Literature DB >> 3407866

Successful difficult intubation. Use of the gum elastic bougie.

J F Kidd1, A Dyson, I P Latto.   

Abstract

The reliability of two signs of tracheal placement of a gum elastic bougie was studied. These signs were clicks (produced as the tip of the bougie runs over the tracheal cartilages) and hold up of the bougie as it is advanced (when the tip reaches the small bronchi). Ninety-eight simulated and two genuine Grade 3 difficult intubations were attempted with the aid of a gum elastic bougie. Seventy-eight tracheal and 22 oesophageal placements of the bougie resulted. No clicks or hold up occurred with the bougie in the oesophagus. Clicks were recorded in 89.7% of tracheal placements of the bougie. Hold up at between 24-40 cm occurred in all tracheal placements. We conclude that these signs are reliable and that they should be taught as part of any difficult intubation drill in which the gum elastic bougie is used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3407866     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb06625.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Methods of airway management in prehospital emergency medicine].

Authors:  W Keul; M Bernhard; A Völkl; R Gust; A Gries
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Failed intubation in the parturient.

Authors:  M E Tunstall
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 3.  The role of tracheal tube introducers and stylets in current airway management.

Authors:  Sina Grape; Patrick Schoettker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube and Stylet on First-Attempt Intubation Success Among Patients With Difficult Airways Undergoing Emergency Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Brian E Driver; Matthew E Prekker; Lauren R Klein; Robert F Reardon; James R Miner; Erik T Fagerstrom; Mitchell R Cleghorn; John W McGill; Jon B Cole
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Benefits of using an endotracheal tube introducer as an adjunct to a Macintosh laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation performed by inexperienced doctors during mechanical CPR: A randomized prospective crossover study.

Authors:  Hüseyin Cahit Halhalli; Asım Enes Özbek; Emrah Çelİk; Yavuz Yİğİt; Serkan Yilmaz; Müge Çardak
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2019

6.  Comparison of success of tracheal intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope-assisted Bonfils fiberscope and Truview video laryngoscope in simulated difficult airway.

Authors:  Bangaru Vivek; R Sripriya; Gayatri Mishra; M Ravishankar; S Parthasarathy
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

7.  A Comparative Evaluation of Hemodynamic Response and Ease of Intubation using Airtraq and McCoy Laryngoscope.

Authors:  Alok Kumar Sahoo; Kalpana Majhi; Indraprava Mandal
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

Review 8.  Advancing emergency airway management practice and research.

Authors:  Tadahiro Goto; Yukari Goto; Yusuke Hagiwara; Hiroshi Okamoto; Hiroko Watase; Kohei Hasegawa
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2019-05-21

9.  Comparison of the new flexible tip bougie catheter and standard bougie stylet for tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists in different difficult airway scenarios: a randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Kurt Ruetzler; Jacek Smereka; Cristian Abelairas-Gomez; Michael Frass; Marek Dabrowski; Szymon Bialka; Hanna Misiolek; Tadeusz Plusa; Oliver Robak; Olga Aniolek; Jerzy Robert Ladny; Damian Gorczyca; Sanchit Ahuja; Lukasz Szarpak
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults.

Authors:  C Frerk; V S Mitchell; A F McNarry; C Mendonca; R Bhagrath; A Patel; E P O'Sullivan; N M Woodall; I Ahmad
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 9.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.