| Literature DB >> 34079238 |
Eman R Darwish1,2,3,4, Haitham Kalil1,2,5, Wafa Alqahtani1,2, Sayed M N Moalla4, Nasser M Hosny4, Alaa S Amin6, Heidi B Martin3, Mekki Bayachou1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Adsorption and uptake of heavy metals by polymeric nanoparticles is driven by a variety of physicochemical processes. In this work, we examined heavy metal uptake by synthetic melanin nanoparticles and analyzed physicochemical properties that affect the extent of metal uptake by the nanoparticles.Entities:
Keywords: adsorption; differential sodium content; heavy metals; melanin nanoparticles; metal extraction; one-pot synthesis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34079238 PMCID: PMC8163724 DOI: 10.2147/NSA.S296722
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanotechnol Sci Appl ISSN: 1177-8903
Figure 1Characterization of synthetic melanin nanoparticles by SEM and elemental analysis. (A) The micrograph shows melanin nanoparticles with an average particle size of 190 nm for LSM sample; SEM of HSM (not shown) exhibited similar characteristics. (B) Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed the expected atomic composition of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and sodium.
Figure 2SEM micrographs of melanin nanoparticles showed a general increase in particle size after extraction of metal divalent cations from aqueous solutions. The metal ion symbol on each micrograph indicates the metal ion adsorbed. The estimated particle size after adsorption of the metal ions are as follows: Zn2+ 200 nm, Cd2+ 300 nm, Ni2+ 220 nm, Co2+ 225 nm, Cu2+ 230 nm, and Pb2+ 240 nm.
Figure 3XPS survey spectrum of synthetic melanin nanoparticles after uptake of Zn2+ ions (exposure to 50 ppm starting concentration). Survey spectra taken with sputtering at nominal depths of 0 and 10 nm to monitor zinc ions.
Figure 4Concentration of metal ions after extraction from aqueous solution using LSM melanin (7 mg melanin, 50 ppm starting concentration). Concentrations were determined using ICP. Solid bars show the concentration of metal ions retrieved from the melanin nanoparticles after adsorption (uptake). Striped bars show the concentrations left in the supernatant after metal adsorption. A break in y-axis is introduced because of the difference in magnitudes between concentrations of uptake versus the concentrations left in the supernatant. The scale before and after the y-axis break is adjusted to reflect concentration differences.
Metal Ion Percentages of the Overall Uptake by Synthetic Melanin Using ICP Measurements
| Metal Ion | % Metal Amount Uptake in Melanin Nanoparticles | % Metal Amount Left in Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Zn2+ | 89.9 | 7.07 |
| Cd2+ | 85.8 | 13.3 |
| Ni2+ | 83.1 | 16.4 |
| Co2+ | 82.0 | 16.6 |
| Cu2+ | 80.2 | 16.6 |
| Pb2+ | 76.0 | 20.7 |
Notes: Percentages are based on a 30-minute ion capture from 50 ppm starting concentrations using 7 mg synthetic melanin.
Adsorption Capacities of Metal Ions in Millimole Ion per Gram of Adsorbent for Synthetic Melanin in This Work and for Other Adsorbents from Literature
| Adsorbent | Adsorption Capacities (mmol/g) | Extraction/Contact Time | References | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zn2+ | Cd2+ | Ni2+ | Co2+ | Cu2+ | Pb2+ | |||
| Granular Activated Carbona | – | 0.01 | – | – | 0.04 | 0.03 | 24 hours | [ |
| Powdered Activated Carbona | – | 0.01 | – | – | 0.05 | 0.12 | 24 hours | [ |
| Zeolite | – | 0.20 | – | – | 0.20 | 0.48 | 24 hours | [ |
| Activated Carbon Fibers | – | – | 0.152 | 0.174 | 0.147 | 24 hours | [ | |
| Duolite GT-73 Resina | 0.85 | 0.94 | 0.97 | – | 0.97 | 0.59 | 24 hours | [ |
| Amberlite 200 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 1.5 | – | 1.4 | 1.7 | 24 hours | [ |
| Melanin nanoparticlesb | 1.47 | 0.82 | 1.56 | 1.49 | 1.35 | 0.40b | 30 minutesb | This work |
Notes: aInitial concentrations in these reports were in the millimolar range and thus are higher than concentrations used in this work. Our numbers would be higher for similar concentrations; bExtraction/contact time in this work is not equilibrium time and the capacities reported are lower limit capacities in this case.
Figure 5Plot of adsorption capacity as a function of solution-phase electronegativity of the various divalent metal ions. Adsorption capacity data is calculated from ICP measurements. Electronegativities that reflect metal ions in solution are different from the Pauling electronegativities data from Li et al.61 Dashed blue curve is not from a model and is added to show the general trend only.
Figure 6Adsorption capacities over a 30-min extraction time in milligrams of Zn adsorbed per gram of melanin adsorbent for LSM (blue bar) and HSM (orange bar) melanin variants. Error bars on the graph represent the 95% confidence interval based on 3 replicates and a standard deviation of 0.2 mg/g derived from ICP measurements.
Atomic Ratios from XPS with Depth Profiling at 0 and 10 nm from the Surface of the Melanin Nanoparticles
| O/C | N/C | Na/C | Zn/C | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSM melanin nanoparticles | @ 0.0 nm | 0.303 | 0.061 | 0.041 | 0.012 |
| @ 10.0 nm | 0.130 | 0.066 | 0.065 | 0.018 | |
| HSM melanin nanoparticles | @ 0.0 nm | 0.364 | 0.086 | 0.055 | 0.003 |
| @ 10.0 nm | 0.190 | 0.099 | 0.082 | 0.004 |
Notes: All ratios mentioned are for melanin samples after Zn adsorption.