Literature DB >> 34073477

Complete Metabolic Response in FDG-PET-CT Scan before Discontinuation of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Correlates with Long Progression-Free Survival.

Timo E Schank1, Andrea Forschner2, Michael Max Sachse3, Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss4, Christos Sachpekidis4, Albrecht Stenzinger5, Anna-Lena Volckmar5, Alexander Enk1, Jessica C Hassel1.   

Abstract

Checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of patients with metastasized melanoma. However, it remains unclear when to stop treatment. We retrospectively analyzed 45 patients (median age 64 years; 58% male) with metastasized melanoma from 3 cancer centers that received checkpoint inhibitors and discontinued therapy due to either immune-related adverse events or patient decision after an (18F)2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) combined with a low-dose CT scan (FDG-PET-CT) scan without signs for disease progression. After a median of 21 (range 1-42) months of immunotherapy an FDG-PET-CT scan was performed to evaluate disease activity. In these, 32 patients (71%) showed a complete metabolic response (CMR) and 13 were classified as non-CMR. After a median follow-up of 34 (range 1-70) months, 3/32 (9%) of CMR patients and 6/13 (46%) of non-CMR patients had progressed (p = 0.007). Progression-free survival (PFS), as estimated from the date of last drug administration, was significantly longer among CMR patients than non-CMR (log-rank: p = 0.001; hazard ratio: 0.127; 95% CI: 0.032-0.511). Two-year PFS was 94% among CMR patients and 62% among non-CMR patients. Univariable Cox regression showed that metabolic response was the only parameter which predicted PFS (p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that metabolic response predicted disease progression (p = 0.008). In conclusion, our findings suggest that patients with CMR in an FDG-PET-CT scan may have a favorable outcome even if checkpoint inhibition is discontinued.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG-PET-CT scan; checkpoint inhibitors; melanoma; outcome

Year:  2021        PMID: 34073477     DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  20 in total

1.  Genotyping of colorectal cancer for cancer precision medicine: Results from the IPH Center for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Moritz Jesinghaus; Nicole Pfarr; Volker Endris; Matthias Kloor; Anna-Lena Volckmar; Regine Brandt; Esther Herpel; Alexander Muckenhuber; Felix Lasitschka; Peter Schirmacher; Roland Penzel; Wilko Weichert; Albrecht Stenzinger
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Next generation sequencing of the cellular and liquid fraction of pancreatic cyst fluid supports discrimination of IPMN from pseudocysts and reveals cases with multiple mutated driver clones: First findings from the prospective ZYSTEUS biomarker study.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Volckmar; Volker Endris; Matthias M Gaida; Jonas Leichsenring; Fabian Stögbauer; Michael Allgäuer; Moritz von Winterfeld; Roland Penzel; Martina Kirchner; Regine Brandt; Olaf Neumann; Holger Sültmann; Peter Schirmacher; Jochen Rudi; Daniel Schmitz; Albrecht Stenzinger
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Five-Year Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma.

Authors:  James Larkin; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Rene Gonzalez; Jean-Jacques Grob; Piotr Rutkowski; Christopher D Lao; C Lance Cowey; Dirk Schadendorf; John Wagstaff; Reinhard Dummer; Pier F Ferrucci; Michael Smylie; David Hogg; Andrew Hill; Ivan Márquez-Rodas; John Haanen; Massimo Guidoboni; Michele Maio; Patrick Schöffski; Matteo S Carlino; Céleste Lebbé; Grant McArthur; Paolo A Ascierto; Gregory A Daniels; Georgina V Long; Lars Bastholt; Jasmine I Rizzo; Agnes Balogh; Andriy Moshyk; F Stephen Hodi; Jedd D Wolchok
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The cessation of anti-PD-1 antibodies of complete responders in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Rahul Ladwa; Victoria Atkinson
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  Absolute number of new lesions on 18F-FDG PET/CT is more predictive of clinical response than SUV changes in metastatic melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab.

Authors:  Hoda Anwar; Christos Sachpekidis; Julia Winkler; Annette Kopp-Schneider; Uwe Haberkorn; Jessica C Hassel; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Toxicities of the anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint antibodies.

Authors:  J Naidoo; D B Page; B T Li; L C Connell; K Schindler; M E Lacouture; M A Postow; J D Wolchok
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-006): post-hoc 5-year results from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study.

Authors:  Caroline Robert; Antoni Ribas; Jacob Schachter; Ana Arance; Jean-Jacques Grob; Laurent Mortier; Adil Daud; Matteo S Carlino; Catriona M McNeil; Michal Lotem; James M G Larkin; Paul Lorigan; Bart Neyns; Christian U Blank; Teresa M Petrella; Omid Hamid; Shu-Chih Su; Clemens Krepler; Nageatte Ibrahim; Georgina V Long
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 8.  Monitoring of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors using PET-CT.

Authors:  Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 6.968

9.  Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Two-Year Outcomes From Two Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057).

Authors:  Leora Horn; David R Spigel; Everett E Vokes; Esther Holgado; Neal Ready; Martin Steins; Elena Poddubskaya; Hossein Borghaei; Enriqueta Felip; Luis Paz-Ares; Adam Pluzanski; Karen L Reckamp; Marco A Burgio; Martin Kohlhäeufl; David Waterhouse; Fabrice Barlesi; Scott Antonia; Oscar Arrieta; Jérôme Fayette; Lucio Crinò; Naiyer Rizvi; Martin Reck; Matthew D Hellmann; William J Geese; Ang Li; Anne Blackwood-Chirchir; Diane Healey; Julie Brahmer; Wilfried E E Eberhardt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Interim [18F]FDG PET/CT can predict response to anti-PD-1 treatment in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; Annette Kopp-Schneider; Leyun Pan; Dimitrios Papamichail; Uwe Haberkorn; Jessica C Hassel; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  2 in total

1.  Metabolic imaging with FDG-PET and time to progression in patients discontinuing immune-checkpoint inhibition for metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Justin Ferdinandus; Anne Zaremba; Wolfgang Peter Fendler; Elisabeth Livingstone; Lisa Zimmer; Lale Umutlu; Robert Seifert; Francesco Barbato; Selma Ugurel; Eleftheria Chorti; Viktor Grünwald; Ken Herrmann; Dirk Schadendorf
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 2.  The Role and Potential of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Malignant Melanoma: Prognostication, Monitoring Response to Targeted and Immunotherapy, and Radiomics.

Authors:  Luca Filippi; Francesco Bianconi; Orazio Schillaci; Angela Spanu; Barbara Palumbo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.