| Literature DB >> 34075153 |
Munehisa Shimamura1,2,3,4, Koichi Kaikita5, Hironori Nakagami6, Tomohiro Kawano7,6, Nan Ju6, Hiroki Hayashi6, Ryo Nakamaru6, Shota Yoshida6, Tsutomu Sasaki7, Hideki Mochizuki7, Kenichi Tsujita5, Ryuichi Morishita8.
Abstract
In post-stroke patients, a decreased adherence to antiplatelet drugs is a major challenge in the prevention of recurrent stroke. Previously, we reported an antiplatelet vaccine against S100A9 in mice, but the use of Freund's adjuvant and the difference in amino acid sequences in epitopes between mice and humans were problematic for clinical use. Here, we redesigned the S100A9 vaccine for the common sequence in both humans and monkeys and examined its effects in cynomolgus monkeys with Alum adjuvant. First, we assessed several candidate epitopes and selected 102 to 112 amino acids as the suitable epitope, which could produce antibodies. When this peptide vaccine was intradermally injected into 4 cynomolgus monkeys with Alum, the antibody against human S100A9 was successfully produced. Anti-thrombotic effects were shown in two monkeys in a mixture of vaccinated serum and fresh whole blood from another cynomolgus monkey. Additionally, the anti-thrombotic effects were partially inhibited by the epitope peptide, indicating the feasibility of neutralizing anti-thrombotic effects of produced antibodies. Prolongation of bleeding time was not observed in vaccinated monkeys. Although further studies on increasing the effect of vaccine and safety are necessary, this vaccine will be a promising approach to improve adherence to antiplatelet drugs in clinical settings.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34075153 PMCID: PMC8169762 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91153-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Selection of epitope and study protocol. (A) Selected epitope in S100A9 in mice, monkeys, and humans. For screening in mice, new epitopes (in red) and the previous epitope (double arrow)[6] were examined. The epitope colored blue was used in the monkey experiment. (B) Study protocol. Serum is collected before vaccination and 14 days after vaccination. Collected serum was added to the fresh whole blood from another monkey or human, and the mixture was analyzed in T-TAS. T-TAS total thrombus formation analysis system.
Figure 2Production of antibody against S100A9 by vaccination. (A,B) The antibody titers against the epitope in mice (A) and monkeys (B). (A) The epitopes in C-terminus (97–106 aa and 104–113 aa) are more effective than that in N-terminus (2–11 aa). Data represent the mean ± SEM of n = 3 in each group. (B) Antibody titers before (left bar) and after (right bar) the vaccine are presented. All monkeys were successfully vaccinated. (C) Western blot analysis for production of antibodies specific for recombinant human S100A9 protein (14 kDa) in No. 4 monkey. The serum samples from pre-vaccination (Pre) and post-vaccination (Post) were examined to determine whether they included antibodies that recognize recombinant S100A9 protein. The commercially available anti-S100A9 antibody (PC) or IgG purified from another normal monkey (NC) was used as a positive control or a negative control, respectively.
Figure 3Effect of S100A9 vaccination on thrombus formation. (A) Thrombus formation in the mixture of fresh plasma and pre-vaccinated (dotted line) and post-vaccinated (line) serum was evaluated under laminar flow with collagen (T-TAS). (B) The AUC in (A) was calculated. The post-vaccinated serum from monkeys No. 1 and No. 4 shows a delay in thrombus formation. Data represent the mean ± SEM of 3 times measurements in each group. *Mann–Whitney test, p < 0.05 vs. pre-vaccinated monkey. T-TAS, total thrombus formation analysis system.
Figure 4Reversal anti-thrombotic effects by epitope peptide. (A) Thrombus formation in the mixture of fresh plasma, post-vaccinated serum from No. 4 monkey, and epitope peptide (line), which could be recognized by the produced antibody. As a negative control, control peptide was added instead of epitope peptide (dotted line). Control peptide had no influences on the anti-thrombotic effects of the peptide vaccine, whereas epitope peptide reversed the anti-thrombotic effect. (B) The AUC in (A) was calculated. Data represent the mean ± SEM of 3 times measurements. Although there was no significant difference, there was a tendency of increased AUC in the serum mixed with an epitope peptide. Control control peptide, Epitope epitope peptide.