Literature DB >> 34079682

Safety and Efficacy of Maxitrol in Pediatric Age Group Below Two Years With Adenoid Hypertrophy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Mohammed Halawani1, Abdullah Alkhaldi2, Abdullah Almajed1, Ahmed Almutairi2, Maali Alrashed1, Nouf Albakeet1, Wala Alshiha1, Omar Aldibasi3, Jaber Alshammari1.   

Abstract

Introduction Adenoid hypertrophy, a common condition in children, represents one of the common indications for surgery in pediatrics. Medical treatment alone is not effective, and most of the time patients are managed by surgical removal of the adenoid. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of intranasal Maxitrol® drops (Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland) in pediatric patients with adenoid hypertrophy aged less than two years and to document any side effects during its use. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Abdullah Specialist Children's Hospital (KASCH). We reviewed the charts of 86 pediatric patients aged less than two years who were diagnosed with adenoid hypertrophy between 2015 and 2018. Patients were grouped according to the type of intervention (use of Maxitrol®, and no use). The follow-up time was up to one year. Results Out of 86 patients, 55 (63.9%) patients had adenoid hypertrophy alone and 31 (36.1%) had adenoid hypertrophy plus another disease. Patients with obstructive sleep apnea symptoms (p=0.026) and grade of adenoid (p=0.040) showed a significant relationship with surgery booking after one year. The probability of booking for surgery for those who used Maxitrol® was 1.394 times higher than for those who were not using it (odds ratio [OR]=1.394; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.549-3.537). Suppression of growth and eye complications were not reported in any of our patients. Conclusion In this small sample, the use of Maxitrol® in the pediatric age group below two years with adenoid hypertrophy was safe and effective in relieving nasal symptoms; however, eventually, surgery was needed in most of our patients. Suppression of growth and eye complications were not reported in any of our patients during the follow-up time.
Copyright © 2021, Halawani et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adenoid hypertrophy; intranasal corticosteroids; intranasal steroids safety; maxitrol

Year:  2021        PMID: 34079682      PMCID: PMC8162137          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.14736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


Introduction

Adenoids are pyramid-shaped lymphoid tissue located in the nasopharynx [1]. Adenoid hypertrophy is a common disease in pediatrics. It usually presents with symptoms of airway obstruction such as mouth breathing and snoring [2]. Adenoid hypertrophy treatment in pediatrics is determined by the degree of airway obstruction and related comorbidities. Most of the time, it is treated by adenoidectomy. However, medical therapy is crucial and must be tried before surgical intervention. Various studies have been published about the use of intranasal corticosteroids in children, and they have shown promising results [3-8]. Intranasal corticosteroids have been used in pediatric patients aged less than two years at King Abdullah Specialist Children’s Hospital to decrease nasal obstruction symptoms secondary to rhinitis and adenoid hypertrophy. They were the first line of therapy in patients with allergic rhinitis in the past few decades. However, they are not recommended for use in pediatric patients younger than two years due to a lack of evidence on their safety in this age group. To our knowledge, the use of intranasal Maxitrol® in pediatric patients below two years with adenoidal hypertrophy has not been investigated in the literature. Our study aims to assess intranasal Maxitrol’s safety and efficacy in pediatric patients with adenoid hypertrophy aged less than two years and document any side effects during its use, such as eye complications and suppression of growth.

Materials and methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Abdullah Specialist Children’s Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We reviewed the charts and clinical information of pediatric patients aged less than two years who were diagnosed with adenoid hypertrophy between 2015 and 2018. The inclusion criteria were patients aged less than two years with adenoid hypertrophy as the primary disease and complete follow-up. We excluded patients who were using steroids (systemic/nebulizer) and patients with missing data. We reviewed 123 pediatric patients’ files from our electronic healthcare system (BESTcare); however, only 86 patients met our inclusion criteria. Out of 86 patients, 47 used Maxitrol®, while 39 did not take Maxitrol (control group). In our study, Maxitrol® (a sterile drop containing the active ingredients neomycin, polymyxin b, and dexamethasone) was used as two drops in each nostril per day for two to six weeks depending on symptoms improvement. The follow-up time was up to one year. The institutional review board approved this study at King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (RC20/016/R). Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), and the level of significance was declared at α=.05. Categorical variables were presented as percentages, and frequencies continuous variables were reported in terms of means and standard deviations. Patient-specific characteristics included age, gender, height and weight, and the use of Maxitrol®. Patients were grouped according to the type of intervention (use of Maxitrol®, and no use) and compared across other variables using univariate analysis, including χ2 tests and Student t-test. Outcomes obtained included the date of surgery, local eye symptoms, effect on growth parameters, systemic symptoms, delay of surgery, and mortality. Using booking for surgery within one year as an outcome variable, we compared the group who were booked for surgery within one year to the group who were not booked across other variables using univariate analysis, including χ2 tests and Student t-test. Further, a logistic regression model was applied to model the probability of booking surgery within one year.

Results

We analyzed 89 patients to examine the efficacy and safety of Maxitrol® in children below two years old with adenoid hypertrophy. As seen in Table 1, males were dominant (87.2%), with nearly two-thirds (63.9%) diagnosed with adenoid hypertrophy alone. Furthermore, 19.8% were presented without obstructive sleep apnea symptoms. The proportions of patients who reported snoring, sleep disturbance, and apnea were 15.1%, 43%, and 66.7%, respectively. The most commonly diagnosed grade of tonsil was grade 1 (45.3%), followed by grade 2 (40.7%). Likewise, 10.5% presented with asthma and 3.5% with Down syndrome. Furthermore, none of the patients presented with any eye complications. The mean height (cm), weight (kg), and BMI (kg/m2) of the patients were 77.7, 9.89, and 16.5, respectively. Comparing the baseline characteristics of the patients in relation to the use of Maxitrol® revealed that male gender (p<0.001), adenoid hypertrophy plus other diseases (p=0.007), and those without syndrome (p=0.028) were significantly more associated with the use of Maxitrol®.
Table 1

Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics of all patients in relation to the use of Maxitrol®

BMI: body mass index; OSA: obstructive sleep apnea

VariablesLevelsUsed Maxitrol® (n=47) N(%)No Maxitrol® (n=39) N(%)totalP-value
Height at the first visit 77.74 +8.977.71 +7.3977.72 +8.20.9870
Weight at the first visit 9.99 +2.369.77 +1.689.89 +2.070.6307
BMI at first visit 16.51 +2.5716.49 +2.1116.5 +2.360.9666
GenderMale47 (62.67)28 (37.33)75(87.20)< .0001>
 Female0 (0.00)11 (100.00)11 (12.79) 
DiagnosisAdenoid hypertrophy24 (43.64)31 (56.36)55 (63.95)0.0073
 Adenoid hypertrophy+ other disease23 (74.19)  8 (25.81)31 (36.05) 
OSA symptomsNo OSA symptoms5 (29.41)12 (70.59)17 (19.77)0.1265
 Snoring8 (61.54)5 (38.46)13 (15.12) 
 Sleep disturbance/mouth breathing21 (56.76)16 (43.24)37 (43.02) 
 Apnea/Cyanosis12 (66.67)6 (33.33)18 (20.93) 
Grade of tonsilGrade 1 tonsil17 (43.59)22 (56.41)39 (45.35)0.1992
 Grade 2 tonsil22 (62.86)13 (37.14)35 (40.7) 
 Grade 3 tonsil6 (60.00)4 (40.00)10 (11.63) 
 Grade 4 tonsil2 (100.00)0 (0.00)2 (2.33) 
Grade of adenoidGrade 1 adenoid7 (50.00)7 (50.00)14 (16.28)0.4304
 Grade 2 adenoid13 (46.43)15 (53.57)28 (32.56) 
 Grade 3 adenoid27 (61.36)17 (38.64)44 (51.16) 
AsthmaNo asthma42 (54.55)35 (45.45)77 (89.53)1.0000
 Asthma5 (55.56)4 (44.44)9 (10.47) 
SyndromesNo syndrome45 (60.00)30 (40.00)75 (87.21)0.0280
 Down syndrome1 (33.33)2 (66.67)3 (3.49) 
 Other syndromes1 (12.50)2 (66.67)8 (9.3) 
Eye complicationsNo eye complications47 (54.65)39 (45.35)86 (100) 

Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics of all patients in relation to the use of Maxitrol®

BMI: body mass index; OSA: obstructive sleep apnea Table 2 shows the relationship between the baseline characteristics and surgery booking after one year. The results reveal that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) symptoms (p=0.026) and adenoid grade (p=0.040) show a significant relationship with surgery booking after one year. Other baseline characteristics, including height, weight, BMI, gender, diagnosis, tonsil grade, asthma, syndrome, and eye complications, did not show a significant relationship compared to surgery booking after one year (all p>0.05).
Table 2

Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics of all patients in relation to surgery booking after one year

BMI: body mass index; OSA: obstructive sleep apnea

VariablesLevelsNo surgery within 1 year (n=45)  N(%)Booked for surgery (n=41)  N(%)TotalP-value
Height at the first visit 76.84 +8.4978.72 +7.8477.72 +8.20.2921
Weight at the first visit 9.78 +2.1510.02 +2.019.89 +2.070.5843
BMI at first visit 16.83 +2.5416.13 +2.1216.5 +2.360.1751
GenderMale38 (50.67)37 (49.33)75(87.20)0.5259
 Female7 (63.64)4 (36.36)11 (12.79) 
DiagnosisAdenoid hypertrophy30 (54.55)25 (45.45)55 (63.95)0.6557
 Adenoid hypertrophy+ other disease15 (48.39)16 (51.61)31 (36.05) 
OSA symptomsNo OSA symptoms12 (70.59)5 (29.41)17 (19.77)0.0258
 Snoring8 (61.54)5 (38.46)13 (15.12) 
 Sleep disturbance/mouth breathing20 (54.05)17 (45.95)37 (43.02) 
 Apnea/Cyanosis4 (22.22)14 (77.78)18 (20.93) 
Grade of tonsilGrade 1 tonsil19 (48.72)20 (51.28)39 (45.35)0.3978
 Grade 2 tonsil20 (57.14)15 (42.86)35 (40.7) 
 Grade 3 tonsil6 (60.00)4 (40.00)10 (11.63) 
 Grade 4 tonsil0 (0.00)2 (100.00)2 (2.33) 
Grade of adenoidGrade 1 adenoid11 (78.57)3 (21.43)14 (16.28)0.0403
 Grade 2 adenoid16 (57.14)12 (42.86)28 (32.56) 
 Grade 3 adenoid18 (40.91)26 (59.09)44 (51.16) 
AsthmaNo asthma42 (54.55)35 (45.45)77 (89.53)0.2993
 Asthma3 (33.33)6 (66.67)9 (10.47) 
SyndromesNo syndrome38 (50.67)37 (49.33)75 (87.21)0.7182
 Down syndrome2 (66.67)1 (33.33)3 (3.49) 
 Other syndromes5 (62.50)3 (37.50)8 (9.3) 
Eye complications      No eye complications45 (52.33)41 (47.67)86 (100) 

Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics of all patients in relation to surgery booking after one year

BMI: body mass index; OSA: obstructive sleep apnea The relationship between the use of Maxitrol® and booking for surgery was not statistically significant (p=0.26) as Table 3 shows. There was no significant difference in terms of surgery booking with Maxitrol® use. Patients without OSA symptoms were less likely to book a surgery than were those with apnea/cyanosis (odds ratio [OR]=0.133; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.025-0.630). Patients with sleep disturbance/mouth breathing are less likely to book surgery than are those with apnea/cyanosis (OR=0.249; 95% CI=0.069-0.873). Moreover, patients who reported snoring are less likely to book surgery than are those with apnea/cyanosis (OR=0.037-0.873) (Table 4).
Table 3

Outcome of the use of Maxitrol®

Use of Maxitrol®No surgery within 1 yearBooked for surgeryTotalP-value
No Maxitrol23 (58.97)16 (41.03)390.2608
Used Maxitrol22 (46.81)25 (53.19)47 
Total454186 
Table 4

Associated factors with surgery booking in terms of OR based on logistic regression model (modeling the probability of surgery booking)

OSA: obstructive sleep apnea; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval

EffectLevelsOR95% CI
Use of Maxitrol®NoRef. 
Yes1.394(0.549, 3.537)
OSA symptomsApnea / CyanosisRef. 
No Symptom0.133(0.028, 0.63)
Sleep disturbance/mouth breathing0.249(0.069, 0.904)
Snoring0.18(0.037, 0.873)

Associated factors with surgery booking in terms of OR based on logistic regression model (modeling the probability of surgery booking)

OSA: obstructive sleep apnea; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval

Discussion

Intranasal corticosteroids treatment in children with adenoid hypertrophy were first introduced by Demain in 1995 [3]. The mechanism through which intranasal corticosteroids relieve nasal airway obstruction symptoms has not yet been determined. However, it is thought that they decrease adenoid hypertrophy through their lympholytic or anti-inflammatory effects [6]. A study about the spread of topical corticosteroid sprays in the nasal cavity showed that the spread is insufficient [9,10]. On the other hand, topical intranasal steroid in drop form showed more spread in the nasal cavity and reached the nasopharynx faster. It was demonstrated that the medical use of intranasal corticosteroids such as fluticasone propionate [11] or mometasone furoate [12] for the treatment of adenoid hypertrophy showed significant results in older children. Zhang et al., in their meta-analysis, showed a five-fold reduction in adenoid size after treatment with intranasal corticosteroids [13]. In another meta-analysis, Chohan et al. evaluated intranasal mometasone furoate in terms of nasal symptoms, adenoid size, or adenoid/choana ratio, and stated that it was effective [14]. Additionally, three months of treatment for adenoid hypertrophy with intranasal corticosteroids and antihistamines significantly reduced adenoid size [15]. There is no consensus on the duration of treatment and optimal dose of intranasal corticosteroids. In our study, Maxitrol® was prescribed as two drops in each nostril daily for two to six weeks depending on symptoms improvement. Maxitrol® succeeded to improve nasal symptoms (i.e., snoring and nasal discharge); however, it failed to treat adenoid hypertrophy. As a result, surgery was eventually needed in most of our patients. Furthermore, the probability of booking for surgery for our patients who used Maxitrol® was 1.394 times higher than for those who were not using it. While Varricchio et al. demonstrated lower rates of adenoidectomy following intranasal flunisolide treatment [16], we found that the relationship between the use of Maxitrol® and booking for surgery was not statistically significant in our study. We observed that the probability of booking for surgery for those with sleep disturbance and mouth breathing (OSA symptoms) was likely to increase. Topical corticosteroids have fewer side effects than do oral corticosteroids. The local side effects are mainly dry nose, bleeding, crusting, and candidiasis [17]. They are less likely to cause systemic effects on bone metabolism, effects on growth, and the adrenocortical axis [18]. Skoner et al. demonstrated the negative effect of intranasal beclomethasone dipropionate on growth after one year in pediatric patients (aged six to nine years) as it showed significant suppression of growth [19]. On the contrary, other studies have shown no suppression of bone growth in children after one year of treatment with a pediatric dose of mometasone furcate (MF) nasal spray (100 µg daily) or with budesonide (BUD) (200 µg twice daily) [20,21]. Similarly, the use of Maxitrol® in our study had no effect on growth parameters in our patients when they were seen at their follow-up time after one year. The age restriction for the use of intranasal corticosteroids is variable; for fluticasone furoate and mometasone, it is two years and older [22]. Mometasone furoate was found to be the most reliable drug in children older than two years [23,24]. None of the other studies have investigated, as we did, the use of intranasal corticosteroids in children younger than two years. Alhussien et al. suggested that intranasal use of fluticasone furoate, mometasone, and budesonide is safe if they are used at the recommended therapeutic dose after a proper medical evaluation during pregnancy [25]. Such a study can raise the question of whether intranasal steroids are safe during fetal periods and why they might be contraindicated during the first two years of life.

Conclusions

In this small sample, the use of Maxitrol® in the pediatric age group below two years with adenoid hypertrophy was safe and effective in relieving nasal symptoms; however, surgery was needed in most of our patients. Eye complications and suppression of growth were not reported in any of our patients during the follow-up time after one year. Further long-term large randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Maxitrol®.
  24 in total

1.  Absence of growth retardation in children with perennial allergic rhinitis after one year of treatment with mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray.

Authors:  E J Schenkel; D P Skoner; E A Bronsky; S D Miller; D S Pearlman; A Rooklin; J P Rosen; M E Ruff; M L Vandewalker; A Wanderer; C V Damaraju; K B Nolop; B Mesarina-Wicki
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial of topical intranasal mometasone furoate nasal spray in children of adenoidal hypertrophy with otitis media with effusion.

Authors:  Rahul Bhargava; Arunabha Chakravarti
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 1.808

3.  Symptom relief by adenoidectomy and relationship to adenoid and post-nasal airway size.

Authors:  J W Tankel; A D Cheesman
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.469

4.  The role of topical nasal steroids in the treatment of children with otitis media with effusion and/or adenoid hypertrophy.

Authors:  S Cengel; M U Akyol
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 1.675

5.  Frequency of surgery among children who have adenotonsillar hypertrophy and improve after treatment with nasal beclomethasone.

Authors:  Gaetano Criscuoli; Stefania D'Amora; Giuseppe Ripa; Giovanni Cinquegrana; Nicola Mansi; Nicola Impagliazzo; Alfredo Pisacane
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Long-term follow-up of children undergoing topical intranasal steroid therapy for adenoidal hypertrophy.

Authors:  Marco Berlucchi; Luisa Valetti; Giovanni Parrinello; Piero Nicolai
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  Intranasal flunisolide treatment in children with adenoidal hypertrophy.

Authors:  G Ciprandi; A Varricchio; M Capasso; A M Varricchio; A De Lucia; E Ascione; F Avvisati; C Capristo; G L Marseglia; U Barillari
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.219

Review 8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the role of mometasone in adenoid hypertrophy in children.

Authors:  Alisha Chohan; Avtar Lal; Karan Chohan; Arunabha Chakravarti; Sunil Gomber
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 1.675

9.  Safety of nasal budesonide in the long-term treatment of children with perennial rhinitis.

Authors:  C Möller; H Ahlström; K-A Henricson; L-A Malmqvist; A Akerlund; H Hildebrand
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.018

10.  Pediatric adenoidal hypertrophy and nasal airway obstruction: reduction with aqueous nasal beclomethasone.

Authors:  J G Demain; D W Goetz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.