Literature DB >> 34076779

Experiences with scans and scanxiety in people with advanced cancer: a qualitative study.

Kim Tam Bui1,2, Prunella Blinman3,4, Belinda E Kiely3,4,5,6, Chris Brown5, Haryana M Dhillon7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Scan-associated anxiety ('scanxiety') in people with advanced cancer is a common clinical problem. This study aims to explore the experiences of scans and scanxiety in people with advanced cancer, including their strategies to reduce scanxiety.
METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with people with advanced cancers who had a computed tomography scan for monitoring of their cancer. Data was analysed with an interpretivist approach using framework analysis.
RESULTS: Interviews with 16 participants identified three key themes: the scan experience, the scanxiety experience and coping with scans. Scans were viewed as a routine and normal part of cancer care. Scanxiety was experienced differently by each person. Scanxiety often related to the scan result rather than the scan and led to psycho-cognitive manifestations. Adaptive coping strategies were often self-derived.
CONCLUSION: People with advanced cancer experience scanxiety, but often accept scanxiety as a normal part of the cancer process. The findings fit within a transactional model of stress and coping, which influences the level of scanxiety for each individual. Quantitative research to determine the scope of scanxiety will be useful to develop formal approaches to reduce scanxiety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxiety; Cancer; Imaging; Qualitative study; Scans; Scanxiety

Year:  2021        PMID: 34076779     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06319-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  4 in total

1.  Breast cancer knowledge among women with intellectual disabilities and their experiences of receiving breast mammography.

Authors:  Maria Truesdale-Kennedy; Laurence Taggart; Sonja McIlfatrick
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Women's experiences and preferences regarding breast imaging after completing breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Susan Brandzel; Dori E Rosenberg; Dianne Johnson; Mary Bush; Karla Kerlikowske; Tracy Onega; Louise Henderson; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Wendy DeMartini; Karen J Wernli
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.

Authors:  Nicola K Gale; Gemma Heath; Elaine Cameron; Sabina Rashid; Sabi Redwood
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Patient experience and perceived acceptability of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal and lung cancer compared with current staging scans: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ruth Evans; Stuart Taylor; Sam Janes; Steve Halligan; Alison Morton; Neal Navani; Alf Oliver; Andrea Rockall; Jonathan Teague; Anne Miles
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Is the EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning scale appropriate as an initial screening measure to identify brain tumour patients who may possibly have a mood disorder?

Authors:  Quirien Oort; Hanneke Zwinkels; Johan A F Koekkoek; Maaike J Vos; Jaap C Reijneveld; Martin J B Taphoorn; Linda Dirven
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.955

2.  Screening for Brain Metastases in Patients With NSCLC: A Qualitative Study on the Psychologic Impact of Being Diagnosed With Asymptomatic Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Janna J A O Schoenmaekers; Jeroen Bruinsma; Claire Wolfs; Lidia Barberio; Anita Brouns; Anne-Marie C Dingemans; Lizza E L Hendriks
Journal:  JTO Clin Res Rep       Date:  2022-08-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.