Literature DB >> 34077708

Interpretable deep learning uncovers cellular properties in label-free live cell images that are predictive of highly metastatic melanoma.

Assaf Zaritsky1, Andrew R Jamieson2, Erik S Welf2, Andres Nevarez3, Justin Cillay2, Ugur Eskiocak4, Brandi L Cantarel2, Gaudenz Danuser5.   

Abstract

Deep learning has emerged as the technique of choice for identifying hidden patterns in cell imaging data but is often criticized as "black box." Here, we employ a generative neural network in combination with supervised machine learning to classify patient-derived melanoma xenografts as "efficient" or "inefficient" metastatic, validate predictions regarding melanoma cell lines with unknown metastatic efficiency in mouse xenografts, and use the network to generate in silico cell images that amplify the critical predictive cell properties. These exaggerated images unveiled pseudopodial extensions and increased light scattering as hallmark properties of metastatic cells. We validated this interpretation using live cells spontaneously transitioning between states indicative of low and high metastatic efficiency. This study illustrates how the application of artificial intelligence can support the identification of cellular properties that are predictive of complex phenotypes and integrated cell functions but are too subtle to be identified in the raw imagery by a human expert. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  interpretable deep learning; live cell imaging; melanoma metastasis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34077708      PMCID: PMC8353662          DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2021.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Syst        ISSN: 2405-4712            Impact factor:   11.091


  74 in total

1.  NRAS mutation status is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  John A Jakob; Roland L Bassett; Chaan S Ng; Jonathan L Curry; Richard W Joseph; Gladys C Alvarado; Michelle L Rohlfs; Jessie Richard; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Kevin B Kim; Alexander J Lazar; Patrick Hwu; Michael A Davies
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Microscopy-Based High-Content Screening.

Authors:  Michael Boutros; Florian Heigwer; Christina Laufer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Time series modeling of live-cell shape dynamics for image-based phenotypic profiling.

Authors:  Simon Gordonov; Mun Kyung Hwang; Alan Wells; Frank B Gertler; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Mark Bathe
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Content-aware image restoration: pushing the limits of fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Martin Weigert; Uwe Schmidt; Tobias Boothe; Andreas Müller; Alexandr Dibrov; Akanksha Jain; Benjamin Wilhelm; Deborah Schmidt; Coleman Broaddus; Siân Culley; Mauricio Rocha-Martins; Fabián Segovia-Miranda; Caren Norden; Ricardo Henriques; Marino Zerial; Michele Solimena; Jochen Rink; Pavel Tomancak; Loic Royer; Florian Jug; Eugene W Myers
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Enhanced Dendritic Actin Network Formation in Extended Lamellipodia Drives Proliferation in Growth-Challenged Rac1P29S Melanoma Cells.

Authors:  Ashwathi S Mohan; Kevin M Dean; Tadamoto Isogai; Stacy Y Kasitinon; Vasanth S Murali; Philippe Roudot; Alex Groisman; Dana K Reed; Erik S Welf; Sangyoon J Han; Jungsik Noh; Gaudenz Danuser
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 12.270

6.  Next-generation characterization of the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia.

Authors:  Mahmoud Ghandi; Franklin W Huang; Judit Jané-Valbuena; Gregory V Kryukov; Christopher C Lo; E Robert McDonald; Jordi Barretina; Ellen T Gelfand; Craig M Bielski; Haoxin Li; Kevin Hu; Alexander Y Andreev-Drakhlin; Jaegil Kim; Julian M Hess; Brian J Haas; François Aguet; Barbara A Weir; Michael V Rothberg; Brenton R Paolella; Michael S Lawrence; Rehan Akbani; Yiling Lu; Hong L Tiv; Prafulla C Gokhale; Antoine de Weck; Ali Amin Mansour; Coyin Oh; Juliann Shih; Kevin Hadi; Yanay Rosen; Jonathan Bistline; Kavitha Venkatesan; Anupama Reddy; Dmitriy Sonkin; Manway Liu; Joseph Lehar; Joshua M Korn; Dale A Porter; Michael D Jones; Javad Golji; Giordano Caponigro; Jordan E Taylor; Caitlin M Dunning; Amanda L Creech; Allison C Warren; James M McFarland; Mahdi Zamanighomi; Audrey Kauffmann; Nicolas Stransky; Marcin Imielinski; Yosef E Maruvka; Andrew D Cherniack; Aviad Tsherniak; Francisca Vazquez; Jacob D Jaffe; Andrew A Lane; David M Weinstock; Cory M Johannessen; Michael P Morrissey; Frank Stegmeier; Robert Schlegel; William C Hahn; Gad Getz; Gordon B Mills; Jesse S Boehm; Todd R Golub; Levi A Garraway; William R Sellers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A deep learning architecture for image representation, visual interpretability and automated basal-cell carcinoma cancer detection.

Authors:  Angel Alfonso Cruz-Roa; John Edison Arevalo Ovalle; Anant Madabhushi; Fabio Augusto González Osorio
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2013

Review 8.  The stressful tumour environment drives plasticity of cell migration programmes, contributing to metastasis.

Authors:  Savvas Nikolaou; Laura M Machesky
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 7.996

9.  L1CAM defines the regenerative origin of metastasis-initiating cells in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Harihar Basnet; Yasemin Kaygusuz; Ashley M Laughney; Karuna Ganesh; Lan He; Roshan Sharma; Kevin P O'Rourke; Vincent P Reuter; Yun-Han Huang; Mesruh Turkekul; Ekrem Emrah Er; Ignas Masilionis; Katia Manova-Todorova; Martin R Weiser; Leonard B Saltz; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Richard Koche; Scott W Lowe; Dana Pe'er; Jinru Shia; Joan Massagué
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2020-01-13

10.  TGF-β-Induced Transcription Sustains Amoeboid Melanoma Migration and Dissemination.

Authors:  Gaia Cantelli; Jose L Orgaz; Irene Rodriguez-Hernandez; Panagiotis Karagiannis; Oscar Maiques; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Frank O Nestle; Rosa M Marti; Sophia N Karagiannis; Victoria Sanz-Moreno
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Reconstructing data-driven governing equations for cell phenotypic transitions: integration of data science and systems biology.

Authors:  Jianhua Xing
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 2.959

2.  In vivo 3D profiling of site-specific human cancer cell morphotypes in zebrafish.

Authors:  Dagan Segal; Hanieh Mazloom-Farsibaf; Bo-Jui Chang; Philippe Roudot; Divya Rajendran; Stephan Daetwyler; Reto Fiolka; Mikako Warren; James F Amatruda; Gaudenz Danuser
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 8.077

Review 3.  Emerging machine learning approaches to phenotyping cellular motility and morphodynamics.

Authors:  Hee June Choi; Chuangqi Wang; Xiang Pan; Junbong Jang; Mengzhi Cao; Joseph A Brazzo; Yongho Bae; Kwonmoo Lee
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.959

4.  DynaMorph: self-supervised learning of morphodynamic states of live cells.

Authors:  Zhenqin Wu; Bryant B Chhun; Galina Popova; Syuan-Ming Guo; Chang N Kim; Li-Hao Yeh; Tomasz Nowakowski; James Zou; Shalin B Mehta
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Unsupervised discovery of dynamic cell phenotypic states from transmitted light movies.

Authors:  Phuc Nguyen; Sylvia Chien; Jin Dai; Raymond J Monnat; Pamela S Becker; Hao Yuan Kueh
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  SCHOOL: Software for Clinical Health in Oncology for Omics Laboratories.

Authors:  Chelsea K Raulerson; Erika C Villa; Jeremy A Mathews; Benjamin Wakeland; Yan Xu; Jeffrey Gagan; Brandi L Cantarel
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2022-01-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.