| Literature DB >> 34073927 |
Viktor Soltes1, Jozef Kubas2, Andrej Velas1, David Michalík3.
Abstract
The municipal police agencies increase the safety of a municipality's citizens and thus increase their quality of life. When performing interventions, municipal police officers may endanger their safety and health. This paper deals with the analysis of the riskiness of municipal police officers working in the Slovak Republic and the Czech Republic from 2004 to 2019 and the assessment of their occupational safety. The risk analysis was carried out on the basis of a risk matrix and calculations of the probability of attack and injury to municipal police officers. Using the Pearson correlation coefficient, the dependence between the selected variables was investigated. The reliability of this dependence was examined by the determination coefficient. The main result of the paper is the determination of the riskiness category of municipal police officer work based on the assessment of the occupational health protection of officers through statistical indicators of their activities and risk matrix. The results will serve as part of the explanatory memorandum for the proposal of legislative changes in order to increase the occupational health protection of municipal police officers.Entities:
Keywords: municipal police; occupational health; police; risk assessment; vulnerability
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34073927 PMCID: PMC8197331 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115605
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Occupational health risk matrix [39,40].
| Likelihood | Severity | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slight | Moderate | Extreme | |||||||||||
| Insignificant = 1 | Minor Incident = 2 | Minor Injury = 3 | Health Damage = 4 | Injury = 5 | Multiple Injuries = 6 | Serious Injury = 7 | Fatal = 8 | Multiple Fatalities = 9 | |||||
| Rare | Impossible = 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |||
| Remote = 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 16 | 18 | ||||
| Unlikely = 3 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 | 27 | ||||
| Occasional | Possible = 4 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 24 | 28 | 32 | 36 | |||
| Unusual = 5 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 40 | 45 | ||||
| Known = 6 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 24 | 30 | 36 | 42 | 48 | 54 | ||||
| Frequent | Likely = 7 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | 35 | 42 | 49 | 56 | 63 | |||
| Usual = 8 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 32 | 40 | 48 | 56 | 64 | 72 | ||||
| Certain = 9 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 36 | 45 | 54 | 63 | 72 | 81 | ||||
|
| Minimum | Low | Medium-low | Moderate | High | Extreme | |||||||
Colouring within the table represents level of risk.
Figure 1The territory of Slovakia covered by municipal police agencies (marked with red).
Figure 2Basic statistical data of municipal police agencies in Slovakia [41].
Attack and vulnerability probability of municipal police officers in Slovakia [41].
| Year | Number of Attacks on Municipal Police Officers | Number of Injured Municipal Police Officers | Probability of Attack on Municipal Police Officers | Probability of Municipal Police Officer Injury |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 149 | 24 | 6.80% | 16.11% |
| 2005 | 89 | 28 | 4.05% | 31.46% |
| 2006 | 83 | 26 | 3.67% | 31.33% |
| 2007 | 80 | 28 | 3.50% | 35.00% |
| 2008 | 75 | 16 | 3.17% | 21.33% |
| 2009 | 86 | 21 | 3.46% | 24.42% |
| 2010 | 73 | 11 | 2.93% | 15.07% |
| 2011 | 81 | 26 | 3.28% | 32.10% |
| 2012 | 63 | 20 | 2.49% | 31.75% |
| 2013 | 38 | 12 | 1.51% | 31.58% |
| 2014 | 42 | 16 | 1.66% | 38.10% |
| 2015 | 39 | 16 | 1.54% | 41.03% |
| 2016 | 43 | 18 | 1.70% | 41.86% |
| 2017 | 29 | 8 | 1.15% | 27.59% |
| 2018 | 48 | 19 | 1.89% | 39.58% |
| 2019 | 55 | 24 | 2.16% | 43.64% |
Figure 3Vulnerability of municipal police officers [41].
Figure 4Dependence of variables related to the vulnerability of municipal police officers. y—regression equation; R2—coefficient of determination.
Basic statistical data of municipal police agencies in Czechia [36].
| Year | Number of Municipal Police Employees | Number of Attacks on Municipal Police Officers | Probability of Attack on Municipal Police Officers | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Officer | Candidate | Other | |||
| 2010 | 9582 | 2.93% | 15.07% | ||
| 8613 | 114 | 855 | |||
| 2011 | 9542 | 3.28% | 32.10% | ||
| 8581 | 95 | 866 | |||
| 2012 | 9538 | 2.49% | 31.75% | ||
| 8580 | 59 | 899 | |||
| 2013 | 9516 | 1.51% | 31.58% | ||
| 8482 | 85 | 949 | |||
| 2014 | 9536 | 1.66% | 38.10% | ||
| 8444 | 58 | 1034 | |||
| 2015 | 9691 | 1.54% | 41.03% | ||
| 8515 | 109 | 1067 | |||
| 2016 | 9806 | 1.70% | 41.86% | ||
| 8459 | 90 | 1257 | |||
| 2017 | 9769 | 1.15% | 27.59% | ||
| 8431 | 64 | 1274 | |||
| 2018 | 9717 | 1.89% | 39.58% | ||
| 8386 | 55 | 1276 | |||
| 2019 | 9658 | 2.16% | 43.64% | ||
| 8288 | 63 | 1307 | |||
Attack and vulnerability probability of municipal police officers in Slovakia [21,45,46,47,48].
| Factor of Work | Category | Characteristics of Work |
|---|---|---|
| A. Noise | 1 | (a) Works in which the normalized noise exposure level LAEX,8h does not exceed 75 dB for 8 h, or the peak level C of acoustic pressure LCPk does not exceed 130 dB. |
| B. Vibrations | - | Not determined. |
| C. Electromagnetic field | - | Not determined. |
| D. Ultraviolet radiation | - | Not determined. |
| E. Infrared radiation | - | Not determined. |
| F. Lasers | - | Not determined. |
| G. Intense pulsed light | - | Not determined. |
| H. Ionizing radiation | - | Not determined. |
| I. Increased air pressure | - | Not determined. |
| J. Chemical factors | - | Not determined. |
| K. Carcinogenic and mutagenic factors | - | Not determined. |
| L. Biological factors | 2 | Works in which exposure is a group 2 biological factor (may cause human disease and could be hazardous to employees, but is unlikely to spread to the population, and usually effective prophylaxis or treatment is available) or a group 3 biological factor (may cause serious human disease and serious danger to employees; they may pose a risk of spreading in the population, with effective prophylaxis or treatment usually available) if the infections they cause do not normally spread through the air and for which effective prophylaxis and treatment is available. |
| M. Heat load | 2 | (a) Works performed in the long term at an indoor workplace, where the permissible value of the operating temperature is exceeded due to heat load from technology, but the degree of heat load does not require the limitation of working time by adhering to long-term tolerable working time and short-term tolerable working time. |
| N. Cold load | 2 | (a) Works performed in the long term at an indoor workplace, where, due to technological reasons, the permissible value of the operating temperature is not reached, but the operating temperature in these areas is not lower than +4 °C. |
| O. Physical load | 2 | (a) Works predominantly dynamic, performed by large muscle groups in which: |
| P. Mental workload | 2 | Work in which the mental workload assessed according to the characteristics of work and the work environment reaches an increased intensity according to the method specified in Annex no. 5 of the decree on details of health protection against physical stress at work, mental workload, and sensory stress at work. |
LAEX—Normalized noise exposure level; LCPk—Peak sound pressure level C.
Occupational health risk matrix for Slovak municipal police agencies.
| Hazard | Likelihood | Severity | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | Unlikely | Minor incident | Minimum |
| Biological factors | Likely | Serious injury | Extreme |
| Heat load | Known | Minor injury | Low |
| Cold load | Known | Health damage | Moderate |
| Physical load | Possible | Injury | Moderate |
| Mental workload | Likely | Minor injury | Medium-low |