| Literature DB >> 34078780 |
Anushka Khasnobish1, Lena Takayasu2, Ken-Ichi Watanabe3, Tien Thi Thuy Nguyen4, Kensuke Arakawa1, Osamu Hotta5, Kensuke Joh6, Akiyo Nakano7, Shuhei Hosomi8, Masahira Hattori9, Wataru Suda9, Hidetoshi Morita1.
Abstract
IgA nephropathy is one of the leading causes of chronic kidney disease in Japan. Since the origin and mechanisms by which IgA nephropathy develops currently remain unclear, a confirmed disease diagnosis is currently only possible by highly invasive renal biopsy. With the background of the salivary microbiome as a rich source of biomarkers for systemic diseases, we herein primarily aimed to investigate the salivary microbiome as a tool for the non-invasive diagnosis of IgA nephropathy. In a comparison of salivary microbiome profiles using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, significant differences were observed in microbial diversity and richness between IgA nephropathy patients and healthy controls. Furthermore, recent studies reported that patients with IgA nephropathy are more likely to develop inflammatory bowel diseases and that chronic inflammation of the tonsils triggered the recurrence of IgA nephropathy. Therefore, we compared the salivary microbiome of IgA nephropathy patients with chronic tonsillitis and ulcerative colitis patients. By combining the genera selected by the random forest algorithm, we were able to distinguish IgA nephropathy from healthy controls with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90, from the ulcerative colitis group with AUC of 0.88, and from the chronic tonsillitis group with AUC of 0.70. Additionally, the genus Neisseria was common among the selected genera that facilitated the separation of the IgA nephropathy group from healthy controls and the chronic tonsillitis group. The present results indicate the potential of the salivary microbiome as a biomarker for the non-invasive diagnosis of IgA nephropathy.Entities:
Keywords: IgA nephropathy; kidney disease; oral microbiota; random forest algorithm; salivary microbiome
Year: 2021 PMID: 34078780 PMCID: PMC8209455 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME21006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.912
Subject demographics in four different groups—IgAN, CT, UC, and HC.
| Demographics | IgAN | CT | UC | HC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years, median (IQR) | 39 (20.5) | 34.5 (14.5) | 44.5 (7.75) | 37.5 (8) |
| Male | 20 | 13 | 11 | 36 |
| Female | 23 | 7 | 11 | 14 |
Median age in terms of years is shown for each group along with IQR in parentheses. Small IQR values represent data points that are spread closer to the median. IgAN, Immunoglobulin A nephropathy; CT, chronic tonsillitis; UC, ulcerative colitis; HC, healthy control; IQR, interquartile range.
Fig. 1.Alpha and beta diversities in IgAN, CT, UC, and HC subjects. Samples from 43 IgAN (blue), 20 CT (red), 22 UC (green), and 50 HC (purple) subjects are shown. (A) Observed and Chao1-estimated OTU numbers, and the Shannon index of the salivary microbiome from the four groups. * P<0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P<0.001 based on the Wilcoxon test with the Benjamin-Hochberg correction. (B) Weighted UniFrac–PCoA and (C) unweighted UniFrac–PCoA of the salivary microbiome from the four groups. OTU, operational taxonomic unit; PCoA, principal coordinate analysis; IgAN, immunoglobulin A nephropathy; CT, chronic tonsillitis; UC, ulcerative colitis; HC, healthy controls.
Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) in salivary microbiome samples among four groups—IgAN, CT, UC, and HC.
| Category | No. of Subjects | Weighted UniFrac | Unweighted UniFrac | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | Adjusted | R2 | Adjusted | |||
| CT vs HC | CT: 20 | 0.06 | 0.06 | |||
| IgAN vs CT | IgAN: 43 | 0.02 | 0.217 | 0.03 | ||
| IgAN vs HC | IgAN: 43 | 0.07 | 0.03 | |||
| CT vs UC | CT: 20 | 0.04 | 0.179 | 0.04 | ||
| UC vs HC | UC: 22 | 0.04 | 0.05 | |||
| IgAN vs UC | IgAN: 43 | 0.06 | 0.04 | |||
P values were adjusted for multiple testing by the Benjamin-Hochberg method. P values <0.05 are in bold.
Fig. 2.Common differential features between IgAN and three other groups (CT, UC, and HC) from a LefSe analysis. With a threshold LDA score >2, differentially abundant taxa were identified between the IgAN vs CT, IgAN vs UC, and IgAN vs HC groups. The four common taxa at the OTU level are shown. Individual red bars represent the relative abundance of the taxa in a sample. LefSe, Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size; IgAN, immunoglobulin A nephropathy; CT, chronic tonsillitis; UC, ulcerative colitis; HC, healthy controls.
Mean area under curve for salivary microbiome samples among IgAN, CT, UC, and HC groups.
| Category | cvAUC | |
|---|---|---|
| OTU Level | Genus Level | |
| IgAN vs HC | 0.88 | 0.90 |
| IgAN vs CT | 0.62 | 0.707 |
| IgAN vs UC | 0.88 | 0.851 |
The mean AUCs (cvAUC) of the 10-fold cross validation process repeated 20 times using the best RF model in the AUC-RF package are shown here. cvAUC, mean area under curve from 20 repetitive 10-fold cross validations of the random forest model; RF, Random Forest.
Fig. 3.Random Forest (RF) analysis of the salivary microbiota of four groups using the AUC-RF package at the OTU level. Best RF models (comparisons based on a combination of the best mean area under the curve [AUC] value) was obtained at the (a) genus and (b) OTU levels. The selected features of the best RF models for (c) IgAN-HC, (d) IgAN-CT, and (e) IgAN-UC comparisons are shown. Kopt=optimal number of features to distinguish between two groups under comparison; IgAN, immunoglobulin A nephropathy; CT, chronic tonsillitis; UC, ulcerative colitis; HC, healthy controls.