Literature DB >> 34075858

The difference between squat jump and countermovement jump in 770 male and female participants from different sports.

Žiga Kozinc1,2, Jure Žitnik1,3, Darjan Smajla1,3, Nejc Šarabon1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Traditionally, a larger difference between countermovement (CMJ) and squat jump (SJ) was seen as beneficial, as it reflects the ability to utilize the stretch-shortening cycle. However, strong arguments have been made that this might not always be the case, as larger differences between the jumps could also suggest higher muscle-tendon slack, or poor capability to take this slack up quickly. The purpose of this study was to explore SJ and CMJ, as well as the CMJ to SJ difference (CMJSJDiff) in 9 groups of young athletes. In total, 712 athletes from various disciplines (mean age range: 15.7-36.3 years) and 58 physical education students (mean age: 19.6 years) participated in the study. The major finding of this study was that the groups that showed better SJ and CMJ performance did not show the larger CMJSJDiff. For instance, SJ and CMJ heights were highest in short-distance runners and lowest in long-distance runners, while the largest and smallest CMJSJDiff was shown in physical education students and speed skaters, respectively. Male athletes had a higher CMJSJDiff than female athletes, but the difference was very small. While a larger CMJSJDiff has been traditionally associated viewed as positive, our results could indicate both superior ability to utilize the stretch-shortening cycle, as well as poor ability of rapid force development and excessive muscle slack. Further studies are needed to directly investigate the associations between CMJSJDiff and indicators of athletic performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elastic index; countermovement jump; eccentric utilization ratio; jumping performance; squat jump; young athletes

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34075858     DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1936654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci        ISSN: 1536-7290            Impact factor:   4.050


  3 in total

1.  Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Squat as Conditioning Activity Within a Contrast Training Sequence in High-Level Preadolescent Trampoline Gymnasts.

Authors:  Shengtao Yang; Peng Zhang; Marta Sevilla-Sanchez; Dong Zhou; Jie Cao; Jiajian He; Binghong Gao; Eduardo Carballeira
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Questionable Utility of the Eccentric Utilization Ratio in Relation to the Performance of Volleyball Players.

Authors:  Žiga Kozinc; Jernej Pleša; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Postural Stability in Single-Leg Quiet Stance in Highly Trained Athletes: Sex and Sport Differences.

Authors:  Nebojša Trajković; Darjan Smajla; Žiga Kozinc; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.