Successful Treatment with Ensartinib After Alectinib-induced Hyperbilirubinemia in ALK-Positive NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Alectinib is approved for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring ALK rearrangements. Although generally well tolerated, alectinib can cause serious or life-threatening side effects. CASE
PRESENTATION: Here, we report a case of a patient with NSCLC with an EML4-ALK fusion and was treated with alectinib but who developed grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia after five months on therapy. Alectinib was discontinued, and an artificial liver support system (ALSS) was used with an impressive decline in bilirubin levels. After two months drug-free, the patient experienced disease progression. Ensartinib was initiated as second-line treatment with a best response of stable disease after three months of therapy with no evidence of hyperbilirubinemia.
CONCLUSION: This is the first report of ensartinib treatment after alectinib-induced hyperbilirubinemia which was successfully relieved by ALSS treatment and targeted drug cessation.

Introduction

ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is identified in 3–7% of advanced NSCLC cases.1 First generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib has been the standard of care for the past 10 years.2 Second-generation ALK inhibitors such as alectinib were developed to be more effective than crizotinib especially in targeting brain metastases. Based on two large randomized clinical trials, ALEX3 and J-ALEX,4 alectinib was approved for the first-line treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC. There are differences in the toxicity profiles between different ALK inhibitors with typically gastrointestinal and hepatic toxicities with ceritinib, visual disorders with crizotinib, edema, myalgias and dysgeusia with alectinib, and respiratory complications with brigatinib.5 These are possibly due to off-target effects inherent to the molecular structure of each ALK TKI.

Alectinib is generally well tolerated, but some more common adverse events (AEs) are observed including anemia, myalgia, and fatigue among others.6 However, the most common of these (all grades) is increased blood bilirubin (36.2%).7 Here we present a case of an advanced stage NSCLC patient with a variant 2 EML4-ALK fusion who developed a severe toxicity of hyperbilirubinemia secondary to alectinib. ALSS was used twice in his treatment with other hepatoprotective therapies, and a therapeutic switch to ensartinib led to stable disease without liver toxicity and with normal bilirubin levels. We present the following case in accordance with the CARE reporting checklist.

Case Presentation

A 56-year-old Chinese male smoker was diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC in December 2019. His chest CT scan (Figure 1A and B) revealed a mass in the right lower lobe and right-side pleural effusion. PET-CT indicated a mass in the right lower hilar region with an elevated standardized uptake value (SUV) (Figure 1C), multiple lymph node enlargement, and bone metastases (Figure 1D). A diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma was made on endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA-EBUS) of lymph nodes (Figure 1E). Lung adenocarcinoma cells were also found in pleural effusion samples (Figure 1F). Next generation sequencing (NGS) of peripheral blood ctDNA indicated EML4-ALK, variant 2 (E20-A20). Alectinib was given orally, at a dose of 600 mg twice daily from January 7, 2020, which resulted in partial response and patient continued to respond after four months of treatment (Figure 2A and B). He was noted to have an increased total bilirubin (TBIL) of 59.2 μmol/L on May 5, 2020 (on alectinib for 119 days) but did not refer to the doctor.

Figure 1

Diagnoses of right lower lung adenocarcinoma, stage IV. (A) CT scan lung on Dec 17, 2019; (B) CT mediastinum on Dec 17, 2019; (C and D) PET-CT scan on Dec 31, 2019; (E) Histopathologic findings of lung adenocarcinoma of mediastinal lymph node from EBUS-TBNA (H&E, 40×). (F) Cytology from pleural effusion. Significant abnormal findings of right lung, lymph node and bone metastases were noted (arrow).

Figure 2

CT scans before and after ensartinib. (A) CT lung captured on May 6, 2020; (B) CT mediastinum on May 6, 2020; (C) CT lung on Aug 5, 2020 (before ensartinib); (D) CT mediastinum on Aug 5, 2020 (before ensartinib); (E) CT on Nov 30, 2020 (after ensartinib); (F) CT on Nov 30h, 2020 (after ensartinib). Significant abnormal findings of right lung were noted (arrow).

On May 29, 2020, the patient presented with jaundice, pruritus and fatigue. His Karnofsky performance status (KPS) rating fell to 60 points. The laboratory result showed TBIL 315.0 μmol/L, DBIL (direct bilirubin) 260.7 μmol/L, and IBIL (indirect bilirubin) 54.3 μmol/L. Serum ALP (alkaline phosphatase) was 374 U/L, total bile acid 179.9 μmol/L, GGT (gamma-glutamyl transferase) 47U/L and aminotransferase levels were AST 34 U/L and ALT 42 U/L. Therefore, a diagnosis of alectinib-induced grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia (>10.0⨰ULN if baseline was normal, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v.5.0) was considered. Alectinib was held due to hepatotoxicity. Of note, he had no known liver metastases at baseline nor at follow-up scans. Assessment for viral hepatitis was unrevealing.

After hepatoprotective treatment comprising ursodeoxycholic acid, glycyrrhizin and glutathione was administered for one week, his bilirubin levels were still worsening, while AST and ALT levels remained similar. Drug-induced liver failure was diagnosed. Although artificial liver support or liver transplantation were both therapeutic choices for liver failure, considering he was a patient with advanced cancer, ALSS was an optimal choice. He received ALSS using a double plasma molecular absorption system (DPMAS) on June 5 and June 8, 2020, for the severe liver dysfunction. The total bilirubin continuously decreased after two courses of ALSS (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Bilirubin levels of this patient.

Alectinib was, therefore, discontinued for more than two months when a chest CT scan on August 5, 2020 revealed enlargement of lung lesions (Figure 2C and D) and overall disease progression. Ensartinib 225 mg once daily was given orally from August 29 as a second-line ALK TKI with initial tumor shrinkage after three months (Figure 2E and F) and stable disease overall by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria version 1.1. Toxicity of second-line ensartinib was grade 1 ALT and AST elevation and grade 1 skin rash, with no abnormality of bilirubin. The timeline of this patient is summarized in Figure 4.

Figure 4

Timeline of patient history.

Discussion

Several ALK TKIs have been developed and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of ALK-positive advanced NSCLC, including crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib. The toxicity profile of different ALK TKIs is different due to their different structure and the ensuing off-target effects. In fact, alectinib is associated with a relatively high incidence of hepatotoxicity, while brigatinib is associated with a unique pulmonary toxicity and lorlatinib exhibits a peculiar neurotoxicity. Alectinib is predominantly metabolized into M4, and M4 is metabolized into M6by CYP3A4.8 Alectinib is not a substrate for transporters, coadministration with transporter inhibitors or inducers are not expected to have relevant implication.

Liver and kidney are the two major organs for the elimination of ALK TKIs. Liver elimination represents the major clearance pathway, with minor contributions from renal elimination. Hepatotoxicity of ALK TKI has been evaluated and compared in a meta-analysis.9 Severe ALK inhibitor-induced hepatotoxicity has previously been reported.10,11 Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can be divided into three main categories based on biochemical injury patterns: hepatocellular, cholestatic, and mixed.12 Most cases of drug-induced structural hepatotoxicity can be either acute or chronic, involving histological features of hepatocellular damage, cholestasis and/or steatosis. Histologic analysis of severe acute hepatitis of a patient receiving alectinib revealed inflammatory infiltrate and ductular proliferation connecting portal tracts and centrilobular areas.11 Hyperbilirubinemia is not a class-specific toxicity and seen specifically with alectinib and so not typical for other ALK TKIs.

Mechanisms of TKI-induced toxicity was studied in human hepatocyte cell lines, indicating mitochondrial toxicity and inhibition of glycolysis might relate to hepatotoxicity of TKI drugs.13 ROS-dependent DNA damage was found to be a possible mechanism of ALK inhibitor-induced hepatotoxicity.14

Adverse drug reactions that led to discontinuation of alectinib due to hyperbilirubinemia was reported as 1.3% in trials. As per the package insert, for grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia, alectinib should be temporarily withheld until recovery to baseline or to less than or equal to 1.5 times ULN (upper limits of normal). The resolution pattern of hepatotoxicity varies greatly.10 In our case, jaundice did not resolve after discontinuation of alectinib for seven days. Although ALSS has not received approval for routine use for the most common causes of hepatic failure, we used it here to improve hepatic function.12 This patient experienced grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia, therefore, permanent discontinuation of alectinib was advised.

We also identified an EML4-ALK variant 2 (EML4-ALK fusion on exon 20) in the patient’s peripheral blood ctDNA by NGS. EML4-ALK variant 2 accounts for about 10% of EML4-ALK variants.15 Different variants may respond largely differently toward ALK TKIs, as variant 3a- or 5a- harboring cells were resistant to ALK inhibitor with >10-fold higher half maximal inhibitory concentration in vitro.16 Clinical data also demonstrated different ALK variants have different clinical response to ALK TKIs.17 However, it is unknown whether the variant type of ALK fusion has an impact on toxicity. Analysis of plasma samples obtained postprogression on alectinib from pooled analysis of two prospective trials revealed that 53% samples harbored 16 distinct ALK mutations,18 which may guide alectinib-resistant treatments. Although this patient developed disease progression, we speculate that this was more likely due to discontinuation of alectinib than resistance to alectinib. For this reason, we did not elect to perform tissue or liquid biopsy sequencing to investigate presence of resistance mutations at later time points.

Previous research has provided evidence of a crucial role for the adaptive immune system in the pathogenesis of DILI.19 HLA-restricted T cell immune responses have been investigated using lymphocytes from patients with DILI.20 We performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) from peripheral blood of this patient. Pathway analysis of SNVs (single nucleotide variants) from WGS of the patient’s peripheral blood indicated enrichment of genes involved in many biological functions, including antigen presentation (, –). No definitive gene variants were discovered to potentially explain alectinib-induced hyperbilirubinemia for this patient.

The subsequent treatment options for intolerance to an ALK inhibitor include switching to another ALK inhibitor or chemotherapy. A previous report described a patient with a crizotinib-induced hepatitis then treated with ceritinib salvage treatment, which indicated switch from one ALK TKI to another one would be a feasible and safe choice.21 Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials have shown that ensartinib is effective for patients whose cancer has progressed on crizotinib as well as second-generation ALK inhibitors. Ensartinib was approved on November 17, 2020 by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) of China for the second-line treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC after progression or intolerance of crizotinib based on the single-arm Phase 2 trial.22 In addition, a recently reported Phase 3 trial, eXalt3, investigated ensartinib compared with crizotinib in the first-line setting and showed a statistically significant longer PFS for ensartinib.23 Furthermore, in patients without measurable brain metastases at baseline, the 12-month relapse rate was much lower for patients given ensartinib compared with crizotinib (HR=0.32; P=0.0001),23 indicating the intracranially prophylactic role of ensartinib. Considering the drug label and accessibility, ensartinib might be a reasonable treatment strategy for patients who are intolerant of alectinib as we showed in this case, with clinical benefit and no recurrence of severe hepatotoxicity.

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia in a patient treated with alectinib, followed by ensartinib. Alectinib-induced hyperbilirubinemia of this patient was successfully managed with ALSS, suggesting that the latter may be an adjunct to drug cessation. Close monitoring of liver function remains a mandatory requirement for patients receiving ALK TKIs regardless of line of therapy and duration of treatment.