| Literature DB >> 34075159 |
Yun Zhu1, Liyun Han2, Peng Li1, Xiaolong Kang1, Xingang Dan1, Yun Ma1, Yuangang Shi3.
Abstract
ulked Segregant Analysis (BSA) is a rapid strategy for identifying genetic markers in specific regions of the phenotypical population and it has been widely used for QTLs mapping in smaller mixed F2 and F3 populations. We applied a modified BSA method to assessed genome-wide homozygous and heterozygous linkage patterns in the Chinese Wagyu Beef Cattle F2/F3 mixed population. Two overlapped regions from F2 and F3 populations on autosomes were found with high-density heterozygote alleles between high and low intramuscular fat groups. Regions from 24.8 M ~ 29.6 M of chromosome 23 were identified as most significantly correlated to the intramuscular fat in our samples. We also identified other 4 potential loci on chromosomes 5, 9, 15, and 21 correlated with Intramuscular fat. This study provided a novel low-cost method for QTLs mapping and identify molecular markers of phenotypical changes in a small mixed population.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34075159 PMCID: PMC8169923 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91101-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
The background information of samples.
| Dam | Male | Number | Name of the cattle farmer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qinchuan | Wagyu | 113 | Ningxia Yijiayi Farming and Animal Husbandry Co. Ltd., Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China |
| Qinchuan × Wagyu | Wagyu | 40 | Ningxia Xuanheyuan Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Co. Ltd., Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China |
| Qinchuan × Wagyu × Wagyu | Wagyu | 33 | Shandong YuanLong Co. Ltd., Shandong Province, China |
Figure 1Population distribution of samples (left) and each sample frequency distribution of intramuscular fat (right).
Figure 2Workflow of variants calling (blue boxes) and QTL mapping (grey boxes).
High density of SNP between two groups (> 30 SNP/Mb).
| Group | Chrome | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| F2 | 7 | 95,600,000 | 97,000,000 |
| F2 | 15 | 50,600,000 | 52,400,000 |
| F2 | 19 | 55,600,000 | 57,400,000 |
| F2 | 23 | 25,200,000 | 29,600,000 |
| F3 | 4 | 105,200,000 | 106,200,000 |
| F3 | 7 | 5,000,000 | 6,600,000 |
| F3 | 19 | 55,200,000 | 56,600,000 |
| F3 | 23 | 24,800,000 | 29,600,000 |
| F3 | 27 | 32,200,000 | 34,000,000 |
Figure 3(a) SNP density plot (Filter SNP with allelic frequency difference > = 0.3 in two groups). Figures from left to right were the population F2 and F3; (b) QTL-mapping of allele frequency difference of F2, and F3 population with the degree of freedom.
Figure 4Expression pattern of 46 gene in chromosome 23: 24.8 M ~ 29.6 M.
Loci and statistical power (DF > = 0.3).
| Population | Chrome | Pos | Power4(DF) |
|---|---|---|---|
| F2 | 5 | 58,695,696 | 0.4358063 |
| 7 | 40,433,553 | 0.3164062 | |
| 15 | 81,148,712 | 0.4822531 | |
| 21 | 34,817,429 | 0.4822531 | |
| F3 | 2 | 19,661,262 | 0.3811172 |
| 2 | 65,195,647 | 0.3426863 | |
| 2 | 121,333,197 | 0.3659503 | |
| 3 | 31,979,076 | 0.3099656 | |
| 5 | 29,006,626 | 0.4096 | |
| 9 | 34,246,206 | 0.4978714 | |
| 11 | 46,714,219 | 0.342135 | |
| 13 | 42,035,405 | 0.3048815 | |
| 18 | 63,302,729 | 0.3226693 | |
| 19 | 32,997,278 | 0.3016062 | |
| 19 | 41,594,141 | 0.3458889 | |
| 21 | 34,817,458 | 0.4822531 | |
| 21 | 34,817,459 | 0.4822531 | |
| 23 | 24,479,417 | 0.3465916 | |
| 23 | 25,583,794 | 0.3659503 | |
| 27 | 33,107,854 | 0.3064806 |
Figure 5Variance analysis of allele frequency in 10 SNP slide windows.