of NADH and NAD+ (0.6 mM), and phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA) (1.0 mM) were employed to calculate the NADH-Tm, NAD+-Tm and the PCA-Tm curves. All measurements were carried out in triplicate and the sigmoid curves for each experiment were compared visually.

Compounds’ affinity calculation by TSA

The effect of ligand’s concentration (ranging from 3.12 to 200 µM) over the PaPhzS Tm (5 µM final concentration) was evaluated using the same parameters described in section (2.2.2). Next, the fraction of unfolded PaPhzS at 43 °C were employed to calculate the compounds Kd, using the DSFit software (default parameters), as described by Bai and co-workers. The ΔCp value (0.69) required for this calculation was predicted by hydrophobic surface area-based method available on http://www.ibi.vu.nl/programs/bicepwww/. Briefly, the heat capacity (C) was calculated at two temperatures: 25 °C (before PhzS unfolding [T1]) and 50 °C (after PzhS unfolding [T2]) using Equation (2). where T stands for temperature in Kelvin. Therefore T1 = 298.15 K, T2 = 323.15 K.

Compounds’ affinity to covalently modified PaPhzS

PaPhzS (2 mg/mL) was incubated with fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate (FITC) dye (6 mg/mL) containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 8.0) for 2 h, at 25 °C. Then, the solution was loaded on a Hi-Trap HP desalting column (GE Healthcare), previously equilibrated with 50 mM HEPES buffer (pH 8) and 2 CV of the same buffer were injected. The absorbance of the collected fractions was monitored at 280 nm and 490 nm and those with a molar ratio ranging from 0.3 and 1.0 were employed for the Kd calculation experiments, as follows: The fluorescence of PaPhzS-FITC, at 25 °C, using in a real-time thermocycler (AppliedBiosystem7500) equipped with the FAN filter (excitation 498 nm and emission 530 nm wavelengths) for 10 min in the presence of different concentrations of each compound (3.12–100.0 µM). The Raw fluorescence data, recorded within the Applied Biosystems 7500 Software v2.0, was employed for non-linear regression analysis (three parameters) (Equation 1), as available in GraphPad Prism 8.0 software (GraphPadV® Software, San Diego, CA, USA, www.graphpad.com). All experiments were carried out in triplicate using 96-well PCR plate (PCR plates 96 well BioRad®), manually sealed with transparent capping strips (Flatcap strips BioRad®).

Results

Screening and Kd determination of thiazolidinone derivatives

TSA carried out at a single-concentration (50 µM) shows that approximately 60% of the compounds increase PhzS Tm value more than 0.5 °C, however, this effect is statistically significant just for compounds 3, 9 12, 13, 15, 16, 20, 25, 26, 28, 33, 37 and 38 (Figure 3). Compounds with negative ΔTm were not considered further. No compound substituted in N1 affords a significant change in PaPhzS Tm. Apart from compound 33, the replacement of benzylidene ring by fused-rings (30–35) affords compounds that do not bind to PaPhzS. In order to reduce the number of false-positive hits identified in the initial screening, the effect of compounds 12, 13, 15, 16, 20, 25, 26, 28, 33, 37 and 38 were also evaluated at different concentrations. Among these compounds, 12, 13, 15, 16, 20, 28 and 33 showed a clear concentration-response profile (Figure 4 and Figure 1(S) – Supplementary material), which excludes a non-specific interaction to PaPhzS.

Figure 3.

(A) Single-dose screening of thiazolidinedione derivatives (50 µM) against PhzS from P. aeruginosa, by TSA. The ΔTm values represents the mean ± SD of the changes in Tm of each compounds (**p < .01, ****p < .0001 compared with reference (DMSO)); (B) Raw data from TSA. All data represent the mean ± SD from three independent experiments.

Figure 4.

Effect of different concentrations of compounds 12, 13, 15 and 20 over the PaPhzSTm values (upper panel – A–D) and over the fraction on unfolded PaPhzS (lower panel – E–H) at 43 C. ΔTm was calculated in comparison to DMSO (control) and Kd values were calculated using DSFit software. Plots were generated with GraphPad Prism v.8.0. All data represent the mean ± SD from three independent experiments.

On the other hand, compounds 25 and 26 displayed a flat response in the concentration range investigated (3.12–100.0 µM) (Figure 1S – Supplementary material). Considering that 25 and 28 differ only at the substitution pattern at one position (2,3,4 OCH3 vs. 1,3,4 OCH3, respectively), it seems that substituents at meta play a crucial role towards PaPhzS binding. Compounds 37 and 38 showed a small variation in ΔTm, along with poor fit (r2 < 0.7) (Figure 1S – Supplementary material) and for that reason they were discarded.

Although some authors suggest that the compounds’ affinity (Kd values) might be calculated directly from those curves with reasonable accuracy, there is some concern about the thermodynamic basis for this approach. Bai and co-workers devised an elegant workaround that limitation, which relies on the percentage of unfolded protein at a fixed temperature. Using this approach, the Kd values were calculated at 43 °C, which is close to the PaPhzS Tm value in the absence of ligands (42 °C), so that the fraction of folded and unfolded protein was close to 1,0. According to Bai and co-workers (2019) Kd values close to the protein concentration (5 µM) or lower should be taken with scepticism. However, only one compound had Kd value in this range (compound 16 -Kd = 4.2 µM). The other compounds display affinity ranging from 10.5 − 50.5 µM (compound 20 and compound 33 respectively) (Figure 4 and Supplementary material Figure 3S). As these Kd values were obtained at a temperature higher than the physiologic one, we decided to employ an orthogonal assay to evaluate the compounds’ affinity. In order to achieve this goal, PaPhzS was labelled with FITC and the effects of different concentration of each inhibitor on the covalently modified PaPhzS was monitored at 25 °C (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Effect of different concentrations of compounds 12, 13, 15, 16, 20 and 33 over the fluorescence signal (498 nm (excitation) and 530 nm (emission) wavelengths) of covalently labelled PhzS from P. aeruginosa (PaPhzS-FITC). Kd values were calculated by non-linear regression as available in GraphPad Prism v.8.0. All data represent the mean ± SD from three independent experiments.

According to this assay, three compounds (13, 16 and 20) are low micromolar ligands of PaPhzS, this result is in good agreement with previous results that also suggest these are the most promising compounds. The lower values of Kd obtained here might be a consequence of the reduced temperature employed in this assay. Although this assay also agrees that 12, 15 and 33 have low affinity to PaPhzS their affinity for PaPhzS-FITC is even lower than calculated by DSFit for PaPhzS. Since 13 and 28 differ by one OCH3, it is tentative to assume that this moiety causes steric hindrance and abolishes the activity. In fact, no compound is substituted, simultaneously, at R3 and R4 is active. Moreover, comparison of compound 15 and 16 Kd values (166 µM ± 0.46 vs. 6.18 µM ± 0.19, respectively) and compound 19 (ΔTm close to zero) supports the hypothesis that di-substitution at meta position is detrimental to the affinity.

Inhibition mode determination by TSA

Since the catalytic efficiency of PaPhzS to convert PCA to hydroxy-phenazine is low and requires an excess of NADH (cofactor), using kinetic assays to evaluate the mode of inhibition might be misleading. Considering that TSA has been employed as a suitable alternative to achieve this goal,, we employed this approach to confirm that the most promising compound (13) binds to the cofactor binding site, through the analysis of its thermal shift signature in the presence and absence of either the cofactor to the substrate (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Thermal shift signatures of compound 13 in presence/absence of PCA (A) or NADH (B) or NAD+ (C). All data represent the mean ± SD from three independent experiments.

Previously, we have shown that both the substrate and the cofactor cause a concentration-dependent decrease in PaPhzS’s Tm value. Then, the ΔTm curves of PaPhzS in the presence of a fixed concentration of either NADH (0.6 mM) or PCA (1.0 mM are displaced south of the curve in their absence. Nevertheless, in the presence of either NADH or PCA, the curves are parallel to those seen in their absence. This profile is the opposite of the one described by Lea and co-workers, but the overall analysis of the thermal signature holds: The parallel curves observed for compound 13 in the presence and absence of the PCA/NADH are compatible with the non-competitive mode of inhibition towards both the substrate and cofactor. This result might seem unexpected, once thiazolidinedione derivatives were expected to mimic the binding profile of the purine ring from NADH. One reasonable explanation is that FAD is readily reduced to FADH in the presence of NADH (Data not shown), and then NAD + leaves the binding site, thus not affecting compound 13’s affinity to PaPhzS. In order to support this hypothesis, we avoided the conformational shift that would expel NAD + from its binding site, by performing the assay in the presence of NAD+. As anticipated, the curves get closer as the concentration of compound 13 increases, suggesting a competitive mode of inhibition to this compound and corroborating its binding profile to the cofactor binding site.

Discussion

The development of novel antibiotic drugs continues to be of utmost importance,. However, the research and development of novel antibiotic drugs by the Big-Pharma industries has steadily declined in the last decades,. There are some promising alternatives to deal with this issue,. Among them, anti-virulence drug development relies on the hypothesis that is better to “live in peace with the enemy” than to kill it. One way to achieve this goal is by rendering the pathogenic bacteria harmless to the human host and assuming this process will put less evolutive pressure on the microorganism than the currently available drugs. Much effort has been put into the inhibition of pigmented virulence factors such as staphyloxanthin and pyocyanin, but the approach is taken to their modulation is rather distinct. The first relies on the inhibition of druggable targets that are responsible for staphyloxanthin biosynthesis,, whereas the second is focussed on the modulation of quorum sensing mechanisms that lie upstream the biosynthetic pathway that builds up this virulence factor.

According to Ni and co-workers (2019), targeting enzymes from the pyocyanin biosynthesis pathway is a valid and underexplored strategy. In accordance with this standpoint of view, it has been proposed that PaPhzS is a druggable target and we have shown that thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives, bearing a dihydroquinazoline ring at the para position of the benzylidene ring, have a micromolar affinity to PhzS from P. aeruginosa and reduce pyocyanin production without a significant impact on the cell growth rate. The most promising compound (Figure 1(A)) might be employed for hit-to-lead optimisation efforts, but a careful analysis of its ligand efficiency argues otherwise. Molecular obesity has been one of the largest problems in drug development campaigns in the last decades, and our initial effort to identify PaPhzS inhibitors seems to suffer from the same problem. In general, hits with LE> 0.30 have a higher success rate than those with lower LE, since this metric is highly correlated to high steric and electronic complementarity within the binding site. The low LE value for the previous hit (1A- LE= 0.21) suggests that some moieties are detrimental for it to fit into the binding site. This comes as no surprise, once molecular complexity is inversely related to LE. Hence, an obvious alternative to increase LE is to strip the molecules from auxophoric groups and to focus on the chemical features that are essential for biological activity. Considering that previous work suggests the thiazolidine-2,4-dione ring mimics the cofactor binding profile, it was decided to evaluate whether N1- substituted compounds would bind to PaPhzS. The lack of activity seen in N1-substituted compounds (1–7) supports that the H-bonding capability of the nitrogen within the thiazolidine-2,4-dione ring is essential for PaPhzS binding. This result is in good agreement with the morphological similarity analysis carried out for dihydroquinazoline substituted thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives.

Next, the replacement of the central phenyl by fused heteroaromatic rings was probed. In contrast to N1 substitution, this strategy affords compounds that bind to PaPhzS with two-digit micromolar affinity (i.e. 33 PaPhzS-FITC-Kd = 84.2 µM and DSFit-Kd > 50). However, additional studies are required to settle once and for all if this is a promising lead-optimisation strategy since the substitution pattern on this ring remains unexplored. Following a more conservative approach, it was decided to replace dihydroquinazoline moiety with less-bulky substituents. This strategy afforded compounds with lower affinity, but with higher LE (12 and 15) than the initial hit (Figure 1(A)) (Table 3).

Table 3.

The binding affinity (Kd), ligand efficiency (LE)* and binding efficiency index (BEI)# of PaPhzS inhibitors.

DSFit software				FITC
	Kd (μM)	LE	BEI	Kd (μM)	LE	BEI
1A (previous hit)	9.3	0.21	11.0	18.0**	0.21	10.4
Mol 12	36.6	0.36	17.6	133 ± 0.4	0.32	15.4
Mol 13	17.7	0.37	17.9	1.68 ± 0.2	0.44	21.8
Mol 15	37.2	0.36	13.3	166 ± 0.5	0.31	11.4
Mol 16	4.2	0.47	21.0	6.18 ± 0.2	0.45	20.4
Mol 20	10.5	0.38	15.0	3.3 ± 0.3	0.42	16.6
Mol 33	50.0	0.30	14.9	84.2 ± 0.2	0.28	14.1

*LE: 1.4*pKd/HA, where heavy (non-hydrogen) atoms [82].

#BEI: (pKd/MW)×1000, where MW is molecular weight (Da) [83].

**Kd value calculated by microscale thermophoresis [11].

One might argue that LE provides an unfair advantage for fragment-like compounds such as those reported here, especially for compounds bearing halogen substituents. This concern is, at least partially, taken into account by the binding efficiency index, which considers the compounds’ molecular weight instead of their heavy-atom count. When this metric is employed compound 15 displays the lowest BEI among the thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives reported in this work, but its value remains in the same range as the previous hit (BEI 1A = 10.4 vs. 15 = 11.4). On the other hand, both assays show a significant improvement in the affinity and efficiency of 13 (Kd 1.68, LE = 0.45, BEI 21.79), 16 (Kd 6.18 LE = 0.46, BEI 20.42) and 20 (kd LE = 0.43, BEI 16.71). In an attempt to relate the structural changes in compounds with their putative interactions within the binding pocket, the difference in free energy of binding among those compounds (ΔΔGbinding = RTln(Kda/Kdb) where Kda and Kdb represent the affinity of two compounds being compared, R = 8.31 J/Kmol and T = 298.15 K) can be calculated. ΔΔGbinding between compounds 12 and 13, using PaPhzS-FITC-Kd values, yields a difference that is compatible with an H-bond (2.6 Kcal/mol). Similar values are seen for the comparison between compounds 13 and 15 (2.7 Kcal/mol), compounds 12 and 20 (2.2 Kcal/mol) and compounds 15 and 20 (2.3 Kcal/mol). These values support the importance of H-bonding ability to potency. This feature might be correlated with the keto-enol tautomerism as well as the planarity between the 5-arylidene and the thiazolidine-2,4-dione moieties, which are affected by electron-donating/accepting substituents decorating the ring. In fact, para electron-accepting groups that stabilise the keto-form only afford inactive compounds (8–11), and except for compound 20, the same can be stated for substituents in the ortho position (either R1 or R5). On the other hand, steric restraints also play a key role for thiazolidine-2,4-dione binding affinity, as observed for meta disubstituted compounds: 19 and 25 are inactive, whereas 15 shows reduced affinity in comparison to 13, 16 or 20, all of which have only one substitution at meta position.

When molecular simplification is carried out, conformational flexibility may cause the novel compounds to adopt new bioactive conformations or even explore small binding clefts that were inaccessible at first. The results provided by the mode of inhibition studies suggest this is not the case for the compounds reported in this work and suggests the same structure-activity relationships hold for the whole series. Last but not least, careful analysis of TSA raw curves (Figure 2S – Supplementary material) hint that these compounds do not behave as classical PAINS, which reinforces their usefulness as a promising scaffold to design novel mechanism-based inhibitors of PaPhzS.

Conclusion

One approach to overcome the dilemma relies on bacterial virulence modulation. Although pyocyanin is a virulence factor from Pseudomonas aeruginosa employed as an end-point in most anti-virulence drug development projects, the enzymes responsible for its biosynthesis remain largely unexplored as potential therapeutic targets. The results described here show that unsubstituted N1 at the thiazolidine-2,4-dione ring is essential for PaPhzS inhibition and that molecular simplification of (E)-5–(4-((4-oxo-3-phenyl-3,4-dihydroquinazolin-2-yl)methoxy)benzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione affords improved lead compounds that retain the original mode of inhibition (competitive to NAD+). Moreover, steric clashes due to simultaneous substitution at both meta positions are detrimental to 5-arylidene-thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives affinity. However, there seems to be some plasticity within PaPhzS binding site, since the replacement of benzyl ring by indole substituted ring does not abolish the affinity. Taken together, this information paves the way to develop the third round of PaPhzS inhibitors with improved potency.

Click here for additional data file.