| Literature DB >> 34072406 |
Paulina Lipinska1, Ewa Sell-Kubiak1, Piotr Pawlak1, Zofia Eliza Madeja1, Ewelina Warzych1.
Abstract
Glucose or fatty acids (FAs) metabolisms may alter the ovarian follicle environment and thus determine oocyte and the nascent embryo quality. The aim of the experiment was to investigate the effect of selective inhibition of glucose (iodoacetate + DHEA) or FA (etomoxir) metabolism on in vitro maturation (IVM) of bovine COCs (cumulus-oocyte complexes) to investigate oocyte's development, quality, and energy metabolism. After in vitro fertilization, embryos were cultured to the blastocyst stage. Lipid droplets, metabolome, and lipidome were analyzed in oocytes and cumulus cells. mRNA expression of the selected genes was measured in the cumulus cells. ATP and glutathione relative levels were measured in oocytes. Changes in FA content in the maturation medium were evaluated by mass spectrometry. Our results indicate that only glucose metabolism is substantial to the oocyte during IVM since only glucose inhibition decreased embryo culture efficiency. The most noteworthy differences in the reaction to the applied inhibition systems were observed in cumulus cells. The upregulation of ketone body metabolism in the cumulus cells of the glucose inhibition group suggest possibly failed attempts of cells to switch into lipid consumption. On the contrary, etomoxir treatment of the oocytes did not affect embryo development, probably due to undisturbed metabolism in cumulus cells. Therefore, we suggest that the energy pathways analyzed in this experiment are not interchangeable alternatives in bovine COCs.Entities:
Keywords: cumulus cells; energy metabolism; fatty acids; glucose; oocyte
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34072406 PMCID: PMC8228821 DOI: 10.3390/genes12060838
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
The sequences of primers and probes, their efficiency, and the length of the products obtained from mRNA gene expression experiment. Selected genes were analyzed in cumulus cells. F – forward primer sequence, R – reverse primer sequence, P – probe sequence.
| Gene | Sequences of Primers (F, R) and TaqMan Probes (P) | Length (bp) | Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | GGGAACCGTGAAGGCCTA | 159 | 1.942 | |
| F | AAGAGATCAAGCCTGTGATGGC | 84 | 1.944 | |
| F | GAGTGGAAGAGAAGCATCGG | 67 | 1.822 | |
| F | GCCAAGGAGGCAGCCA | 92 | 1.934 | |
| F | CTGCCGAAGACAGGGATTG | 108 | 1.907 | |
| F | AAAAATTGAAGCATTGAAGAATCTGA | 118 | 1.919 | |
| F | CGGGACCTGCAGTCCAAC | 89 | 1.894 | |
| F | TGACTCTAGTGTGCCTGTATGG | 145 | 1.895 | |
| F | TGCAGAGCTTACAGGACGAA | 118 | 1.948 | |
| F | GCTACAACACTGGAGTCATCAACG | 168 | 1.882 | |
| F | CACCATCTGGTGGCTGTTC | 135 | 1.852 | |
| F | ATCACTGTGGACATGATGTATGG | 97 | 1.932 | |
| F | ACCCTCAAGATTGTCAGCAA | 113 | 1.975 | |
| F | TGAACTCCCCTGAGAAAGCCT | 149 | 1.918 |
Figure 1The effect of glucose (IO+DHEA) and fatty acid (ETOMOXIR) metabolism inhibition on the efficiency of in vitro embryo production (means ± SD). *—p ≤ 0.05, **—p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 2The effect of glucose (IO+DHEA) and fatty acid (ETOMOXIR) metabolism inhibition on glutathione content in mature oocytes (means ± SD).
Figure 3The effect of glucose (IO+DHEA) and fatty acid (ETOMOXIR) metabolism inhibition on ATP content in oocytes (means ± SD). **—p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 4Confocal 3D projections of fluorescently stained oocytes (A) and cumulus cells (B) with BODIPY 493/503 (green—lipid droplets) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; blue—nuclei).
Figure 5The effect of glucose (IO+DHEA) and fatty acid (ETOMOXIR) metabolism inhibition on the lipid droplets parameters in (A) oocytes and (B) cumulus cells (means ± SD). *—p ≤ 0.05, **—p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 6The effect of glucose (IO+DHEA) and fatty acid (ETOMOXIR) metabolism inhibition on the selected gene expression levels (mRNA) in the cumulus cells. The results are shown as a transcript abundance relative to the geometric mean of reference genes (means ± SEM). *—p ≤ 0.05, **—p ≤ 0.01: (A) genes involved in glucose metabolism; (B) genes involved in fatty acid metabolism; (C) genes involved in oxidative stress protection.
Figure 7Enrichment metabolites analysis in oocytes and cumulus cells matured with IO+DHEA or ETOMOXIR inhibitors (data compared to control). Pathways that differed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) were marked with blue squares: (A) control vs. IO+DHEA in oocytes; (B) control vs. IO+DHEA in cumulus cells; (C) control vs. ETOMOXIR in oocytes; (D) control vs. ETOMOXIR in cumulus cells.
Figure 8The effect of glucose (IO+DHEA) and fatty acid (ETOMOXIR) metabolism inhibition on the lipidome in oocytes and cumulus cells. The results are shown as a fold change relative to the control group (means of experimental groups divided by means of control group). **—p ≤ 0.01. Cer (ceramides); Chol-ester (cholesterylester); DAG (diacylglycerols); GluCer (glucosylceramide); Chol (cholfragment); LPC (lysoPhosphatidylcholine); LPE (lysoPhosphatidylethanolamine); PC-O (phosphatidylcholineether); PE-O (phosphatidylethanolamineether); PE (phosphatidylethanolamine); PI (phosphatidylinositol); PS (phosphatidylserine); SM (sphingomyelin); TAG (triacylglycerol).
Figure 9The distribution of lipid classes regarding experimental group (CON vs. IO+DHEA vs. ETO) or cell type (OOCYTES vs. CUMULUS CELLS). Cer (ceramides); Chol-ester (cholesterylester); DAG (diacylglycerols); GluCer (glucosylceramide); Chol (cholfragment); LPC (lysoPhosphatidylcholine); LPE (lysoPhosphatidylethanolamine); PC-O (phosphatidylcholineether); PE-O (phosphatidylethanolamineether); PE (phosphatidylethanolamine); PI (phosphatidylinositol); PS (phosphatidylserine); SM (sphingomyelin); TAG (triacylglycerol).
Fatty-acid-concentration changes detected in the maturation medium (mean values). The positive values of concentration indicate higher concentration after IVM when compared to the medium before IVM (COCs secreted selected FA). The negative values of concentration indicate lower concentration after IVM when compared to the medium before IVM (COCs collected selected FA). Values are significantly different when * p ≤ 0.05 or ** p ≤ 0.01.
| CONTROL (Post-IVM Medium vs. Pre-IVM Medium) | IO+DHEA | ETOMOXIR | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post-IVM Medium vs. Pre-IVM Medium | p (IO+DHEA vs. CONTROL) | IO+DHEA vs. CONTROL | Post-IVM Medium vs. Pre-IVM Medium | ETOMOXIR vs. CONTROL | |||
| Caprylic/ Octanoid acid (C8:0) | −3.45 × 10−5 | −3.34 × 10−5 | 0.4277 | −7.39 × 10−5 | 0.0353 * | Higher uptake | |
| Caprinic/ Decanoic acid (C10:0) | 3.68 × 10−5 | 4.70 × 10−5 | 0.4832 | −1.63 × 10−5 | 0.0002 ** | Higher uptake | |
| Lauric/ Dodecanoic acid (C12:0) | −2.84 × 10−5 | 3.87 × 10−5 | 0.0715 | 3.43 × 10−6 | 0.0984 | ||
| Myristic /Tetradecanoic acid (C14:0) | −2.05 × 10−4 | 3.33 × 10−4 | 0.0534 | 5.60 × 10−4 | 0.009 ** | Higher secretion | |
| Pentadecanoic acid (C15:1) | −1.38 × 10−4 | 2.35 × 10−5 | 0.0047 ** | Higher secretion | 1.75 × 10−5 | 0.0131 * | Higher secretion |
| Palmitic acid (C16:0) | 1.67 × 10−3 | 1.73 × 10−3 | 0.4267 | 6.06 × 10−4 | 0.0216 * | Lower secretion | |
| Stearic acid (C18:0) | 1.87 × 10−3 | 2.10 × 10−3 | 0.3335 | 8.40 × 10−4 | 0.1159 | ||
| Oleic acid (C18:1n9) | 3.04 × 10−5 | 3.48 × 10−5 | 0.3174 | −3.02 × 10−6 | 0.0708 | ||
| Linoleic acid (C18:2) | 5.82 × 10−6 | −8.75 × 10−6 | 0.4747 | −2.06 × 10−5 | 0.0341 * | Higher uptake | |
| Arachidic/ Eicosanoic acid (C20:0) | −8.66 × 10−6 | −6.20 × 10−6 | 0.3878 | −2.84 × 10−5 | 0.0292 * | Higher uptake | |
Summary of the most important and significant results of the experiments observed within the cumulus–oocyte complex. The table shows the comparison of experimental groups vs. control. ↓—significant downregulation of the parameter; ↑—significant upregulation of the parameter; =—no significant change of the parameter.
| Parameters | IO + DHEA | ETOMOXIR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oocytes | Cumulus Cells | Oocytes | Cumulus Cells | |
|
| ||||
| LD count | ↓ | ↓ | = | ↓ |
| LD average size (µM) | = | ↑ | = | = |
| total lipid content | ↓ | = | ↓ | = |
|
| ||||
| PFKP | ↓ | ↓ | ||
| PDHA1 | = | ↓ | ||
| SLC2A1 | = | ↓ | ||
| ACACA | ↓ | ↓ | ||
| CPT1B | ↓ | ↓ | ||
| FASN | = | ↓ | ||
| PLIN2 | ↓ | ↑ | ||
| CD36 | = | ↑ | ||
|
| ↑ | ↑ | ||
|
| = | = | ||
|
| ||||
| fatty acid biosynthesis | ↓ | = | ↓ | |
| ketone body metabolism | = | ↑ | = | |
| β-alanine metabolism | = | ↑ | = | |
|
| ||||
| concentration of GPL-diether | ↑ | ↑ | = | = |
| concentration of other lipid classes | = | = | = | = |
| % distribution of lipid classes | = | = | = | = |