In the present study, we report the photochemical transformation of pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazolone substrates that reach an excited state upon irradiation with visible light to initiate the homolytic C-N bond cleavage process that yields the corresponding N1-substituted pyrazoles. Moreover, chemoselective heterolytic C-N bond cleavage is possible in the pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazole core in the presence of bromomalonate.
In the present study, we report the photochemical transformation of pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazolone substrates that reach an excited state upon irradiation with visible light to initiate the homolytic C-N bond cleavage process that yields the corresponding N1-substituted pyrazoles. Moreover, chemoselective heterolytic C-N bond cleavage is possible in the pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazole core in the presence of bromomalonate.
For organic substrates that
do not absorb visible light, it is difficult to use direct energy
transfer applying visible light to achieve transformation.[1] In most cases, due to the poor visible light
absorption of the reaction substrates, it is necessary to use photosensitizers
to initiate the transformations.[2] In the
past decade, numerous efficient photocatalysts, including iridium,
ruthenium, nickel, and copper complexes,[3] as well as various organic dyes,[4] have
been investigated for visible light induced organic transformations
to form carbon–carbon and carbon-heteroatom bonds under very
mild reaction conditions. However, the high cost and sometimes complicated
preparation of these photocatalysts limit their industrial application,
especially for large-scale syntheses.[5] A
novel strategy for radical generation from catalytic visible-light-absorbing
dithiocarbamates was recently presented by Melchiorre.[6] The development of visible light-induced organic reactions
using photoactive substrates without external photosensitizers or
photocatalysts is considered a promising research direction, thus
offering a cost-effective and more environmentally friendly approach
to organic synthesis.[7] Our group has explored
the potential of some azomethine imines as 1,3-dipoles in [3 + 2]-annulation
reactions.[8] Recently, we have developed
a visible-light-induced aerobic oxidation of N1-substituted pyrazolidin-3-ones
to afford the corresponding azomethine imines, which can be further
reacted in situ with ynones under copper-catalyzed [3 + 2] cycloaddition
conditions to give the corresponding pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazoles.[9]N,N-Bicyclic pyrazolidin-3-ones, that is, pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazol-1-one derivatives exhibit pronounced bioactivity
and have attracted much attention in drug development.[10] Among them, pyrazole derivatives have been given
special consideration in cancer therapy.[11] Stoichiometric oxidation-ring opening (Br2, CAN, O2/Cu2+) of the corresponding pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazoles in the presence of water as a nucleophile (Scheme a) was previously
explored by us and others and leads to N1-substituted pyrazoles.[12] Since pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazoles
absorb in the visible frequency range (up to 420 nm), we envisioned
that visible-light induced transformations of the pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazole core could provide a mild and economical route
to valuable N1-substituted pyrazole derivatives, as shown in Scheme b.
Scheme 1
Ring Scission of
Pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazoles
To investigate the feasibility of the proposed strategy, we chose 1a (R1 = Me, R2 = 4-Cl-C6H4) with the absorption maxima at 360 nm (εmax = 8400 M–1 cm–1, λem = 535 with Θf = 0.11)[13] as a model substrate for visible-light-induced C–N
bond cleavage in the pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazole core.
Surprisingly, irradiation of 1a with 400 nm 3 W LEDs
for 24 h in DCM at 25 °C led to the formation of the corresponding
aldehyde 2a in 78% yield. Careful examination of different
solvents (THF, EtOAc, MeCN, acetone, MeOH, and DMF) revealed that
DCM performed best in this protocol. Moreover, a control experiment
with longer wavelengths (450 nm LEDs) slowed the conversion. The reaction
was additionally tested in dichloroethane at 50 °C for 12 and
24 h, resulting in lower yields of 2a with notable side
reactions (for details, see Table SI1).
Next, various substituted pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazoles 1 were investigated to evaluate the generality of the transformation.
Here, C1 phenyl-, heteroaryl-, and alkyl-substituted substrates afforded
the corresponding aldehydes 2a–g in
moderate to good yields (Scheme ). When vinyl-derived substituents were introduced
onto the C1 position of the pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazole
scaffold, the ring expansion products 3 were formed,
together with the formation of products 2 (Scheme , examples 3h and 3i). The formation of ring-expansion products 3 commenced via C1–N8 homolytic bond cleavage
followed by radical 7-endo-trig cyclization.[13]
Scheme 2
C1–N8 and C5–N4 Bond Cleavage of Pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazoles
Hydrogens are omitted for clarity.
1 (0.5 mmol),
DCM (2.5 mL), LED400nm, 25 °C, under N2 for 24–48 h.
C1–N8 and C5–N4 Bond Cleavage of Pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazoles
Hydrogens are omitted for clarity.1 (0.5 mmol),
DCM (2.5 mL), LED400nm, 25 °C, under N2 for 24–48 h.Considering the ability
of 1a to act as a reducing
agent in the excited state (Eox* ∼ – 1.8 V vs SCE),[13] the photoreduction of activated alkyl bromides,
such as diethyl bromomalonate (Ered =
−0.62 V vs SCE) or 2-bromoacetophenone (Ered = −1.46 V vs SCE), would be possible.[14] For details and discussion on the optimization
studies, see Supporting Information. Detailed
screening of the reaction conditions revealed that 1a could be converted to the N1-acryloyl-substituted pyrazole 4a and isolated in 78% yield when irradiated with blue light
(450 nm) in the presence of diethyl bromomalonate (2.0 equiv) and
2,6-lutidine (1.5 equiv) as the base in DCM. To explore the substrate
scope, the above optimized reaction conditions were applied to a variety
of substituted pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazoles 1 (Scheme ). Bicycles 1 with electron-withdrawing groups on the benzene ring, such
as chloro and cyano, and electron-donating substituents, such as methoxy
and methyl, were well-tolerated in the present transformation and
showed no obvious difference in reactivity, as the corresponding products 4a–g were isolated in good yields. Moreover,
the reaction result was not altered when a naphthalene unit (example 4j) was introduced. Notably, it was also possible to extend
the substrate range to carbonyl, aminocarbonyl, and carbamate substituents
on both pyrazole rings in bicyclic substrates, resulting in good yields
of the corresponding products 4k, 4l, and 4n. Alkyl substitution was also tolerated as product 4i was isolated in a 65% yield. Unfortunately, the styryl-substituted
pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazole 1 gave product 4h in a rather low 30% isolated yield. When the N-methylpyrrole substituted bicycle 1 was reacted under
standard conditions, the corresponding N-acryloyl
substituted pyrazole 4o was isolated in a 15% yield,
together with the C5′ malonyl substituted derivative 4o′ in a 50% yield. The coupling of this electron-deficient
malonate radical at the C2 position with electron-rich arenes, such
as pyrroles, thiophenes, and furans under visible light-mediated conditions
was documented by Stephenson,[15] Trapp,[16] Noël,[17] and
Wu.[18] To demonstrate the scalability of
the method, a gram-scale experiment was performed to give 4a with a comparable 80% product yield.[13]
Gram scale yield.1 (0.5 mmol), diethyl bromomalonate
(2.0 equiv), 2,6-lutidine (1.5 equiv), DCM (2.5 mL), N2, 18 h.Optimization studies revealed that
the presence of nucleophiles,
such as water (Table SI2, entry 10)[13] in the reaction mixture favored the formation
of 5a as the major product. This suggests the possibility of regioselective
C5–N4 photoinduced nucleophilic ring opening of pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazoles 1. To explore the substrate and
nucleophile range for these types of transformations, we investigated
the reaction of 1a with various nucleophiles (Scheme ). In the presence
of diethyl bromomalonate (2.0 equiv) in DCM under LED450nm irradiation for 19 h at 25 °C, followed by the addition of
water (10 equiv), substrate 1a was successfully transformed
to the corresponding acid 5a in an excellent 97% yield
after isolation (Scheme ). It is worth noting that in this case no additional base was required.
In addition to water (Scheme , examples 5a, 5g, and 5i), other nucleophiles were also introduced. The reaction proved to
be equally successful in the presence of methanol and p-cresol, obtaining the corresponding esters 5b, 5c, 5h, 5j, and 5k in
good to excellent yields. Aliphatic amines and anilines were also
tolerated in this protocol, giving the desired amides 5d and 5e in reasonable 64% and 63% yields, respectively.
Moreover, l-alanine methyl ester was successfully coupled
under the developed protocol, obtaining product 5f in
a 60% yield. In addition, the reaction result was not significantly
altered by the substitution pattern on the pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazole core, as exemplified by products 5g–k. Interestingly, when bicycles 1 were reacted
in THF as the chosen solvent, the corresponding terminal halohydrin
esters 5l and 5m formed in reasonable yields
as a result of tetrahydrofuran ring opening induced by the pyrazolium
intermediate I2 (Scheme ).
Degassed Me2CO (H2O, 10 equiv).MeOH
(anhydrous, degassed, 2.5 mL).THF (anhydrous, degassed, 2.5 mL). [i] H2 (2 bar), 10%
Pd(C), 6 h.1 (0.5 mmol), diethyl bromomalonate (2.0 equiv), DCM (anhydrous, degassed,
2.5 mL), N2, 18 h, HNu (2.0 equiv).To gain more insight
into the photoinduced transformation of pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazoles 1, several control experiments
were conducted. First, an experiment was performed with on/off irradiation
with visible light. As shown in Figure SI2,[13] continuous irradiation with visible
light is essential for successful transformation. A reaction with
deuterated solvent (CD2Cl2) was also performed
in which no deuterated aldehyde 2D was detected. However,
when the C1-deuterated substrate 1D (Scheme a) was reacted under the standard
reaction conditions, only deuterated aldehyde 2D was
obtained. Furthermore, a crossover experiment with equimolar mixture
of 1d (100% H on C1) and 1D (>98% D on
C1)
under the standard reaction conditions resulted in no crossover product
being detected in the crude reaction mixture (Scheme b). To clarify from which excited state of
substrates 1 do the aldehyde products 2 originate
from, the reaction of 1a was caried out in the presence
of a triplet-annihilator, trans-stilbene (ET = 49.3 kcal/mol). It is noteworthy that 1
equiv of trans-stilbene inhibits the reaction (Figure SI1),[13] and
a significant amount of cis-stilbene (70%) is produced
during the reaction. The above experiments are consistent with visible
light excitation of bicycle 1 to the S1 excited
state, followed by ISC to the T1 excited state, which derives
the corresponding biradical intermediate after C5–N4 bond cleavage.
Subsequently, 1,5-hydrogen shift and aromatization gives the desired
products, pyrazoles 2 (Scheme a). In the case of C1-vinyl derived substrates 1, homolytic C1–N8 bond cleavage becomes the competitive
reaction process yielding diazepine products 3 upon 7-endo-trig
cyclization (Scheme SI9).[13] In addition, the reaction of 1a with diethyl
bromomalonate was also studied more in detail. The reaction of 1a with diethyl bromomalonate was tested under standard reaction
conditions in the presence of TEMPO as a radical scavenging reagent
(Scheme c). The formation
of the TEMPO-malonate product can be clearly identified by HRMS analysis
(exact mass: 316.2118 [C16H30NO5])
in the crude reaction mixture.[13] This result
and the formation of diethyl malonate adduct 4o′ (Scheme ) suggest
that the malonyl radical is most likely involved in this transformation.
The Stern–Volmer plot suggests that the interaction between
the excited pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazoles 1 and diethyl bromomalonate (Figure SI9)[13] exists. Following the reaction progress
by 1H NMR shows the formation of intermediate I2 (Figure SI3),[13] which upon the addition of water converts to a corresponding carboxylic
acid 5 or into product 4 upon addition of
2,6-lutidine as the base. On the basis of these experiments and related
literature precedents,[15−18] a possible reaction mechanism is shown in Scheme c. The pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazole 1 was first excited with visible light to form the excited 1*, which underwent single electron transfer (SET) with diethyl
bromomalonate to generate the corresponding radical cation of 1. The mesolytic loss of a bromide ion from the bromomalonate
radical anion would then provide the malonate radical. Deprotonation
of the radical cation intermediate of 1 yields the corresponding
radical intermediate I1, which in turn reacts with the
malonyl radical by SET to furnish the cationic intermediate I2. The pyrazolium intermediate I2 can provide
products 4 under basic reaction conditions or alternatively
give products 5 in the presence of nucleophiles.In summary, we have demonstrated a novel visible-light-induced
transformation of substituted pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazoles 1. Excitation leads to chemoselective C–N bond cleavage
of the pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazole scaffold, resulting
in densely substituted pyrazoles. The reaction outcome depends on
the nature of the substrates and the reaction protocol, thus providing
a versatile approach for functionalized pyrazole derivatives originating
from readily available starting materials. Further investigations
into applications of this methodology are currently ongoing.
Authors: Eva Pušavec Kirar; Uroš Grošelj; Giorgio Mirri; Franc Požgan; Gregor Strle; Bogdan Štefane; Vasko Jovanovski; Jurij Svete Journal: J Org Chem Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 4.354