| Literature DB >> 34075281 |
Deeksha Tayal1, Aasha Kapur Mehta1.
Abstract
Availability of safe, reliable and affordable public transport facilitates access to work opportunities. This relationship between transport and economic independence is not gender neutral. Delhi's Metro Rail Network marked a milestone in this regard as it provided a gender-sensitive means of mass transit with specific facilities for women passengers. However, the onset of Covid-19 pandemic, followed by restrictions on mobility and change in working habits, brought the urban public transport network to a standstill. Given this background, the paper explores the impact of Metro Rail Network on the commuting pattern and preferences of working women in Delhi-NCR region as well as the travel-related challenges faced by women that were magnified during the pandemic. © Indian Society of Labour Economics 2021.Entities:
Keywords: Commuting problems; Covid-19; Delhi metro; Domestic duties; Safe transport; Working women
Year: 2021 PMID: 34075281 PMCID: PMC8161715 DOI: 10.1007/s41027-021-00313-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Labour Econ ISSN: 0019-5308
Average daily ridership in the metro and in buses in NCT of Delhi (in lakh)
| Year | Average daily ridership in lakh | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Metro | DTC + cluster buses | Ridership on buses/metro | |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | Column 3/2 |
| 2005–2006 | 30.52 | ||
| 2006–2007 | 26.77 | ||
| 2007–2008 | 6.25 | 24.04 | 3.85 |
| 2008–2009 | 7.22 | 22.62 | 3.13 |
| 2009–2010 | 9.19 | 24.16 | 2.63 |
| 2010–2011 | 12.59 | 30.32 | 2.41 |
| 2011–2012 | 16.60 | 44.20 | 2.66 |
| 2012–2013 | 19.26 | 46.77 | 2.43 |
| 2013–2014 | 21.90 | 49.83 | 2.28 |
| 2014–2015 | 23.86 | 48.82 | 2.05 |
| 2015–2016 | 26.00 | 45.98 | 1.77 |
| 2016–2017 | 27.61* | 41.80 | 1.51 |
| 2017–2018 | 25.37* | 41.51 | 1.64 |
| 2018–2019 | 25.97* | 42.39 | 1.63 |
| 2019–2020 | 50.65*** | 51.02 | |
Source: Government of NCT of Delhi 2021
*Estimates for the metro do not include Airport line and Rapid metro
***Line utilization (line utilization calculates a metro journey in terms of the number of corridors used by a passenger)
Frequency of metro usage by working women
| Metro usage | Frequency | Per cent |
|---|---|---|
| Regular | 69 | 47.6 |
| Occasional | 41 | 28.3 |
| Never | 35 | 24.1 |
| Total | 145 | 100 |
Source: primary survey
Fig. 1Regular means of commuting to workplace (%)
Average commuting time to office and dependence on the metro
| S. No | Average commuting time (min) | Frequency of metro use | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regularly | Occasionally | Never | ||
| 1 | 30 min or less | 17.0 | 32.2 | 50.9 |
| 2 | 31 min to 60 min | 58.2 | 36.4 | 5.5 |
| 3 | 61 min and above | 87.1 | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Total | 47.6 | 28.3 | 24.1 | |
Source: primary survey
Metro connectivity and frequency of using the metro
| S. No | Coverage | Frequency of metro use | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regularly | Occasionally | Never | ||
| 1 | Metro covers entire route (within 3 km) | 81.1 | 10.8 | 8.1 |
| 2 | Metro covers partial route (within 3 km) | 76.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| 3 | Metro is too far (beyond 3 km) | 3.7 | 77.8 | 18.5 |
| 4 | No metro connectivity | 0 | 32.3 | 67.7 |
| Total | 47.6 | 28.3 | 24.1 | |
Source: primary survey
Fig. 2Frequency of metro usage by age cohort of working women
Age-cohort-wise regular mode of travel to the workplace (%)
| Age-cohorts | E-rickshaw | Auto-rickshaw | Hired cab | Metro | Office bus | Office cab | Personal vehicle | Public bus | Walk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20–35 years | 1.9 | 10.2 | 2.8 | 58.3 | 0.9 | 4.6 | 15.7 | 3.7 | 1.9 |
| 36–50 years | 8.3 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 28.8 | 0.0 | 23.6 |
| More than 50 years | 0.0 | 19.1 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 47.6 | 4.8 | 9.5 |
| Total | 2.1 | 11.0 | 3.5 | 47.6 | 0.7 | 3.5 | 20.7 | 3.5 | 7.6 |
Source: primary survey
Average time spent (per day) on domestic chores by working women during weekdays and weekends
| No. of hours | Weekdays | Weekends |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2.1 | 1.4 |
| 1–2 | 45.5 | 28.5 |
| 3–4 | 32.4 | 29.9 |
| 5 or more | 20.0 | 40.3 |
| Total | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Source: primary survey
Frequency of metro usage by family size of working women
| Number of family members | Regularly | Occasionally | Never |
|---|---|---|---|
| Less than equal to 4 | 40.6 | 29.0 | 30.4 |
| 5 or more | 54.0 | 27.6 | 18.4 |
| Total | 47.6 | 28.3 | 24.1 |
Source: primary survey
Fig. 3Metro usage by married women.
Source: primary survey
Job permanence and frequency of metro usage
| Job characteristics | Frequency of metro use | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Regularly | Occasionally | Never | |
| Permanent | 42.5 | 26.4 | 31.0 |
| Temporary | 55.2 | 31.0 | 13.8 |
| Total | 47.6 | 28.3 | 24.1 |
Source: primary survey
Job designation and frequency of metro usage
| Job designation | Frequency of metro use | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Regularly | Occasionally | Never | |
| Junior | 57.6 | 30.3 | 12.1 |
| Middle | 50.0 | 23.9 | 26.1 |
| Senior | 24.2 | 30.3 | 45.5 |
| Total | 47.6 | 28.3 | 24.1 |
Source: primary survey
Challenges of Delhi metro for women (%)
| S. No | Problems | Per cent |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overcrowding | 69.9 |
| 2a | Safety problems of last-mile connectivity | 47.4 |
| 2b | Safety issues while commuting | 17.5 |
| 3 | Affordability | 45.7 |
| 4 | System is not user friendly | 0.4 |
| 5 | No issues | 0.6 |
Source: primary survey
Preference pattern for using metro during late evening
| Is metro the preferred means of transport | Per cent |
|---|---|
| Yes | 83.8 |
| No | 16.2 |
| Total | 100.0 |
| Other preferred means of transport | |
| Office cab | 46.7 |
| The family picks up from the office | 70.7 |
| Private cab or auto | 28.0 |
Source: primary survey