Literature DB >> 34075469

The CT scout view: complementary value added to abdominal CT interpretation.

Matthew H Lee1, Meghan G Lubner2, Vincent M Mellnick3, Christine O Menias4, Sanjeev Bhalla3, Perry J Pickhardt2.   

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) scout images, also known as CT localizer radiographs, topograms, or scanograms, are an important, albeit often overlooked part of the CT examination. Scout images may contain important findings outside of the scanned field of view on CT examinations of the abdomen and pelvis, such as unsuspected lung cancer at the lung bases. Alternatively, scout images can provide complementary information to findings within the scanned field of view, such as characterization of retained surgical foreign bodies. Assessment of scout images adds value and provides a complementary "opportunistic" review for interpretation of abdominopelvic CT examinations. Scout image review is a useful modern application of conventional abdominal radiograph interpretation that can help establish a diagnosis or narrow a differential diagnosis. This review discusses the primary purpose and intent of the CT scout images, addresses standard of care and bias related to scout image review, and presents a general systematic approach to assessing scout images with multiple illustrative examples, including potential pitfalls in interpreting scout images.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; CT interpretation; abdominal CT; scout review; scout view

Year:  2021        PMID: 34075469     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03135-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  43 in total

1.  Reviewing CT Scout Images: Observations of an Expert Witness.

Authors:  Richard H Daffner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  CT scout view as an essential part of CT reading.

Authors:  O R Brook; L Guralnik; A Engel
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  2007-06

Review 3.  Foreign objects encountered in the abdominal cavity at CT.

Authors:  Gabriela Gayer; Ivan Petrovitch; R Brooke Jeffrey
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 4.  Imaging of abdominal and pelvic surgical and postprocedural foreign bodies.

Authors:  Gabriela Gayer; Meghan G Lubner; Sanjeev Bhalla; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  The CT scout view: does it need to be routinely reviewed as part of the CT interpretation?

Authors:  Pamela T Johnson; William W Scott; Bob W Gayler; Jonathan S Lewin; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Reviewing the CT scout view: medicolegal and ethical considerations.

Authors:  Leonard Berlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Bias in Radiology: The How and Why of Misses and Misinterpretations.

Authors:  Lindsay P Busby; Jesse L Courtier; Christine M Glastonbury
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 8.  Heuristics and Cognitive Error in Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Jason N Itri; Sohil H Patel
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  CT scout films: don't forget to look!

Authors:  Seyed A Emamian; Elizabeth C Dubovsky; L Gilbert Vezina; William Carter; Dorothy I Bulas
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-05-13

10.  Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery.

Authors:  Atul A Gawande; David M Studdert; E John Orav; Troyen A Brennan; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.