Literature DB >> 34072409

Can a Difference in Gestational Age According to Biparietal Diameter and Abdominal Circumference Predict Intrapartum Placental Abruption?

Jee-Youn Hong1, Jin-Ha Kim1, Seo-Yeon Kim2, Ji-Hee Sung1, Suk-Joo Choi1, Soo-Young Oh1, Cheong-Rae Roh1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate whether a difference in gestational age according to biparietal diameter (BPD) and abdominal circumference (AC) could be a clinically useful predictor of placental abruption during the intrapartum period. This retrospective cohort study was based on singletons who were delivered after 32 + 0 weeks between July 2015 and July 2020. We only included cases with at least two antepartum sonographies available within 4 weeks of delivery (n = 2790). We divided the study population into two groups according to the presence or absence of placental abruption and compared the clinical variables. The incidence of placental abruption was 2.0% (56/2790) and was associated with an older maternal age, a higher rate of preeclampsia, and being small for the gestational age. A difference of >2 weeks in gestational age according to BPD and AC occurred at a higher rate in the placental abruption group compared to the no abruption group (>2 weeks, 21.4% (12/56) vs. 7.5% (205/2734), p < 0.001; >3 weeks, 12.5% (7/56) vs. 2.0% (56/2734), p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the differences of >2 weeks and >3 weeks were both independent risk factors for placental abruption (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval), 2.289 (1.140-4.600) and 3.918 (1.517-9.771), respectively) after adjusting for maternal age, preeclampsia, and small for gestational age births. We identified that a difference in gestational age of >2 weeks between BPD and AC could be an independent predictor of placental abruption.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal circumference; biparietal diameter; placental abruption; ultrasound examination

Year:  2021        PMID: 34072409     DOI: 10.3390/jcm10112413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  44 in total

Review 1.  Brain-Sparing in Intrauterine Growth Restriction: Considerations for the Neonatologist.

Authors:  Emily Cohen; Willem Baerts; Frank van Bel
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 2.  Placental abruption.

Authors:  Yinka Oyelese; Cande V Ananth
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Placental findings in late-onset SGA births without Doppler signs of placental insufficiency.

Authors:  M Parra-Saavedra; F Crovetto; S Triunfo; S Savchev; A Peguero; A Nadal; G Parra; E Gratacos; F Figueras
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Neonatal Outcomes Associated With Placental Abruption.

Authors:  Katheryne L Downes; Edmond D Shenassa; Katherine L Grantz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure.

Authors:  S J Gordijn; I M Beune; B Thilaganathan; A Papageorghiou; A A Baschat; P N Baker; R M Silver; K Wynia; W Ganzevoort
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  Preterm premature rupture of membranes and abruptio placentae: is there an association between these pregnancy complications?

Authors:  C A Major; M de Veciana; D F Lewis; M A Morgan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Pathophysiology of ischemic placental disease.

Authors:  James M Roberts
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.300

9.  The changing trends in live birth statistics in Korea, 1970 to 2010.

Authors:  Jae Woo Lim
Journal:  Korean J Pediatr       Date:  2011-11-30

Review 10.  Rheological and physiological consequences of conversion of the maternal spiral arteries for uteroplacental blood flow during human pregnancy.

Authors:  G J Burton; A W Woods; E Jauniaux; J C P Kingdom
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.