Literature DB >> 3407825

Compliance with OSHA record-keeping requirements.

P J Seligman1, W K Sieber, D H Pedersen, D S Sundin, T M Frazier.   

Abstract

The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 requires employers to maintain records of workplace injuries and illnesses. To assess compliance with the law, data from the National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) were examined. Of the 4,185 companies with 11 or more employees, 75 per cent maintained OSHA Form 200 designed for recording illnesses and injuries. The number of employees and the presence of a union were positive determinants in the record maintenance. Of companies with 500 or more employees, 95 per cent kept records compared with 60 per cent of companies with between 11 and 99 employees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3407825      PMCID: PMC1349399          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.78.9.1218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  1 in total

1.  Fatal occupational injuries in US industries, 1984: comparison of two national surveillance systems.

Authors:  N Stout-Wiegand
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 9.308

  1 in total
  9 in total

1.  An impact evaluation of a federal mine safety training regulation on injury rates among US stone, sand, and gravel mine workers: an interrupted time-series analysis.

Authors:  Celeste Monforton; Richard Windsor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The impact of OSHA recordkeeping regulation changes on occupational injury and illness trends in the US: a time-series analysis.

Authors:  Lee S Friedman; Linda Forst
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Fatal occupational injuries in US industries, 1984: comparison of two national surveillance systems.

Authors:  N Stout-Wiegand
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Effectiveness of source documents for identifying fatal occupational injuries: a synthesis of studies.

Authors:  N Stout; C Bell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Comparison of data sources for the surveillance of work injury.

Authors:  Cameron A Mustard; Andrea Chambers; Christopher McLeod; Amber Bielecky; Peter M Smith
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Injury classification agreement in linked Bureau of Labor Statistics and Workers' Compensation data.

Authors:  Sara E Wuellner; David K Bonauto
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Exploring the relationship between employer recordkeeping and underreporting in the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses.

Authors:  Sara E Wuellner; David K Bonauto
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  Employer reasons for failing to report eligible workers' compensation claims in the BLS survey of occupational injuries and illnesses.

Authors:  Christina L Rappin; Sara E Wuellner; David K Bonauto
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  Unreported workers' compensation claims to the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses: Establishment factors.

Authors:  Sara E Wuellner; Darrin A Adams; David K Bonauto
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.214

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.