| Literature DB >> 34072846 |
Christina Bakker1, Lydia Hite1, Cody Wright1, Alexander Smart2, Thu Dinh3, Amanda Blair1, Keith Underwood1, J Kyle Grubbs1.
Abstract
Brassica cover crops have been widely used for improving soil health and as a feed resource for grazing cows, but their use in backgrounding diets is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of feeding a brassica cover crop mixture during backgrounding on beef palatability. Thirty steers were assigned to one of two dietary treatments during backgrounding with (1) ad libitum access to freshly cut brassica cover crop forage (CC) containing radish, turnip, rapeseed, and rye grass, or (2) common Midwestern dry lot backgrounding diet (CON). The steers were transitioned to a common finishing diet after backgrounding. Striploins were collected after harvest, and were analyzed for evaluation of the Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), collagen content, autolysis of calpain-1, proteolysis of desmin, and troponin-T; in addition, the tenderness, juiciness, and flavor evaluated by a trained sensory panel. A treatment x day interaction was observed for WBSF (p = 0.02). Steaks from the CON diet were less tender than CC steaks on days 3 and 7, but did not differ on days 14 and 21. Feeding a brassica mixture cover crop during the backgrounding phase of production did not impact the collagen content, autolysis of calpain-1, or proteolysis of desmin and troponin-T. Thus, additional investigation into the mechanisms responsible for the differences observed in instrumental tenderness is warranted.Entities:
Keywords: beef; brassica; proteolysis; radish; tenderness; turnip
Year: 2021 PMID: 34072846 PMCID: PMC8226966 DOI: 10.3390/foods10061250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Overall experimental design.
Backgrounding and finishing diet composition for steers backgrounded on a cover crop mixture including brassicas (CC) or a common Midwestern backgrounding diet (CON) 1.
| Nutrient Composition 2 | CC | CON | CC | CON | Finishing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| day 0–14 | day 15–44 | day 106–231 | |||
| Crude Protein | 13.31 | 17.02 | 13.06 | 16.10 | 13.73 |
| NEm, Mcal/cwt 3 | 60.15 | 71.62 | 60.11 | 72.35 | 86.03 |
| NEg, Mcal/cwt 4 | 34.34 | 44.93 | 34.25 | 45.26 | 58.14 |
1 CC = received a cover crop mixture including brassicas, CON = received a common midwestern backgrounding diet. 2 Calculated on a dry matter basis. 3 Net energy, maintenance. 4 Net energy, gain.
Figure 2Least squares means for backgrounding treatment: influence on Warner–Bratzler shear force value of strip steaks aged 3, 7, 14, or 21 days postmortem. CC—received a cover crop mixture including brassicas; CON—received a common Midwestern backgrounding diet. a b c d Means lacking common superscripts differ p < 0.05.
Least square means for the main effect of the background treatment influence 1 on strip steak cook loss, trained sensory panel attributes, and collagen content.
| Variable | CC | CON | SEM 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cook loss, % | 17.56 | 18.78 | 0.528 | 0.114 |
| Tenderness 3 | 68.24 | 74.00 | 4.389 | 0.346 |
| Juiciness 3 | 97.28 | 92.22 | 4.552 | 0.428 |
| Flavor 3 | 80.85 | 86.16 | 3.054 | 0.204 |
| Insoluble collagen, mg/g | 1.95 | 2.02 | 0.041 | 0.111 |
| Heat soluble collagen, mg/g | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.015 | 0.909 |
| Total collagen, mg/g | 2.20 | 2.26 | 0.049 | 0.189 |
1 CC—received a cover crop mixture including brassicas; CON—received a common Midwestern backgrounding diet. 2 Standard error of means. 3 Evaluated on an anchored unmarked 185 mm line scale where 0 indicates extremely tender, extremely juicy, or extremely bland beef flavor, and 185 indicates extremely tough, extremely dry, or extremely intense beef flavor.
Least square means of the impact of aging day on cook loss, proteolysis of desmin and troponin-T, and autolysis of calpain-1 of strip steaks from steers fed CC and CON diets 1 during backgrounding.
| Variable | 3 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 21 | SEM 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cook loss, % | 17.86 b | 17.27 b | 18.21 ab | 19.36 a | 19.36 a | 0.579 | 0.042 |
| Intact desmin (55 kDa) 3 | 1.4994 a | 1.0025 b | 0.7607 c | 0.6053 d | 0.6053 d | 0.064 | <0.001 |
| Intact troponin-T (37 kDa) 3 | 1.3437 a | 0.9993 b | 0.6769 c | 0.5887 c | 0.5887 c | 0.045 | <0.001 |
| Degraded troponin-T (28 kDa) 3 | 0.6758 c | 1.0216 b | 1.0786 b | 1.2881 a | 1.2881 a | 0.074 | <0.001 |
| Inactive calpain-1 (80 kDa) 4, % | 13.46 | 7.45 | - | - | - | 0.899 | <0.001 |
| Active calpain-1 (78 kDa) 4, % | 34.21 | 30.03 | - | - | - | 0.735 | <0.001 |
| Previously active calpain-1 (76 kDa) 4, % | 52.22 | 62.47 | - | - | - | 1.373 | <0.001 |
1 CC—received a cover crop mixture including brassicas; CON—received a common Midwestern backgrounding diet. 2 Standard error of means. 3 Expressed as a ratio to an internal standard. 4 Expressed as a percentage of total calpain-1. a b c d Means lacking common superscripts differ p < 0.05.
Figure 3Western blot images of (a) intact desmin (55 kDa), (b) intact and degraded troponin-T (37 and 28 kDa, respectively), and (c) inactive (80 kDa), active, (78 kDa), and previously active (76 kDa) calpain-1.
Least square means for the main effect of background treatment influence 1 on strip steak proteolysis of desmin and troponin-T, and autolysis of calpain-1.
| Variable | CC | CON | SEM 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intact desmin (55 kDa) 3 | 0.9262 | 1.0076 | 0.047 | 0.215 |
| Intact troponin-T (37 kDa) 3 | 0.8926 | 0.9117 | 0.032 | 0.673 |
| Degraded troponin-T (28 kDa) 3 | 1.0589 | 0.9781 | 0.052 | 0.314 |
| Inactive calpain-1 (80 kDa) 4, % | 9.99 | 10.92 | 0.899 | 0.470 |
| Active calpain-1 (78 kDa) 4, % | 31.71 | 32.52 | 0.735 | 0.444 |
| Previously active calpain-1 (76 kDa) 4, % | 58.24 | 56.44 | 1.373 | 0.361 |
1 CC—received a cover crop mixture including brassicas; CON—received a common Midwestern backgrounding diet. 2 Standard error of means. 3 Expressed as a ratio to an internal standard. 4 Expressed as a percentage of total calpain-1.