Literature DB >> 34079734

Automatic tool segmentation and tracking during robotic intravascular catheterization for cardiac interventions.

Olatunji Mumini Omisore1,2, Wenke Duan1,2, Wenjing Du1,2, Yuhong Zheng1, Toluwanimi Akinyemi1,3, Yousef Al-Handerish1,3, Wanghongbo Li1, Yong Liu1, Jing Xiong1, Lei Wang1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases resulting from aneurism, thrombosis, and atherosclerosis in the cardiovascular system are major causes of global mortality. Recent treatment methods have been based on catheterization of flexible endovascular tools with imaging guidance. While advances in robotic intravascular catheterization have led to modeling tool navigation approaches with data sensing and feedback, proper adaptation of image-based guidance for robotic navigation requires the development of sensitive segmentation and tracking models without specificity loss. Several methods have been developed to tackle non-uniform illumination, low contrast; however, presence of untargeted body organs commonly found in X-ray frames taken during angiography procedures still presents some major issues to be solved.
METHODS: In this study, a segmentation method was developed for automatic detection and tracking of guidewire pixels in X-ray angiograms. Image frames were acquired during robotic intravascular catheterization for cardiac interventions. For segmentation, multiscale enhancement filtering was applied on preprocessed X-ray angiograms, while morphological operations and filters were applied to refine the frames for pixel intensity adjustment and vesselness measurement. Minima and maxima extrema of the pixels were obtained to detect guidewire pixels in the X-ray frames. Lastly, morphological operation was applied for guidewire pixel connectivity and tracking in segmented pixels. Method validation was performed on 12 X-ray angiogram sequences which were acquired during in vivo intravascular catheterization trials in rabbits.
RESULTS: The study outcomes showed that an overall accuracy of 0.995±0.001 was achieved for segmentation. Tracking performance was characterized with displacement and orientation errors observed as 1.938±2.429 mm and 0.039±0.040°, respectively. Evaluation studies performed against 9 existing methods revealed that this proposed method provides more accurate segmentation with 0.753±0.074 area under curve. Simultaneously, high tracking accuracy of 0.995±0.001 with low displacement and orientation errors of 1.938±2.429 mm and 0.039±0.040°, respectively, were achieved. Also, the method demonstrated higher sensitivity and specificity values compared to the 9 existing methods, with a relatively faster exaction time.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method has the capability to enhance robotic intravascular catheterization during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Thus, interventionists can be provided with better tool tracking and visualization systems while also reducing their exposure to operational hazards during intravascular catheterization for cardiac interventions. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guidewire segmentation; cardiac interventions; intravascular catheterization; minimally invasive surgery (MIS); pixel tracking; robotic catheter systems

Year:  2021        PMID: 34079734      PMCID: PMC8107332          DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-1119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  17 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in medical imaging: anatomical and clinical applications.

Authors:  Bruno Grignon; Laurence Mainard; Matthieu Delion; Claude Hodez; Guillaume Oldrini
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Multi-scale retinal vessel segmentation using line tracking.

Authors:  Marios Vlachos; Evangelos Dermatas
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Guided image filtering.

Authors:  Kaiming He; Jian Sun; Xiaoou Tang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  Diaphragm border detection in coronary X-ray angiographies: New method and applications.

Authors:  Simeon Petkov; Xavier Carrillo; Petia Radeva; Carlo Gatta
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  Trainable COSFIRE filters for vessel delineation with application to retinal images.

Authors:  George Azzopardi; Nicola Strisciuglio; Mario Vento; Nicolai Petkov
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Radiation Doses to Staff in a Hybrid Operating Room: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study with Active Electronic Dosimeters.

Authors:  Juan Serna Santos; Jouni Uusi-Simola; Touko Kaasalainen; Pekka Aho; Maarit Venermo
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 7.069

7.  Learning-based Parameter Estimation for Hysteresis Modeling in Robotic Catheterization.

Authors:  Olatunji Mumini Omisore; Shipeng Han; Tao Zhou; Yousef Al-Handarish; Wenjing Du; Kamen Ivanov; Lei Wang
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2019-07

8.  Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).

Authors:  Ehtisham Mahmud; Jesse Naghi; Lawrence Ang; Jonathan Harrison; Omid Behnamfar; Ali Pourdjabbar; Ryan Reeves; Mitul Patel
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 11.195

9.  Assessment of coronary artery disease using magnetic resonance coronary angiography: a national multicenter trial.

Authors:  Shingo Kato; Kakuya Kitagawa; Nanaka Ishida; Masaki Ishida; Motonori Nagata; Yasutaka Ichikawa; Kazuhiro Katahira; Yuji Matsumoto; Koji Seo; Reiji Ochiai; Yasuyuki Kobayashi; Hajime Sakuma
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Blood vessel segmentation algorithms - Review of methods, datasets and evaluation metrics.

Authors:  Sara Moccia; Elena De Momi; Sara El Hadji; Leonardo S Mattos
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.