Ananya Malhotra1, Bernard Rachet1, Audrey Bonaventure2, Stephen P Pereira3, Laura M Woods1. 1. Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. 2. Epidemiology of Childhood and Adolescent Cancers Team, CRESS, Université de Paris-INSERM, Villejuif, France. 3. UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer (PC) represents a substantial public health burden. Pancreatic cancer patients have very low survival due to the difficulty of identifying cancers early when the tumour is localised to the site of origin and treatable. Recent progress has been made in identifying biomarkers for PC in the blood and urine, but these cannot be used for population-based screening as this would be prohibitively expensive and potentially harmful. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study using prospectively-collected electronic health records from primary care individually-linked to cancer registrations. Our cases were comprised of 1,139 patients, aged 15-99 years, diagnosed with pancreatic cancer between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2009. Each case was age-, sex- and diagnosis time-matched to four non-pancreatic (cancer patient) controls. Disease and prescription codes for the 24 months prior to diagnosis were used to identify 57 individual symptoms. Using a machine learning approach, we trained a logistic regression model on 75% of the data to predict patients who later developed PC and tested the model's performance on the remaining 25%. RESULTS: We were able to identify 41.3% of patients < = 60 years at 'high risk' of developing pancreatic cancer up to 20 months prior to diagnosis with 72.5% sensitivity, 59% specificity and, 66% AUC. 43.2% of patients >60 years were similarly identified at 17 months, with 65% sensitivity, 57% specificity and, 61% AUC. We estimate that combining our algorithm with currently available biomarker tests could result in 30 older and 400 younger patients per cancer being identified as 'potential patients', and the earlier diagnosis of around 60% of tumours. CONCLUSION: After further work this approach could be applied in the primary care setting and has the potential to be used alongside a non-invasive biomarker test to increase earlier diagnosis. This would result in a greater number of patients surviving this devastating disease.
BACKGROUND:Pancreatic cancer (PC) represents a substantial public health burden. Pancreatic cancerpatients have very low survival due to the difficulty of identifying cancers early when the tumour is localised to the site of origin and treatable. Recent progress has been made in identifying biomarkers for PC in the blood and urine, but these cannot be used for population-based screening as this would be prohibitively expensive and potentially harmful. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study using prospectively-collected electronic health records from primary care individually-linked to cancer registrations. Our cases were comprised of 1,139 patients, aged 15-99 years, diagnosed with pancreatic cancer between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2009. Each case was age-, sex- and diagnosis time-matched to four non-pancreatic (cancerpatient) controls. Disease and prescription codes for the 24 months prior to diagnosis were used to identify 57 individual symptoms. Using a machine learning approach, we trained a logistic regression model on 75% of the data to predict patients who later developed PC and tested the model's performance on the remaining 25%. RESULTS: We were able to identify 41.3% of patients < = 60 years at 'high risk' of developing pancreatic cancer up to 20 months prior to diagnosis with 72.5% sensitivity, 59% specificity and, 66% AUC. 43.2% of patients >60 years were similarly identified at 17 months, with 65% sensitivity, 57% specificity and, 61% AUC. We estimate that combining our algorithm with currently available biomarker tests could result in 30 older and 400 younger patients per cancer being identified as 'potential patients', and the earlier diagnosis of around 60% of tumours. CONCLUSION: After further work this approach could be applied in the primary care setting and has the potential to be used alongside a non-invasive biomarker test to increase earlier diagnosis. This would result in a greater number of patients surviving this devastating disease.
Authors: Robert J Huang; Nicole Sung-Eun Kwon; Yutaka Tomizawa; Alyssa Y Choi; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Joo Ha Hwang Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2022-06
Authors: Dory Kovacs; Delfina R Msanga; Stephen E Mshana; Muhammad Bilal; Katarina Oravcova; Louise Matthews Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Barbara J Kenner; Natalie D Abrams; Suresh T Chari; Bruce F Field; Ann E Goldberg; William A Hoos; David S Klimstra; Laura J Rothschild; Sudhir Srivastava; Matthew R Young; Vay Liang W Go Journal: Pancreas Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 3.243
Authors: Agnieszka Lemanska; Claire A Price; Nathan Jeffreys; Rachel Byford; Hajira Dambha-Miller; Xuejuan Fan; William Hinton; Sophie Otter; Rebecca Rice; Ali Stunt; Martin B Whyte; Sara Faithfull; Simon de Lusignan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-10-05 Impact factor: 3.752