| Literature DB >> 34076876 |
Xuanxuan Tian1, Xiangyan Ruan2,3, Juan Du1, Juan Wang1, Dongmei Yin1, Jiaojiao Cheng1, Rui Ju1, Alfred O Mueck1,4.
Abstract
To investigate sexual function in Chinese women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and to explore the correlation with clinical and biochemical characteristics. A cross-sectional study was designed in 1000 PCOS women, aged 18-45 years, via the Chinese version of Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) evaluating sexual function, with additional questions possibly related to sexual life. Clinical and biochemical characteristics likely to affect sexual function were determined, including anthropometric indicators, serum levels of hormones, luteinizing hormone to follicle-stimulating hormone ratio (LH/FSH ratio), prolactin (PRL), total testosterone (TT), free androgen index (FAI), sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), glucose, and lipid metabolism indicators. Nine hundred ten PCOS women participated in the study, 685 patients were included after screening, and 211 were suitable to detect correlations of clinical and biochemical characteristics with sex function parameters. The mean total FSFI score was 24.19 ± 2.8; 79.56% of the women were at risk of female sexual dysfunction (FSD). Women doing regular aerobic exercise and use of contraception had higher FSFI scores, while those with a desire to conceive and clinical signs of hyperandrogenism had lower FSFI scores. There were negative associations of FSFI scores with age and body fat distribution. No significant associations between FSFI scores and hormonal factors (surprisingly including SHBG) were found, except for total testosterone and satisfaction (OR = 0.976, p = 0.002). HOMA-IR was significantly related to reduced desire score (OR = 0.914, p = 0.004) and lubrication score (OR = 0.964, p = 0.044). PCOS was associated with a high risk of FSD (defined according to FSFI) in about 80% of the women in our study, and clinical characteristics play a more important role.Entities:
Keywords: Correlation; Polycystic ovarian syndrome; Sexual dysfunction; Sexual function
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34076876 PMCID: PMC8526448 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-021-00612-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Sci ISSN: 1933-7191 Impact factor: 2.924
Anthropometric and clinical characteristics of Chinese women with PCOS (n = 685)
| Variable | PCOS | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Age (y), mean (SD) | 29.02(4.17) | |
| 20–25, | 76 | 11.09 |
| 25–35, | 542 | 79.12 |
| 35–45, | 67 | 9.78 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 24.48 (4.47) | |
| < 25 kg/m2, | 441 | 64.38 |
| > = 25 kg/m2, | 244 | 35.62 |
| Contraception | ||
| Yes, | 220 | 32.12 |
| No, | 465 | 67.88 |
| Wish for conceive | ||
| Yes, | 458 | 66.86 |
| No, | 227 | 33.14 |
| Fear of unwanted pregnancy | ||
| Yes, | 34 | 4.96 |
| No, | 651 | 95.04 |
| Hirsutism and/or acne | ||
| None and mild, | 338 | 49.34 |
| Moderate, | 262 | 38.25 |
| Severe, | 85 | 12.41 |
| Aerobic exercise (times per week) | ||
| < 1, | 362 | 52.85 |
| 1–2, | 294 | 42.92 |
| > = 2, | 29 | 4.23 |
BMI body mass index
Biochemical characteristics of Chinese women with PCOS (n = 211)
| Variable | PCOS |
|---|---|
| Body fat distribution (g/cm), mean (SD) | 209.30 (55.19) |
| Body fat percentage (%), mean (SD) | 43.06 (5.75) |
| LH to FSH ratio, median (IQR) | 2.37 (0.91) |
| PRL (ng/ml), mean (SD) | 12.25 (5.78) |
| TT (ng/dl), median (IQR) | 46.76 (18.46) |
| SHBG (nmol/l), mean (SD) | 41.34 (24.09) |
| FAI, median (IQR) | 4.12(5.34) |
| FBS (mmol/L), median (IQR) | 4.90 (0.51) |
| FINS (uIU/ml), median (IQR) | 11.40 (7.04) |
| HOMA-IR, median (IQR) | 2.51 (1.58) |
| TG (mmol/L), mean (SD) | 2.00 (1.09) |
| TC (mmol/L), mean (SD) | 4.52 (0.92) |
| HDL-C (mmol/L), mean (SD) | 1.25 (0.36) |
| LDL-C (mmol/L), mean (SD) | 2.78 (0.71) |
LH luteinizing hormone, FSH follicle-stimulating hormone, PRL prolactin, TT total testosterone, SHBG sex hormone-binding globulin, FAI free androgen index, FBS fasting blood sugar, FINS fasting insulin, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance index, TG triglycerides, TC total cholesterol, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HOMA-IR was calculated using following formula: [glucose (nmol/L) × insulin (μU/mL)/22.5]
FSFI scores and proportion of participants with FSFI score < 26.55 (n = 685)
| Score | Mean | SD | Maximum | Minimum | Range | Number at risk of sexual dysfunction | Percentage at risk of sexual dysfunction (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total FSFI | 24.19 | 2.84 | 32.5 | 10.4 | 22.1 | 545 | 79.56 |
| Desire | 3.58 | 0.82 | 6.0 | 1.2 | 4.8 | 18 | 2.63 |
| Arousal | 3.94 | 0.76 | 6.0 | 1.2 | 4.8 | 11 | 1.61 |
| Lubrication | 4.48 | 0.62 | 6.0 | 1.8 | 4.2 | 66 | 9.64 |
| Orgasm | 3.83 | 0.98 | 6.0 | 1.2 | 4.8 | 38 | 5.55 |
| Satisfaction | 4.32 | 0.78 | 6.0 | 1.2 | 4.8 | 3 | 0.44 |
| Pain | 4.04 | 0.85 | 6.0 | 1.2 | 4.8 | 16 | 2.34 |
FSFI female sexual function index.
Fig. 1Comparison of mean FSFI scores for contraception, fear-pregnancy and wish-conceive. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; ns: there was no significant difference
Fig. 2Comparison of mean FSFI scores for aerobic exercise and hyperandrogenism. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01, *p < 0.05; NS: there was no significant difference
Correlations of Female Sexual Function Index and its domains with the clinical and biochemical features of women with PCOS (n = 211)
| Clinical and biochemical | Total FSFI | Desire | Arousal | Lubrication | Orgasm | Satisfaction | Pain | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | P | r | P | r | P | r | P | r | P | r | P | r | P | |
| Age (y) | −0.567 | < 0.001** | −0.299 | < 0.001** | −0.305 | < 0.001** | −0.294 | < 0.001** | −0.395 | < 0.001** | −0.448 | < 0.001** | −0.197 | < 0.001** |
| BMI (kg/m2) | −0.200 | < 0.001** | −0.165 | < 0.001** | −0.148 | < 0.001** | −0.106 | 0.005** | −0.048 | 0.110 | −0.139 | < 0.001** | 0.020 | 0.608 |
| Body fat distribution (g/cm) | −0.103 | 0.137 | −0.096 | 0.164 | −0.198 | 0.004** | −0.086 | 0.214 | 0.005 | 0.944 | 0.008 | 0.905 | 0.017 | 0.807 |
| Body fat percentage (%) | −0.169 | 0.014* | −0.109 | 0.113 | −0.193 | 0.005** | −0.163 | 0.018* | −0.033 | 0.637 | −0.115 | 0.096 | 0.065 | 0.346 |
| LH to FSH ratio | 0.113 | 0.103 | 0.063 | 0.365 | −0.059 | 0.392 | 0.032 | 0.647 | 0.066 | 0.341 | 0.081 | 0.240 | 0.073 | 0.288 |
| PRL (ng/ml) | −0.101 | 0.145 | −0.024 | 0.733 | 0.020 | 0.775 | 0.061 | 0.380 | −0.125 | 0.070 | −0.074 | 0.284 | −0.027 | 0.693 |
| TT (ng/dl) | 0.007 | 0.924 | −0.016 | 0.817 | −0.084 | 0.225 | 0.125 | 0.069 | −0.049 | 0.481 | −0.139 | 0.044* | 0.092 | 0.185 |
| SHBG (nmol/l) | 0.011 | 0.870 | 0.004 | 0.958 | −0.068 | 0.324 | −0.054 | 0.431 | 0.127 | 0.066 | −0.034 | 0.624 | −0.018 | 0.793 |
| FAI | −0.038 | 0.579 | −0.080 | 0.250 | 0.007 | 0.922 | 0.101 | 0.142 | 0.132 | 0.046* | 0.042 | 0.541 | 0.059 | 0.392 |
| FBS (mmol/L), | 0.005 | 0.938 | −0.005 | 0.944 | −0.037 | 0.590 | 0.085 | 0.219 | 0.043 | 0.536 | −0.068 | 0.324 | −0.016 | 0.815 |
| FINS (uIU/ml) | 0.108 | 0.118 | 0.071 | 0.302 | 0.023 | 0.737 | 0.084 | 0.222 | 0.123 | 0.076 | 0.050 | 0.474 | 0.074 | 0.283 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.080 | 0.248 | −0.152 | 0.028* | −0.001 | 0.948 | −0.189 | 0.006** | 0.120 | 0.081 | 0.090 | 0.195 | −0.046 | 0.510 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.077 | 0.264 | −0.029 | 0.677 | −0.024 | 0.732 | −0.025 | 0.719 | 0.085 | 0.220 | 0.038 | 0.586 | −0.046 | 0.503 |
| TC (mmol/L) | −0.006 | 0.933 | 0.026 | 0.705 | −0.006 | 0.935 | 0.063 | 0.366 | 0.058 | 0.401 | −0.065 | 0.345 | −0.048 | 0.492 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.142 | 0.040* | −0.047 | 0.493 | 0.015 | 0.832 | −0.101 | 0.145 | −0.022 | 0.752 | −0.035 | 0.612 | −0.047 | 0.495 |
| LDL -C (mmol/L) | −0.100 | 0.146 | −0.019 | 0.788 | −0.057 | 0.408 | −0.014 | 0.838 | −0.060 | 0.383 | −0.116 | 0.094 | −0.039 | 0.576 |
BMI body mass index, LH luteinizing hormone, FSH follicle-stimulating hormone, PRL prolactin, TT total testosterone, SHBG sex hormone-binding globulin, FAI Free androgen index, FBS fasting blood sugar, FINS fasting insulin, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance index, TG triglycerides, TC total cholesterol, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
*p < 0.05. **p < 0.01
Fig. 3Multivariate generalized linear regression analysis of FSFI scores with general characteristics. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; *p < 0.05
Fig. 4Multivariate linear regression analysis of FSFI scores with clinical and biochemical characteristics. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; *p < 0.05