Lauren M Walker1,2, Carly S Sears3, Reanne Booker3, Sarah Glaze3,4, Corinne Doll3,4, Tien Phan3,4, Kerrie Brennan3, John W Robinson3,4. 1. Department of Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Holy Cross Site, 2202 2nd St SW, Calgary, AB, T3S 2C1, Canada. Lauren.walker@ahs.ca. 2. Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, 1331 29th Street N.W., Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada. Lauren.walker@ahs.ca. 3. Department of Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Holy Cross Site, 2202 2nd St SW, Calgary, AB, T3S 2C1, Canada. 4. Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, 1331 29th Street N.W., Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Screening and discussion about sexual health concerns within cancer care are frequently impeded by lack of access to sexual health resources and lack of fluency with sexual health topics. To address this, a multi-disciplinary sexual health program was developed and piloted in a Canadian tertiary cancer center. The aim of this study was to assess referring health care providers' perspectives on the newly implemented oncology sexual health program. METHODS: A brief online survey was administered system-wide to cancer care providers to query their perceptions of the pilot multidisciplinary sexual health program, the Oncology and Sexuality, Intimacy and Survivorship (OASIS) program. RESULTS: According to survey results, the OASIS program was perceived by health care providers as valuable, helpful for patients, and important for addressing gaps in clinical care. Additional comments indicated an ongoing need for increased access to information about the program and referral procedures. CONCLUSION: Survey results highlight the need for consistent program dissemination efforts to equip health care providers with accessible patient education materials and easily implemented referral procedures. Importantly, providers indicated that they were more likely to raise the topic of sexuality with patients because they had somewhere to refer patients who had sexual concerns. Overall, findings inform efforts to implement sexual health programming within cancer care institutions.
PURPOSE: Screening and discussion about sexual health concerns within cancer care are frequently impeded by lack of access to sexual health resources and lack of fluency with sexual health topics. To address this, a multi-disciplinary sexual health program was developed and piloted in a Canadian tertiary cancer center. The aim of this study was to assess referring health care providers' perspectives on the newly implemented oncology sexual health program. METHODS: A brief online survey was administered system-wide to cancer care providers to query their perceptions of the pilot multidisciplinary sexual health program, the Oncology and Sexuality, Intimacy and Survivorship (OASIS) program. RESULTS: According to survey results, the OASIS program was perceived by health care providers as valuable, helpful for patients, and important for addressing gaps in clinical care. Additional comments indicated an ongoing need for increased access to information about the program and referral procedures. CONCLUSION: Survey results highlight the need for consistent program dissemination efforts to equip health care providers with accessible patient education materials and easily implemented referral procedures. Importantly, providers indicated that they were more likely to raise the topic of sexuality with patients because they had somewhere to refer patients who had sexual concerns. Overall, findings inform efforts to implement sexual health programming within cancer care institutions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer; Oncology; Program implementation; Sexual health service; Sexuality; Survivorship
Authors: Roanne Millman; Natalie Jacox; Carly Sears; John W Robinson; Jill Turner; Lauren M Walker Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kathryn E Flynn; Jennifer Barsky Reese; Diana D Jeffery; Amy P Abernethy; Li Lin; Rebecca A Shelby; Laura S Porter; Carrie B Dombeck; Kevin P Weinfurt Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2011-03-10 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Victoria Huynh; Sudheer Vemuru; Karen Hampanda; Jessica Pettigrew; Marcella Fasano; Helen L Coons; Kristin E Rojas; Anosheh Afghahi; Gretchen Ahrendt; Simon Kim; Dan D Matlock; Sarah E Tevis Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-08-01 Impact factor: 4.339