| Literature DB >> 34075330 |
Vishnubhotla Ravikanth1, Mitnala Sasikala1, Vankadari Naveen2, Sabbu Sai Latha3, Kishore Venkata Laxmi Parsa3, Ketavarapu Vijayasarathy1, Ramars Amanchy4, Steffie Avanthi1, Bale Govardhan1, Kalapala Rakesh1, Daram Sarala Kumari1, Bojja Srikaran1, Guduru Venkat Rao1, D Nageshwar Reddy1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mortality due to COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection varies among populations. Functional relevance of genetic variations in Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and Transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2), two crucial host factors for viral entry, might explain some of this variation.Entities:
Keywords: ACE2; COVID-19; Disease severity; Genotyping; SARS-CoV-2; TMPRSS2
Year: 2021 PMID: 34075330 PMCID: PMC8161869 DOI: 10.1016/j.mgene.2021.100930
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Meta Gene ISSN: 2214-5400
Clinical characteristics of the study participants.
| Parameter | Asymptomatic ( | Mild to Moderate# ( | Severe ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age in years (Mean ± SD) | 37·25 ± 15·09 | 52·0 ± 14·2 | 57·9 ± 13·6* |
| Age Range in Years - | 1·5–80 | 24–90 | 26–92 |
| Gender (Male) | 189 (63·2%) | 83 (69·8%) | 69 (75·0%) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22·04 ± 1·27 | 24·03 ± 4·17 | 27·16 ± 4·66* |
| Comorbidities | |||
| Normal | 285 (95·3%) | 55 (46·2%) | 41 (44·6%) |
| Only diabetes | 3 (1·0%) | 15 (12·6%) | 14 (15·2%)** |
| Only Hypertension | 2 (0·7%) | 20 (16·8%) | 11 (11·9%)** |
| Diabetes/Hypertension | 9 (3·0%) | 29 (24·4%) | 26 (28·3%)** |
| Blood Counts | |||
| Haemoglobin (g/dL) | 13·4 ± 2·0 | 13·9 ± 9·5 | 12·6 ± 2·7* |
| RBC (cells/mcL) | 4·9 ± 0·6 | 4·5 ± 0·7 | 4·4 ± 0·9* |
| WBC cells/μl | 7823·4 ± 2594·6 | 7301·7 ± 3629·0 | 11,277·2 ± 6409·4* |
| Neutrophils (%) | 54·3 ± 11·1 | 68·0 ± 13·3 | 82·6 ± 9·3* |
| Lymphocytes (%) | 37·0 ± 9·9 | 24·8 ± 11·5 | 11·7 ± 8·2* |
| Eosinophils (%) | 3·2 ± 2·8 | 1·8 ± 1·5 | 1·3 ± 0·7* |
| Monocytes (%) | 5·2 ± 2·2 | 5·2 ± 2·1 | 4·1 ± 2·2* |
| Platelets (mcL) | 3·0 ± 1·3 | 2·4 ± 1·0 | 2·4 ± 1·1* |
| Oxygen Delivery | |||
| On room air | None | 92 (77·3%) | 5 (5·4%) |
| On face Mask | None | 2 (1·7%) | 3 (3·3%) |
| Nasal Prongs | None | 24 (20·2%) | 10 (10·9%) |
| On NIV | None | 1 (0·8%) | 22 (23·9%) |
| On HFNC | None | 0 | 2 (2·2%) |
| NRBM Mask | None | 0 | 3 (3·2%) |
| Ventilator | None | 0 | 47 (51·1%)** |
| FiO2 | None | 22·7 ± 5·5 | 74·2 ± 24·8* |
| Serum Ferritin Level (ng/ml) | 127·4 ± 71·2 | 568·6 ± 638·9 | 1178·6 ± 930·4* |
| IL-6 Levels (pg/ml) | 9·5 ± 5·2 | 41·0 ± 97·2 | 230·9 ± 211·2* |
| D Dimer (ng/ml) | < 200 | 441·0 ± 560·8 | 1217·1 ± 1615·1* |
| Chest X-ray | |||
| Normal | 239 (79·9%) | 37 (31·1%) | 0 (0%) |
| Unilateral infiltration | 60 (2·0%) | 31 (26·1%) | 1 (1·1%) |
| Bilateral infiltration | 0 | 51 (42·8%) | 91 (98·9%)** |
| CT Scan | |||
| CT CO-RAD Score | NA | 4·5 ± 0·9 | 4·9 ± 0·5* |
#Among the 119 patients in the mild-to-moderate group, 36 (30·2%) had moderate severity. Baseline age (p = 0·17), gender (p = 0·41) and proportion with diabetes (p = 0·27), hypertension (p = 0·77) and both (p = 0·91) were similar for the patients with mild (n = 83) vs moderate (n = 36) severity; therefore, these groups were combined in the analysis.
*One-way ANOVA (P < 0·05) **Fishers exact (P < 0·05).
SD – standard deviation; g – gram, dL – deci liter; mcl/μl – micro liter; ng – nanogram; pg – pico gram; ml – milli liter; CT – Computerized Tomography; % - percent; NIV – Non-invasive ventilation; HFNC – High flow nasal cannula; NRBM – Non-rebreather masks; FiO2 –Fraction of inspired oxygen; NA- Not applicable; ND – Not done. CORAD - COVID-19 Reporting and Data System
Fig. 1Representative image depicting Whole exome sequencing data and the identification of a variant in TMPRSS2. (A) Variant representation at the whole exome level extracted from Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) (B), Variant representation at the chromosome level (chr. 21) extracted from Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) (C), Localization of the TMPRSS2 gene to q 22·2 loci (D) the variant c.589G> A is located in the 6th exon of TMPRSS2 gene that has 14 exons (E) representative images of the Wild type, Heterozygous and Mutant genotypes with the variant mapped to SRCR domain (Scavenger Receptor Cysteine-Rich protein domain. While the wild type produces a normal protein, the variant is located in an exonic splicing enhancer site (Srp40), that is associated with an increased chance of exon skipping or protein malformation that is due to disruption of potential exonic splicing enhancer site. (F) domains of TMPRSS2. NTD – N terminal domain; CTD – C terminal domain; T M transmembrane domain; Chr – chromosome, kb – kilo bases.
Association between TMPRSS2 variant and severity using the dominant and recessive genetic models.
| Type of Comparison | Minor Allele (A) Frequency | Model | Genotype | Controls | Patients | Odds Ratio | 95% CI | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||||||
| Controls Vs Asymptomatic | 0.27 Vs 0.31 | Dominant | GG Vs (GA + AA) | 277 and 223 | 139 and 160 | 0.01 | 0.69 | 0.52 | 0.93 | 0.01 |
| Recessive | (GG + GA) Vs AA | 457 and 43 | 273 and 26 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.59 | 1.64 | 0.96 | ||
| Asymptomatic Vs Mild to Moderate | 0.31 Vs 0.21 | Dominant | GG Vs (GA + AA) | 139 and 160 | 74 and 45 | 0.003 | 1.89 | 1.22 | 2.92 | 0.004 |
| Recessive | (GG + GA) Vs AA | 273 and 26 | 116 and 3 | 0.02 | 3.68 | 1.09 | 12.40 | 0.03 | ||
| Asymptomatic Vs Severe | 0.31 Vs 0.19 | Dominant | GG Vs (GA + AA) | 139 and 160 | 56 and 36 | 0.01 | 1.79 | 1.11 | 2.88 | 0.01 |
| Recessive | (GG + GA) Vs AA | 273 and 26 | 92 and 0 | 0.003 | 17.92 | 1.08 | 297.07 | 0.04 | ||
Genotype GG is wild type, GA is heterozygous and AA homozygous mutant. “A” allele was considered as protective. To obtain Odds ratio, we compared the genotypes between Controls Vs Asymptomatic; Asymptomatic Vs Mild to moderate and Asymptomatic Vs Severe categories under Dominant and Recessive genetic models.
Fig. 2Bar graphs depicting Minor allele frequency, Odds ratio, correlation and CT images in the study group (A) Minor allele Frequency (MAF) in Controls, asymptomatic, mild-to-moderate and severe patients. Decreasing trend was noted in MAF with increasing severity (B) MAF and Odds ratio (Dominant and Recessive Models) in Asymptomatic, Mild-to-moderate and Severe COVID19 patients. An inverse trend was seen between risk for severity and MAF. Green bars depict Minor allele frequency, Blue bars depict Odds ratio (Dominant Model) and Yellow bars depict Odds ratio (Recessive Model). Green colour dotted line depicts Linear for MAF, blue colour dotted line depicts Linear for Odds ratio (Dominant Model) and Yellow colour dotted line depicts Linear for Odds ratio (Recessive model) (C) A negative correlation (Pearson's correlation coefficient; r = −0·76) was seen between MAF and mortality rates (D and E) Representative CT images of a patient with mild symptoms with genotype GA and AA(variant), (F) severe disease with GG genotype (wild).
Fig. 3Molecular dynamics and simulation analysis of WT and V160M mutant TMPRSS2. Cartoon representation showing the N-terminal domain TMPRSS2 (A) Wild-Type TMPRSS2, (B) V160M mutant TMPRSS2 and (C and D) Superimposing of Wild-Type and V160M structures. The position of amino-acid Valine and Methionine are shown in pink sticks and change in the TMPRSS2 secondary structure is noticeable. (E and F) B-factor profiles of wild type and V160M mutant structure of TMPRSS2. The difference in the domain oscillation or B-factor resulting in structural change are marked in red dashed box.
Fig. 4TMPRSS2 Expression. (A) Representative image showing higher mRNA levels of TMPRSS2 in variant carriers as compared to wild type (B)Representative IHC image (10×) showing higher TMPRSS2 protein expression in variant carriers (right panel) as compared to wild type (left panel). Arrows indicate the epithelial lining (C) Left Panel indicating Immunoblot analysis of HEK 293 T cells transfected with indicated constructs using Flag tag antibody. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with β-actin antibody to ensure uniform loading. *, non-specific and Right Panel depicts Densitometry quantification of unprocessed band (~54 kDa form) intensity using ImageJ. Data represents mean + SD of 4 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's ‘t’ test. #, p < 0·05. (D) Left panel representing Immunoblot analysis of HEK 293 T cells transfected with the indicated constructs using Flag tag antibody. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with GAPDH antibody to ensure uniform loading. Uncleaved, S2 and S2’ fragments highlighted. *, non-specific and Right Panel depicting Densitometry quantification of S2’ band intensity using ImageJ. Data represents mean + SD of 4 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's ‘t’ test. ##, p < 0·01.