Literature DB >> 3407812

State laws and the practice of lay midwifery.

I H Butter1, B J Kay.   

Abstract

A national survey was conducted to assess the current status and characteristics of state legislation regulating the practice of lay midwives. As of July 1987, 10 states have prohibitory laws, five states have grandmother clauses authorizing practicing midwives under repealed statutes, five states have enabling laws which are not used, and 10 states explicitly permit lay midwives to practice. In the 21 remaining states, the legal status of midwives is unclear. Much of the enabling legislation restricts midwifery practice often resulting in situations similar to those in states with prohibitory laws. Given the growth of an extensive grassroots movement of lay midwives committed to quality of care, this outcome suggests that 21 states with no legislation may provide better opportunities for midwifery practice than states with enabling laws.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3407812      PMCID: PMC1349386          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.78.9.1161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  6 in total

1.  The contest for control: regulating new and expanding health occupations.

Authors:  R G DeVries
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Obstacles to the practice of licensed lay midwifery.

Authors:  D A Sullivan; R Weitz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  The valley of the shadow of birth.

Authors:  A Yankauer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Midwifery laws in the United States.

Authors:  L J Throne; L P Hanson
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  1981 Fall-Winter

5.  Legislation and nurse-midwifery practice in the USA.

Authors:  S D Cohn; N Cuddihy; N Kraus; S A Tom
Journal:  J Nurse Midwifery       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr

6.  Women's health and social change: the case of lay midwives.

Authors:  B J Kay; I H Butter; D Chang; K Houlihan
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.663

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  The transformation of American midwifery: 1975 to 1988.

Authors:  E R Declercq
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Opportunities for lay midwifery practice.

Authors:  P M Starzyk
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Professional midwifery.

Authors:  S J Myers; J Myers-Ciecko
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The trials of Hanna Porn: the campaign to abolish midwifery in Massachusetts.

Authors:  E R Declercq
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Midwifery care, social and medical risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA.

Authors:  M F MacDorman; G K Singh
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.710

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.