Literature DB >> 34080353

Novel Imaging Parameters for Right Ventricular Dysfunction after Pericardiectomy in Constrictive Pericarditis.

Yong Hyun Park1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34080353      PMCID: PMC8592677          DOI: 10.4250/jcvi.2021.0074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Imaging


× No keyword cloud information.
Pericardiectomy is the only definitive treatment option for patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis who have persistent and prominent symptoms, though it poses significant perioperative morbidity and mortality.1) A mortality rate between 4 and 8 percent was noted in patients who underwent pericardiectomy between 1977 and 2012.2)3)4) Right ventricular (RV) failure is one of the major complications of early post-pericardiectomy.5) Although a rapid increase in venous return to the right heart after pericardial decompression is a presumed cause of RV failure at early post-pericardiectomy,5) preoperatively elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase, decreased protein, and high-grade tricuspid regurgitation could predict RV failure after surgery.6)7) In this issue of Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, Azzu et al.8) devised a “pericardial score” system using multimodality imaging parameters that could predict RV function and the clinical course of patients post-pericardiectomy. The combined “pericardial score” system consisted of epicardial fat thickness < 5 mm (1 point), thickened pericardium > 5 mm (1 point), and pericardial calcification on computed tomography (1 point). Unfortunately, because of its high prevalence, early postoperative RV dysfunction could not be predicted effectively by “pericardial score.” On the contrary, patients with a high “pericardial score,” i.e., lower epicardial fat thickness, a calcified and thickened pericardium, and smaller RV cavity size, were at increased risk for prolonged inotropic support. Despite inhomogeneity of imaging modalities performed in the study, it has advantages over others in that it provided novel imaging parameters that can help identify patients at higher risk for RV dysfunction early post-pericardiectomy. In conclusion, Azzu et al. 8) found that RV dysfunction is prevalent and transient during the early period of post-pericardiectomy, and predictors for prolonged inotropic support include a smaller preoperative RV cavity size and a novel pericardial score based on epicardial fat thickness, pericardial calcification, and pericardial thickness.
  8 in total

1.  Pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis: a clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic evaluation of two surgical techniques.

Authors:  Ujjwal K Chowdhury; Ganapathy K Subramaniam; A Sampath Kumar; Balram Airan; Rajvir Singh; Sachin Talwar; Sandeep Seth; Pankaj K Mishra; Kizakke K Pradeep; Siddhartha Sathia; Panangipalli Venugopal
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Right-Sided Heart Failure and Extracorporeal Life Support in Patients Undergoing Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis: A Risk Factor Analysis for Adverse Outcome.

Authors:  Erik Beckmann; Issam Ismail; Serghei Cebotari; Alexander Busse; Andreas Martens; Malakh Shrestha; Christian Kühn; Axel Haverich; Christine Fegbeutel
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Constrictive pericarditis: diagnosis, management and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Terrence D Welch
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Constrictive pericarditis: risks, aetiologies and outcomes after total pericardiectomy: 24 years of experience.

Authors:  Gábor Szabó; Bastian Schmack; Cem Bulut; Pál Soós; Alexander Weymann; Susanne Stadtfeld; Matthias Karck
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Experience With Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis Over Eight Decades.

Authors:  Takashi Murashita; Hartzell V Schaff; Richard C Daly; Jae K Oh; Joseph A Dearani; John M Stulak; Katherine S King; Kevin L Greason
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Transient right ventricular dysfunction after pericardiectomy in patients with constrictive pericarditis.

Authors:  Hee Tae Yu; Jong-Won Ha; Sak Lee; Chi Young Shim; Jeonggeun Moon; In-Jeong Cho; Min-Kyung Kang; Woo-In Yang; Donghoon Choi; Namsik Chung
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.243

7.  Long-term results of radical pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis in Korean population.

Authors:  Min Suk Choi; Dong Seop Jeong; Jae K Oh; Sung-A Chang; Sung-Ji Park; Suryeun Chung
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Cardiac Decompression by Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis: Multimodality Imaging to Identify Patients at Risk for Prolonged Inotropic Support.

Authors:  Alessia Azzu; Marco Morosin; Alexios S Antonopoulos; Massimo Capoccia; Ulrich Rosendahl; Raad Mohiaddin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-05-06
  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Multimodality Imaging of Constrictive Pericarditis: Pathophysiology and New Concepts.

Authors:  Sumit Sohal; Sheetal Vasundara Mathai; Kevin Lipat; Arpanjeet Kaur; Gautam Visveswaran; Marc Cohen; Sergio Waxman; Nidhish Tiwari; Esad Vucic
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.955

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.