Literature DB >> 34077865

A review of risk prediction models in cardiovascular disease: conventional approach vs. artificial intelligent approach.

Aizatul Shafiqah Mohd Faizal1, T Malathi Thevarajah2, Sook Mei Khor3, Siow-Wee Chang4.   

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide and is a global health issue. Traditionally, statistical models are used commonly in the risk prediction and assessment of CVD. However, the adoption of artificial intelligent (AI) approach is rapidly taking hold in the current era of technology to evaluate patient risks and predict the outcome of CVD. In this review, we outline various conventional risk scores and prediction models and do a comparison with the AI approach. The strengths and limitations of both conventional and AI approaches are discussed. Besides that, biomarker discovery related to CVD are also elucidated as the biomarkers can be used in the risk stratification as well as early detection of the disease. Moreover, problems and challenges involved in current CVD studies are explored. Lastly, future prospects of CVD risk prediction and assessment in the multi-modality of big data integrative approaches are proposed.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Cardiovascular diseases; Deep learning; Machine learning; Risk prediction

Year:  2021        PMID: 34077865     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  2 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Diabetic Retinopathy via Atherosclerotic Pathway in COVID-19/Non-COVID-19 Frameworks Using Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Smiksha Munjral; Mahesh Maindarkar; Puneet Ahluwalia; Anudeep Puvvula; Ankush Jamthikar; Tanay Jujaray; Neha Suri; Sudip Paul; Rajesh Pathak; Luca Saba; Renoh Johnson Chalakkal; Suneet Gupta; Gavino Faa; Inder M Singh; Paramjit S Chadha; Monika Turk; Amer M Johri; Narendra N Khanna; Klaudija Viskovic; Sophie Mavrogeni; John R Laird; Gyan Pareek; Martin Miner; David W Sobel; Antonella Balestrieri; Petros P Sfikakis; George Tsoulfas; Athanasios Protogerou; Durga Prasanna Misra; Vikas Agarwal; George D Kitas; Raghu Kolluri; Jagjit Teji; Mustafa Al-Maini; Surinder K Dhanjil; Meyypan Sockalingam; Ajit Saxena; Aditya Sharma; Vijay Rathore; Mostafa Fatemi; Azra Alizad; Vijay Viswanathan; Padukode R Krishnan; Tomaz Omerzu; Subbaram Naidu; Andrew Nicolaides; Mostafa M Fouda; Jasjit S Suri
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-14

2.  Machine learning techniques for arrhythmic risk stratification: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Cheuk To Chung; George Bazoukis; Sharen Lee; Ying Liu; Tong Liu; Konstantinos P Letsas; Antonis A Armoundas; Gary Tse
Journal:  Int J Arrhythmia       Date:  2022-04-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.